The dividend payment is the very important part of investment decision for many stockholders. Results of this text identify finance factors that influence the management in dividend policy within the examined branch “Production and distribution of electric energy, gas and water”. Seven regressive models were created and they identify and define the effect of individual factors on the dividend payment among individual owner’s types. The retained earnings, the rate of return of invested assets in total and the size of company have the positive effect on the dividend payment. For the purpose of better interpretation the individual factors were quantified in form of the chance that the company will pay the dividend when compared to the fact that the company is not going to pay any dividend. The resulting regressive model was subsequently validated using the classification table and the receiver operating characteristic curve.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Benartzi S.; Michaely R. (1997). Thaler R. Do changes in dividends signal the future or the past?. The Journal of Finance 52(3)1007-1034.
Brockman P.; Unlu E. (2011). Earned/contributed capital dividend policy and disclosure quality: An international study. Journal of Banking & Finance 35(7)1610-1625.
DeAngelo H.; DeAngelo L.; Stulz Rene M. (2006). Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: a test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics 81(2) 227-254.
Easterbrook F. H. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. The American Economic Review 74(4) 650-659.
Elton E. J. Gruber M. J. (1970). Marginal stockholder tax rates and the clientele effect. The Review of Economics and Statistics 52(1) 68-74.
Fama E. F.; French K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics 60 (1) 3-43.
Healy P. M. Palepu K. G. (1988). Earnings Information Conveyed by Dividend Initiations and Omissions. Journal of Financial Economics 21(2)149-176.
Hosmer D. W. Lemeshow S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Chae J. S. Kim E. Lee. (2009). How corporate governance affects pazout policz under agencz problems and external financing constraints. Journal of Banking and Finance 33 2093-2101.
Jensen M. C. (1986). Agency costs of fre cash flow corporate finance and takeovers. The Amerrician Economie Review 76(2) 323-329.
Korkeamaki T.; Liljeblom E.; Pasternack D. (2010). Tax reform and payout policy: Do shareholder clienteles or payout policy adjust? Journal of Corporate Finance16(4) 572-587.
La Porta R. Lopez-De Silanes Florencio; Shleifer. (2000) Agency problem and Dividend Policies Around the World 2000. Journal of Finance 55(1) pp: 1-33.
Michaely R. & Roberts M. (2006). Dividend smoothing agency costs and information asymmetry: Lessons from the dividend policies of private firms. Unpublished working paper.
Miller M. H.; Modigliani F. (1961). Dividend policy growth and the valuation of shares. Journal of Business 34 411-433.
Nash R. C. Netter J. M. Poulsen A. B. (2003). Determinants of contractual relation betweem shareholders and bondholders: investment opportunities and restrictive covenants. Journal of Corporate Finance 9(2) 201-232.
Nissim D. Ziv A. (2001). Dividend changes and future profitability. Journal of Finance 61(6) 2111-2134.
Novotný J. (2014) Trendy investování podniků do komodit v současném podnikatelském prostředí na základě psychologické analýzy. Mezinárodní vědecká konference – Aktualne problémy podnikovej sféry 2014. Ekonomická Univerzita v Bratislavě 2014. ISBN 978-80-225-3867-1.
Travlos N. G. & Milonas N. T. (2001). The ex-dividend day stock price behaviour in the Athens Stock Exchange. In EFMA 2001 Lugano Meetings.