The authors confront complexness and rigour of EU directives on public procurement vis-à-vis broad wording of international agreements concluded within EU neighbourhood policy. The firs reason for this comparison is ongoing spread of principles of the EU law to the third countries. The second reason is that both rely on the same goals: access to market ad fair environment via transparency because these principles constitute a subtle legal basis for public procurement legislation at all. Finally, these approaches were compared to the approaches employed in recent FTAs - CETA and EUSFTA. This paper is an output in a project granted by APVV-17-0641: Improvement of effectiveness of legal regulation of public procurement within EU law context
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Arrowsmith Sue. Understanding The Purpose Of The Eu’s Procurement Directives: The Limited Role Of Eu Regime And Some Proposals For Reform. In: Konkurrenswerket (Swedish Competition Authority): The Costs Of Different Goals Of Public Procurement Stockholm 2012.
Deutsch-Aserbaidschanische Auslandshandelskammer: Eu Busines Climate Report Azerbaijan 2017. Perception Of Eu Businesses Active In Azerbaijan. Available At: Https://Cdn2-Eeas.Fpfis.Tech.Ec.Europa.Eu/Cdn/Farfuture/Mk7ncccm8s3d4rhutjv084qy4wek6pdabsovrykuxry/Mtime:1497600803/Sites/Eeas/Files/Eu_Business_Climate_Report_Azerbaijan_2017.Pdf. Accessed 31.10.2018.
European Commission: Commission Staff Working Paper: Evaluation Report Impact And Effectiveness Of Eu Public Procurement Legislation. Part 1. Brussels 27.06.2011 Sec(2011) 853 Final.