Verification of drag-reduction capabilities of stiff compliant coatings in air flow at moderate speeds

Open access

ABSTRACT

Skin frictional drag reduction efficiency of “stiff” compliant coating was investigated in a wind tunnel experiment. Flat plate compliant coating inserts were installed in a wind tunnel and the measurements of skin frictional drag and velocity field were carried out. The compliant coatings with varying viscoelastic properties had been prepared using different composition. In order to optimize the coating thickness, the most important design parameter, the dynamic viscoelastic properties had been determined experimentally. The aging of the materials (variation of their properties) during half a year was documented as well. A design procedure proposed by Kulik et al. (2008) was applied to get an optimal value for the coating thickness. Along with the drag measurement using the strain balance, velocity and pressure were measured for different coatings. The compliant coatings with the thickness h = 7mm achieved 4~5% drag reduction within a velocity range 30~40 m/s. The drag reduction mechanism of the attenuation of turbulence velocity fluctuations due to the compliant coating was demonstrated. It is envisioned that larger drag reduction effect is obtainable at higher flow velocities for high speed trains and subsonic aircrafts.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amphilokhiev V.B. Artyushkov L.S. Barbanel B.A. Korotkin A.I. Mazaev K.M. Maltsev L.I. and Semenov B.N. 2000. Modern State of the Theory of Boundary Layer Control. Saint-Petersburg: SUE “SPMDB Malachite”

  • Bandyopadhyay P.R. Henoch C. Hrubes J.D. Semenov B. N. Amirov A.I. Malyuga A.G. Choi K-S. and Escudier M.P. 2005. Experiments on the effects of ageing on compliant coating drag reduction. Phys. Fluids 7(8) 085104.

  • Boiko A.V. Kulik V.M. Seoudi B. Chun H.H. and Lee I. 2010. Measurement method of complex viscoelastic material properties. Int. J. of Solids and Structures 45 (3-4) pp.374-382.

  • Bushnell D.M. Hefner J.N. and Ash R.L. 1977. Effect of compliant wall motion on turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids vol. 20 pp.S31−S48

  • Carpenter P.W. 1990. Status of transition delay using compliant walls. In: Viscous Drag Reduction in Boundary Layers eds. D.M. Bushnell and J. N. Heffner Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics 123 pp.79-113.

  • Carpenter P.W. and Garrad A.D. 1985. The hydrodynamic stability of flows over Kramer-type compliant surfaces. Part1. Tolmien-Schlichting instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 155 pp.465-510.

  • Choi K-S. Yang X. Clayton B.R. Glover E.J. Atlar M. Semenov B.N. and Kulik V.M. 1997. Turbulent drag reduction using compliant surfaces. Proc. Royal Soc. London A 453 pp.2229-2240.

  • Duncan J.H. Waxman A M. and Tulin M.P. 1985. The dynamics of waves at the interface between a viscoelastic coating and a fluid flow. J. Fluid Mech. 158 pp.177-197.

  • Gad-el-Hak M. 1996. Compliant coatings: a decade of progress Appl. Mech. Rev. 49(10) part 2 pp.S147-S157

  • Gad-el-Hak M. Blackwelder R.F. and Riley J.J. 1984. On the interaction of compliant coatings with boundary layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 140 pp.257-280.

  • Huang J-C. and Johnson M.W. 2007. The influence of compliant surfaces on bypass transition. Exp. Fluids 42 pp.711-718.

  • Johansson A.V. and Alfredsson P.H. 1982. On the structure of turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 122 pp.295-314.

  • Kendall A. and Koochesfahani M. 2008. A method for estimating wall friction in turbulent wall-bounded flows. Exp. Fluids 44 pp.773-780.

  • Kornilov V.I. Pavlyuchenko A. M. and Sobolev A.V. 2004. Effect of a viscoelastic coating on friction drag of a flat plate in air flow. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics 11(3) pp.405-415.

  • Kramer M.O. 1957. Boundary layer stabilization by distributed damping. J. Aero. Sci. 24(6) pp.459-460.

  • Kramer M.O. 1962. Boundary layer stabilization by distributed damping. Naval Engineers J. 74(2) pp.341-348.

  • Kulik V.M. Poguda I.S. and Semenov B.N. 1991. Experimental investigation of one-layer viscoelastic coating action on turbulent friction and wall pressure fluctuations. In: Recent Developments in Turbulence Management ed. K.-S. Choi Kluwer pp.263-289

  • Kulik V.M. Rodyakn S.V. Lee I. and Chun H.H. 2005a. Deformation of a viscoelastic coating under the action of convective pressure fluctuations. Exp. Fluids 38(5) pp.648-655.

  • Kulik V.M. Rodyakn S.V. Suh S-B. Lee I. and Chun H.H. 2005b. The response of compliant coating to nonstationary disturbances Phys. Fluids 17(8) 088104.

  • Kulik V.M. Lee I. and Chun H.H. 2008. Wave properties of coating for skin friction reduction. Phys. Fluids 20(7) 075109

  • Kulik V.M. Semenov B.N. Boiko A.V. Seoudi B. Chun H. H. and Lee I. 2009. Measurement of dynamic properties of viscoelastic materials. Exp. Mech. 49 pp.417-425.

  • Musker A.J. 1979. Explicit expression for the smooth wall velocity distribution in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J.17 pp.655-657.

  • Schlichting H. 1968. Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill New York.

  • Semenov B.N. 1991. On conditions of modeling and choice of viscoelastic coatings for drag reduction. In: Recent Developments in Turbulence Management edited by K.- S. Choi Kluwer pp.241-262.

  • Semenov B.N. 1996. Analysis of four types of viscoelastic coating for turbulent drag reduction. Emerging Techniques in Drag Reduction MEP London Edmunds Semenov B.N. 2009. Strategy of a choice of single-layer compliant coatings for turbulent drag reduction. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics 16(2) pp.219-228.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.930
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.997

CiteScore 2018: 2.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.826
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.741

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 145 37 0
PDF Downloads 48 13 0