Editorial

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The rise in zero hours contracts in liberal market economies (LMEs) has recently received much attention with calls for regulation to protect workers. LMEs typically adopt flexible labour market policies that are less regulated than coordinated market economies (CMEs) as a competitive advantage. In this paper we examine nuanced differences in the nature and regulation of zero hours work in the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. With an increased diffusion of zero hours work in both countries, we examine the different responses taken by these similar LMEs to this contemporary employment issue. We examine whether, as expected in an LME context, there is weak regulation in both countries and the factors influencing this. We find subtle but important differences between regulations of zero hours contracts. We conclude by discussing the possible implications of the UK’s exit from the European Union (EU) (Brexit) for the regulation of precarious work.</abstract>

The Same but Different: Regulating Zero Hours Work in Two Liberal Market Economies

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Drawing on the Quarterly National Household Survey (QNHS), this paper examines changes in the proportion of people aged over 50, active in the Irish labour market from 1998 to 2014. Results indicate that an increasing number of workers over 50 remain active, due mainly to the dramatic increase in the proportion of older females remaining in the labour force. By 2014 the 50 to 64 age group accounted for a quarter of all economically active people in the labour market between 15 and 64. Older workers are more likely to be employees and less likely to be employers or self-employed in 2014 compared to 1998. Older workers in lower-level occupations, particularly over the age of 60, are more likely to remain economically active. Level of education is strongly associated with the likelihood of older workers remaining economically active, particularly for the 50-59 age group and for females. .</abstract>

Remaining active in the labour market: Trends and characteristics of the over 50s

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This paper examines the conditions under which annual hours (AH) are likely to succeed or fail and the role of workplace partnership in delivering mutual gains. We explore two case studies, in one company with a positive experience and in a second where AH were regarded as a failed initiative. The case studies are constructed from interviews with trade union and management representatives in the companies involved; from secondary sources and from a worker survey. The findings echo previous research that AH can deliver mutual gains in both the presence and absence of workplace partnership (Author and Author, 2016) and that delivery of real mutual gains is the key driver of the long term viability of AH. However, the balance of mutual gains is subject to change and is strongly influenced by structural factors determining the suitability of AH to the particular enterprise.</abstract>

Mutual Gains Success and Failure: Two Case Studies of Annual Hours in Ireland

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This study explores the effects of New Public Management (NPM) on trust amongst nursing professionals, nurses and nurse ward managers within the British National Health Service (NHS). Thirty-nine nurses and nurse ward managers, recruited randomly, participated in semi-structured interviews. The original data, collected in 2000-2002, are re-analysed from a discourse analysis perspective. The findings support and extend contemporary research. They show that nurses have a strong professional identity and commitment and that increasing managerialism is eroding trust. Nurses both accommodate and resist managerialist discourses. They conceptualise trust in terms of their own ward environment, line-manager and colleagues. Trust is reciprocal and related to previous experiences and other factors. Trust is beneficial to healthcare organisations, healthcare professionals and their patients. Good communication and openness positively influence the development of trust. Nurse ward managers play a pivotal role in translating contested managerialist discourse into nursing practice to sustain trust and effect professional patient care.</abstract>

A discourse analysis of managerialism and trust amongst nursing professionals

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 42 (2023): Issue 2 (December 2023)

Volume 42 (2023): Issue 1 (July 2023)

Volume 41 (2022): Issue 2 (December 2022)

Volume 41 (2022): Issue 1 (July 2022)

Volume 40 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)

Volume 40 (2021): Issue 1 (July 2021)

Volume 39 (2020): Issue 2 (December 2020)

Volume 39 (2020): Issue 1 (August 2020)

Volume 38 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)

Volume 37 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)

Volume 36 (2017): Issue 3 (December 2017)

Volume 36 (2017): Issue 2 (September 2017)

Volume 36 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)

Volume 35 (2016): Issue 2 (September 2016)

Volume 35 (2016): Issue 1 (April 2016)

Volume 34 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)

The Irish Journal of Management

 The Irish Journal of Management (IJM) aims to publish well-written and well researched articles that will contribute to the understanding of management-related issues in both Irish and international contexts. The journal welcomes contributions from a wide range of management viewpoints, including inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary perspectives as well as traditional disciplines and functions. The journal seeks the following types of submissions:   Research Papers: Publishing quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods empirical research, literature reviews (traditional/narrative, systematic, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis), and conceptual papers. Page count should be less than 40 pages, double spaced, including references, tables, figures and appendices.  Teaching Submissions: These may include case study contributions, critiques and retrospective contributions on pedagogical issues related to teaching issues across management discipline areas. Teaching submissions should be between 30-40 pages, double spaced (including references and appendices) and provide a unique pedagogical or practical contribution, supported by state-of-the-art literature in the field.  Book Reviews: word count (1,000 – 2,000 words).  Special Issue Journal Submissions: The editors of the journal seek submissions for special issue themes that are in keeping with the overall focus of the journal and draw attention to important topics. Special issue proposals should be emailed to ijm@iamireland.ie before the 30th of September annually. Any submissions received after that deadline will be reviewed at the next date. Special issue proposals should include a detailed call for papers, listing potential themes for authors to consider, CVs of special issue editor(s) and a strategy to attract papers to your special issue.   The IJM is a peer-reviewed journal, with a "double-blind" review process involving at least two reviewers. The journal publishes two issues each year, in addition to occasional special issues  The journal offers Gold Open Access, free readership rights immediately upon publication, and follows CC BY NC ND (authors do not possess commercial rights). The author may post the final version of their paper to any repository or website. The article’s full text, metadata, supporting data and citations is machine readable, accessible via API and full text XML.  The journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges.  Journal Subjects include:   Accounting, Finance and Corporate Governance  CSR, Business Ethics and Sustainability  Education, Teaching and Learning  Entrepreneurship &amp; Small Business Management  Healthcare and Public Sector Management  Leadership &amp; Organisational Behaviour  Marketing and Services Management  Strategy and International Business  Technology and Innovation Management  Work, Employment and Organisation   Audience   Academics, researchers, practitioners, and policy makers   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 