Vanishing Set-Aside Authority in International Commercial Arbitration

Open access

Summary

Traditional set-aside theory is subject to considerable challenges as a result of an uncompromising trend towards autonomy and internationalism in international arbitration. The silence and ambiguity of international law regarding enforcement of set-aside arbitral awards allow some states to abandon their own set-aside authority or ignore set-aside decisions made by competent courts. This article presents a range of evidence that demonstrates the enforcement of set-aside arbitral awards has become a common phenomenon. This article first introduces robust academic debates regarding set-aside authority. Then this article exposes omission and ambiguity in the legal source, which leads to confusion in enforcement proceedings of set-aside arbitral awards. This article describes and analyses selected cases and practical data in order to summarize the approaches taken by national courts when reviewing foreign set-aside decisions. Finally, this article briefly evaluates the most promising solutions to the contradictory enforcement proceedings of set-aside arbitral awards.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abedian Hossein. Judicial Review of Arbitral Awards in International Arbitration –A Case for an Efficient System of Judicial Review. Journal of International Arbitration 2011 vol. 28 p. 553.

  • Berger Klaus Peter. Private Dispute Resolution in International Business: Negotiation Mediation Arbitration. Kluwer Law International 2015.

  • Bird Robert C. Enforcement of Annulled Arbitration Awards: A Company Perspective and an Evaluation of a “New” New York Convention. N.C. J. Int‘l L. & Com. Reg. 2012 vol. 37 p. 1028.

  • Chukwumerije Okezie. Choice of Law in International Commercial Arbitration. 1994.

  • Derains Yves Schwarts Eric A. A guide to the new ICC rules of Arbitration. Kluwer Law International 2005.

  • Dunmore Michael. Chapter III: The Award and the Courts Enforcement of Awards Set Aside in their Jurisdiction of Origin‘ in Klausegger Christian Klein Peter et al. (eds). Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2014. 2014.

  • GAILLARD Emmanuel Savage John (eds.). Fouchard Gaillard Goldman On International Commercial Arbitration 1999.

  • Gaillard E. The Enforcement of Awards Set Aside in the Country of Origin. ICSID Rev. 1999 vol. 14 p.16.

  • Graham Trotman/M. Nijhoff The Internationalisation of International Arbitration: The LCIA Centenary Conference. Graham & Trotman/M. Nijhoff 1995.

  • Hunter Martin Gui Gonde. Transnational Public Policy and its Application in Investment Arbitrations. J.W.I. 2003 vol. 4 p.367.

  • Jan Van Den Berg Albert. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration. 1976–2017.

  • Jan Van Den Berg Albert. Enforcement of arbitral awards annulled in Russia. Journal of International Arbitration 2010 vol. 27 p.179.

  • JAN VAN DEN BERG Albert. Hypothetical Draft Convention on the International Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and Awards’ [online hereinafter van den Berg Draft Convention] Available <http://www.arbitration-icca.org/media/0/12133674097980/hypothetical_draft_convention_ajbrev06.pdf > Accessed: 27. Nov. 2017.

  • JAN VAN DEN BERG Albert. A Closer Look at the Proposed “New New York Convention” [online hereinafter van den Berg Proposed ‘New New York Convention’] Global Arb. Rev. 2008 vol. 3 p. 19 Available <http://www.arbitration-icca.org/media/1/13318252772820/new_ny_conv.pdf> Accessed 27. Nov. 2017.

  • JAN VAN DEN BERG Albert. Should the Setting Aside of the Arbitral Award be Abolished? ICSID Review 2014 p. 12.

  • JAN VAN DEN BERG Albert. The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1981.

  • Koch Christopher. The Enforcement of Awards Annulled in their Place of Origin: The French and US experience. J. Int’l Arb. 2009 vol. 26 p.292.

  • Kerr Michael. The Arbitration Act 1979. Modern Law Review 1980 vol. 43 p.1.

  • Scodro Michael. Deterrence and Implied Limits on Arbitral Power. Duke L. J. 2005 vol. 55 p. 567.

  • Lastenouse Pierre. Why Setting Aside an Arbitral Award is not Enough to Remove it from the International Scene. Journal of International Arbitration 1999 vol. 16 p. 25.

  • Lalive Pierre. Transnational (or Truly International) Public Policy and International Arbitration. in Sanders Pieter (ed). Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration. 1987.

  • Lillich Richard B. Brower Cahrles N. International arbitration in the 21st century: Towards “Judicialization” and Uniformity. Transnational Publishers 1992.

  • Lew Julian D M. Does National Court Involvement Undermine the International Arbitration Process? Am. U. Int’l L. Rev. 2009 vol. 24 p. 489.

  • Mann F.A. Arbitrum Lex Facit. International Arbitration: Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke. 1967.

  • Paulsson J. Enforcing Arbitral Awards notwithstanding a Local Standard Annulment (LSA). ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin 1998 vol. 9 no. 1 p.14.

  • Park W. Duty and Discretion in International Arbitration. Am J. Int’l L. 1999 vol. 93 p. 805.

  • Paulsson Jan Bosman Lise. ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration. 1994–2015.

  • P. O’Mullan Michael. Note Seeking Consistency in Judicial Review of Securities Arbitration: An Analysis of the Manifest Disregard of the Law Standard. Fordham L. Rev. 1995 vol. 64 p. 1124.

  • Poudret Jean-François Besson Sébastien. Comparative Law of International Arbitration. Sweet & Maxwell 2007.

  • PARK William W. Judicial Controls in the Arbitral Process. Arb. Int‘l. 1989 vol.5 p.279.

  • PARK William W. The Lex Loci Arbitri and International Commercial Arbitration. I.C.L.Q. 1983 vol. 32 p. 2.

  • Reisman W. Michael. System of Control in International Adjudication and Arbitration Breakdown and Repair. Duke University Press Durham and London 1992.

  • Redfern Hunter. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford University Press 5th Ed. 2009.

  • Rubino-Sammartano Mauro. International Commercial Arbitration. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1990.

  • Read Pippa. Delocalization of International Commercial Arbitration: It’s Relevance in the New Millennium. Am. Rev. Int’l Arb. 1999 vol. 10 p. 186.

  • Radicati di Brozolo Luca G. The Present-Commercial Arbitration as a Transnational System of Justice in Jan Van Den Berg Albert (ed). Arbitration: the Next Fifty Years ICCA Congress Series. Kluwer Law International 2012 p. 96.

  • Scodro Michael A. Deterrence and Implied Limits on Arbitral Power. Duke L. J. 2005 vol. 55 p. 557.

  • Scherer Maxi. The Effect of Foreign National Court Judgments Relating to the Arbitral Award: An Emerging Conceptual Framework? in Menaker Andrea (ed). International Arbitration and the Rule of Law: Contribution and Conformity. Kluwer Law International 2017 pp. 691–705.

  • SHEN Wei. Rethinking the New York Convention: a law and economics approach. Cambridge: Intersentia 2013.

  • Thadikkaran Manu. Enforcement of Annulled Arbitral Awards: What Is and What Ought to Be? Journal of International Arbitration 2014 p. 575.

  • UNCITRAL. Case Law on UNCITRAL Texts (CLOUT). [online]. Available <http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/case_law.html> Accessed: 1. Nov. 2017.

Search
Journal information
Target audience: researchers and experts in the field of International law and EU Law
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 159 89 3
PDF Downloads 144 111 12