Shakespeare and his contemporaries: Designing a genre classification scheme for Early English Books Online 1560–1640

Open access


The language of Early Modern texts can potentially reveal a lot about Shakespeare’s language. In this paper I describe the creation of a genre classification scheme for a segment of Early English Books Online – Text Creation Partnership (EEBO-TCP), covering the period 1560–1640. This categorisation permits meaningful comparison of the language of Shakespeare with that of his contemporaries and makes an integral contribution to The Encyclopaedia of Shakespeare’s Language project at Lancaster University. I outline the rationale behind the scheme, describe preliminary automatic genre classification work and present the prototype approach adopted for this categorisation. I also provide specific examples of classification in practice and discuss internal and external factors which influenced genre selection. I finish by suggesting how a range of scholars might benefit from this research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Austin John. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bate Jonathan. 1994. Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bergs Alexander. 2004. Letters: A new approach to text typology. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(2): 207–227.

  • Biber Douglas and Bethany Gray. 2013. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104–134.

  • Biber Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

  • Carroll Ruth Matti Peikola Hanna Salmi Mari-Liisa Varila Janne Skaffari and Risto Hiltunen. 2013. Pragmatics on the page. European Journal of English Studies 17(1): 54–71.

  • Claridge Claudia and Andrew Wilson. 2002. Style evolution in the English sermon. In T. Fanego B. Méndez-Naya and E. Seoane (eds.). Sounds words texts and change: Selected papers from 11 ICEHL 25–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Condren Conal. 2016. The language of politics in seventeenth-century England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • CoRD | Helsinki Corpus (HC). 1991.

  • Crystal David. 2018. Shakespeare’s words.

  • Crystal David. 2012. Think on my words: Exploring Shakespeare’s language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Culpeper Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Culpeper Jonathan. 2017. The influence of Italian manners on politeness in England 1550–1620. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18(2): 195–213.

  • De Grazia Margreta. 1980. The secularization of language in the seventeenth century. Journal of the History of Ideas 41(2): 319–329.

  • De Montaigne Michel. 1802. Essais. (Vol. 2: 10). Didot. (Original work published 1580).

  • Fanego Teresa Paula Rodríguez-Puente María José López-Couso Belén Méndez-Naya Paloma Núñez-Pertejo Cristina Blanco-García and Iván Tamaredo. 2017. The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41(1): 53–82.

  • Fowler Alastair. 1982. Kinds of literature: An introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Gotti Maurizio. 2001. The experimental essay in Early Modern English. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 221–239.

  • Greenblatt Stephen J. 1973. Sidney’s ‘Arcadia’ and the mixed mode. Studies in Philology 70(3): 269–278.

  • Hardie Andrew. 2012. CQPweb – combining power flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409.

  • Hope Jonathan. 2014. Shakespeare and language: Reason eloquence and artifice in the Renaissance. London: Bloomsbury.

  • Hünig Wolfgang K. 2003. Style labels in monolingual learner’s dictionaries. In G. Radden H. Cuyckens R. Dirven and K. Panther (eds.). Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden 367–390. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Johnson Keith. 2014. Shakespeare’s English: A practical linguistic guide. Harlow: Pearson.

  • Johnson Keith. 2019. Shakespeare’s language: Perspectives past and present. London: Routledge.

  • Jorgensen Paul A. 1954. Much ado about nothing. Shakespeare Quarterly 5(3): 287–295.

  • Kytö Merja. 1996 [1991]. 3rd edition. Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding conventions and lists of source texts. Helsinki: Department of English University of Helsinki.

  • Kytö Merja and Erik Smitterberg. 2015. English genres in diachronic corpus linguistics. In P. Shaw B. Erman G. Melchers and P. Sundkvist. (eds.). From clerks to corpora: Essays on the English language yesterday and today 117–133. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.

  • Lee David Y.W. 2001. Genres registers text types domain and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology: A Refereed Journal for Second and Foreign Language Educators 5(3): 37–72.

  • McClain Lisa. 2007. “They have taken away my Lord”: Mary Magdalene Christ’s missing body and the mass in Reformation England. The Sixteenth Century Journal 38(1): 77–96.

  • Meurman-Solin Anneli. 2001. Genre as a variable in sociohistorical linguistics. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 241–256.

  • Miller Henry K. 1956. The paradoxical encomium with special reference to its vogue in England 1600–1800. Modern Philology 53(3): 145–178.

  • Orr Leah. 2011. Genre labels on the title pages of English fiction 1660–1800. Philological Quarterly 90(1): 65–95.

  • Raber Karen. 2016. Fluid mechanics: Shakespeare’s subversive liquors. In D.B. Goldstein and A.L. Tigner (eds.). Culinary Shakespeare: Staging food and drink in early modern England 75–96. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

  • Ravassat Mireille and Jonathan Culpeper (eds.). 2011. Stylistics and Shakespeare: Transdisciplinary approaches. London: Continuum

  • Schmied Josef and Claudia Claridge. 1997. Classifying text- or genre-variation in the Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Texts’. In R. Hickey M. Kytö I. Lancashire and M. Rissanen (ed.). Tracing the trail of time: Proceedings from the Second Diachronic Corpora Workshop 119–136. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • Shapiro James. 2011. 1599: A year in the life of William Shakespeare. London: Faber & Faber.

  • Slaughter Mary M. 1982. Universal languages and scientific taxonomy in the seventeenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Smith Winnie. 2017. Documenting categories in EEBO-TCP data [Blog post: May].

  • Steen Gerard. 1999. Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes 28(2): 109–120.

  • Sullivan Ceri. 2007. Disposable elements? Indications of genre in early modern titles. The Modern Language Review 102(3): 641–653.

  • Swales John. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Taavitsainen Irma. 2001a. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres text types and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 139–150.

  • Taavitsainen Irma. 2001b. Middle English recipes: Genre characteristics text type features and underlying traditions of writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(1): 85–113.

  • Taavitsainen Irma. 2017. The essay in Early Modern and Late Modern English medical writing. Recherches anglaises et nord américaines (RANAM) 50: 15–30.

  • Taylor Gary John Jowett Terri Bourus and Gabriel Egan. 2017. The new Oxford Shakespeare: Critical reference edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Toolan Michael. 2008. Narrative progression in the short story: First steps in a corpus stylistic approach. Narrative 16(2): 105–120.

  • Woodbridge Linda. 2003. Jest books the literature of roguery and the vagrant poor in Renaissance England. English Literary Renaissance 33: 201–210.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 427 427 10
PDF Downloads 255 255 7