Impeachment in the U. S. Constitution and Practice – Implications for the Czech Constitution

Open access

Summary

The goal of this article is to critically evaluate, what role the impeachment plays in the U. S. Constitutional system and how it contributes to ensuring accountability of elected officials in the USA. To this end, the author will provide a short overview of the development of the institution of impeachment, discuss the current regulation of impeachment in the U. S. Constitution and the application of impeachment in practice, assessing its efficiency and role in the constitutional system. Finally, the conclusions will be reflected upon from the viewpoint of the Czech Constitutional system and its model of constitutional accountability.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ADAMS George Burton STEPHENS Henry Morse (eds). Select Documents of English Constitutional History. New York: MacMillan 1901.

  • ANSON William Reynell. The Law and Custom of the Constitution. Vol. II: The Crown Part I. Third Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1907.

  • BAUMGARTNER Jody C. KADA Naoko. (eds). Checking Executive Power. Presidential Impeachment in Comparative Perspective. Westport: Praeger 2003.

  • BERGER Raoul. Impeachment of Judges and “Good Behavior” Tenure. Yale Law Journal 1970 vol. 79 no. 8 pp. 1475–1531.

  • BERGER Raoul. Impeachment for „High Crimes and Misdemeanors“. Southern California Law Review 1971 vol. 44 pp. 395–460.

  • BERGER Raoul. Impeachment: The Constitutional Problems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1974.

  • BLACK Charles Lund. Impeachment: A Handbook. New Haven: Yale University Press 1974.

  • BOČEK Jan MAZÁK Jaromír ZLATKOVSKÝ Michal. Rozdělená společnost? Čechy proti sobě staví věk a vzdělání. www.rozhlas.cz 4. 1. 2017 Available at: https://interaktivni.rozhlas.cz/rozdelena-spolecnost/

  • CHEMERINSKY Erwin. Constitutional Law. Fourth Edition. New York: Wolters Kluwer 2013.

  • CLARKE Maude Violet. The Origin of Impeachment. Oxford Essays in Medieval History 1934.

  • DICEY Albert Venn. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Third Edition. London: MacMillan 1889.

  • DOUGHERTY John Hampden. Inherent Limitations Upon Impeachment. The Yale Law Journal 1913 vol. 23 no. 1 pp. 60–87.

  • FENTON Paul S. The Scope of the Impeachment Power. Northwestern University Law Review 1970 vol. 65 no. 5 pp. 719–758.

  • FIRMAGE Edwin Brown MANGRUM R. Collin. Removal of the President: Resignation and the Procedural Law of Impeachment. Duke Law Journal 1974 no. 6 pp. 1023–1116.

  • GERHARDT Michael J. Putting the Law of Impeachment in Perspective. Saint Louis University Law Journal 1999 vol. 43 pp. 905–930.

  • GERHARDT Michael J. The Historical and Constitutional Significance of the Impeachment and Trial of President Clinton. Hofstra Law Review 1999 vol. 28 pp. 349–392.

  • GERHARDT Michael J. The Lessons of Impeachment History. George Washington Law Review 1999 vol. 67 pp. 603–625.

  • GOLDSTEIN Joel K. Can the Vice President Preside at his Own Impeachment Trial? A Critique of Bare Textualism. Saint Louis University Law Journal 2000 vol. 44 pp. 849–870.

  • GORMLEY Ken. Impeachment and the Independent Counsel: A Dysfunctional Union. Stanford Law Review 1999 vol. 51 no. 2 pp. 309–355.

  • GUNTHER Gerald. Judicial Hegemony and Legislative Autonomy: The Nixon Case and the Impeachment Process. UCLA Law Review 1974 vol. 22 pp. 30–39.

  • HAMILTON Alexander MADISON James JAY John. The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam Dell 2003.

  • HOFFER Peter Charles HULL Natalie E. H. Power and Precedent in the Creation of an American Impeachment Tradition: The Eighteenth-Century Colonial Record. The William and Mary Quarterly 1979 vol. 36 no. 1 pp. 51–77.

  • JOHNSON Charles W. SULLIVAN John V. WICKHAM Jr. Thomas J. House Practice: A Guide to the Rules Precedents and Procedures of the House. Washington: Government Printing Office 2011.

  • KLARMAN Michael J. Constitutional Fetishism and the Clinton Impeachment Debate. Virginia Law Review 1999 vol. 85 no. 4 pp. 631–659.

  • LIFFLANDER Matthew L. The Impeachment of Governor Sulzer. A Story of American Politics. New York: SUNY Press 2012.

  • MARSHALL Peter James. The Impeachment of Warren Hastings. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1965.

  • MORGAN Charles EASTMAN Hope GALE Mary Ellen AREEN Judith. Impeachment: An Historical Overview. Seton Hall Law Review 1974 vol. 5 pp. 689–719.

  • NEUMANN Richard K. The Revival of Impeachment as a Partisan Political Weapon. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 2007 vol. 34 no. 2 pp. 161–327.

  • RAKOVE Jack Norman. Statement on the Background and History of Impeachment. George Washington Law Review 1998–1999 vol. 67 pp. 682–692.

  • REHNQUIST William Hubbs. The Impeachment Clause: A Wild Card in the Constitution. Northwestern University Law Review 1991 vol. 85 pp. 903–918.

  • ROBERTS Clayton. The Growth of responsible government in Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1966.

  • ROBERTS Clayton. The Law of Impeachment in Stuart England: A Reply to Raoul Berger. Yale Law Journal 1975 vol. 84 no. 7 pp. 1419–1439.

  • ROSKELL John Smith. The Impeachment of Michael de la Pole Earl of Suffolk in 1386 in the context of the reign of Richard II. Manchester: Manchester University Press 1984.

  • ROTUNDA Ronald D. An Essay on the Constitutional Parameters of Federal Impeachment. Kentucky Law Journal 1987 Vol. 76 pp. 707–732.

  • TAYLOR Hannis. The American Law of Impeachment. The North American Review 1905 vol. 180 no. 581 pp. 502–512.

  • TURLEY Jonathan. Congress As Grand Jury: The Role of the House of Representatives in the Impeachment of an American President. George Washington Law Review 1999 vol. 67 pp. 735–790.

  • TURLEY Jonathan. Senate Trials and Factional Disputes: Impeachment as a Madisonian Device. Duke Law Journal 1999 vol. 49 no. 1 pp. 1–146.

  • ZBÍRAL Robert. Volání po posílení empirie: Jak (ne)měnit českou Ústavu. Jurisprudence 2015 vol. 24 no. 4 pp. 10–15.

Search
Journal information
Target audience: researchers and experts in the field of International law and EU Law
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 217 79 4
PDF Downloads 129 58 2