Language in Zhuangzi: How to Say Without Saying?

Open access

Abstract

The paper is concerned with the status of language and its usage in Zhuangzi and how this particular way of viewing and using language can affect our “perception” of Dao. Zhuangzi’s language skepticism is first introduced and possible reasons for Zhuangzi’s mistrust in language are explored. The question is then raised as to why Zhuangzi himself used language to talk about Dao if he mistrusted it. At this point Zhuangzi’s usage of language is discussed in two aspects: the negative aspect and the positive aspect, the latter being the main concern of this paper. The negative aspect is exposed as the denouncing factor of employing (fuzzy) language to undermine (propositional) language while using different techniques (paradox, uncertainty/doubt, mockery, reversal). The positive aspect is explored as twofold: first, putting language and reason to their “proper” limits entails an acquisition of a broader perspective and a more receptive, open state of mind which prepares one for the wordless “perception” of Dao. Second, fuzzy language is presented as capable of “accommodating” silence and emptiness. Doing so it unites silence and speech giving an incredible insight of what Dao is about. An approach taking from both the principles of scholarly analysis and an unrestricted personal experience of the text is employed.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allison R. E. 2007. Wittgenstein Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu: The Art of Circumlocution. Asian Philosophy Vol.17 No.1 pp. 97-108.

  • Berkson M. 1996. Language: The Guest of Reality - Zhuangzi and Derrida on Language Reality and Skillfulness. In: P. Kjellberg J. P. Ivanhoe ed. Essays on Skepticism Relativism and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. Albany: State University of New York Press pp. 97-126.

  • Mair V. H. 1998. Introduction. In: V. H. Mair. Wandering on the Way: Early Taoist Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press pp. xvii-liv.

  • Moeller H.-G. 2004. Daoism Explained: From the Dream of the Butterfly to the Fishnet Allegory. Chicago: Open Court.

  • Schwitzgebel E. 1996. Zhuangzi’s Attitude Toward Language and His Skepticism. In: P. Kjellberg J. P. Ivanhoe ed. Essays on Skepticism Relativism and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. Albany: State University of New York Press pp. 68-96.

  • Watson B. 1968. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York and London: Columbia University Press.

  • Wohlfahrt G. 2012. Beyond Words. Remarks on a Daoist Philosophy of Language. In: Philosophical Daoism. Zhuangzi Lectures pp. 47-50. Available at: http:// www.guenter-wohlfart.de/Docs/Guenter%20Wohlfart%20-%20Philosophical%20Daoism%20-%20Zhuangzi%20Lectures.pdf [Accessed 28 May 2013]

  • Wu Kuang-ming 2005. Chinese Philosophy and Story-Thinking. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy Vol. IV No. 2 pp. 217-234.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 602 331 14
PDF Downloads 212 120 12