Shakespeare and his contemporaries: Designing a genre classification scheme for Early English Books Online 1560–1640

Sean Murphy 1
  • 1 Lancaster University,

Abstract

The language of Early Modern texts can potentially reveal a lot about Shakespeare’s language. In this paper I describe the creation of a genre classification scheme for a segment of Early English Books Online – Text Creation Partnership (EEBO-TCP), covering the period 1560–1640. This categorisation permits meaningful comparison of the language of Shakespeare with that of his contemporaries and makes an integral contribution to The Encyclopaedia of Shakespeare’s Language project at Lancaster University. I outline the rationale behind the scheme, describe preliminary automatic genre classification work and present the prototype approach adopted for this categorisation. I also provide specific examples of classification in practice and discuss internal and external factors which influenced genre selection. I finish by suggesting how a range of scholars might benefit from this research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Austin, John. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bate, Jonathan. 1994. Shakespeare and Ovid. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bergs, Alexander. 2004. Letters: A new approach to text typology. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(2): 207–227.

  • Biber, Douglas and Bethany Gray. 2013. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104–134.

  • Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.

  • Carroll, Ruth, Matti Peikola, Hanna Salmi, Mari-Liisa Varila, Janne Skaffari and Risto Hiltunen. 2013. Pragmatics on the page. European Journal of English Studies 17(1): 54–71.

  • Claridge, Claudia and Andrew Wilson. 2002. Style evolution in the English sermon. In T. Fanego, B. Méndez-Naya and E. Seoane (eds.). Sounds, words, texts and change: Selected papers from 11 ICEHL, 25–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Condren, Conal. 2016. The language of politics in seventeenth-century England. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • CoRD | Helsinki Corpus (HC). 1991. Helsinki.fi. http://www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpus/textcategories.html,

  • Crystal, David. 2018. Shakespeare’s words. https://www.shakespeareswords.com,

  • Crystal, David. 2012. Think on my words: Exploring Shakespeare’s language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Culpeper, Jonathan. 2017. The influence of Italian manners on politeness in England, 1550–1620. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18(2): 195–213.

  • De Grazia, Margreta. 1980. The secularization of language in the seventeenth century. Journal of the History of Ideas 41(2): 319–329.

  • De Montaigne, Michel. 1802. Essais. (Vol. 2: 10). Didot. (Original work published 1580).

  • Fanego Teresa, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo, Cristina Blanco-García and Iván Tamaredo. 2017. The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41(1): 53–82.

  • Fowler, Alastair. 1982. Kinds of literature: An introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Gotti, Maurizio. 2001. The experimental essay in Early Modern English. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 221–239.

  • Greenblatt, Stephen J. 1973. Sidney’s ‘Arcadia’ and the mixed mode. Studies in Philology 70(3): 269–278.

  • Hardie, Andrew. 2012. CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409.

  • Hope, Jonathan. 2014. Shakespeare and language: Reason, eloquence and artifice in the Renaissance. London: Bloomsbury.

  • Hünig, Wolfgang K. 2003. Style labels in monolingual learner’s dictionaries. In G. Radden, H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven and K. Panther (eds.). Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden, 367–390. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Johnson, Keith. 2014. Shakespeare’s English: A practical linguistic guide. Harlow: Pearson.

  • Johnson, Keith. 2019. Shakespeare’s language: Perspectives past and present. London: Routledge.

  • Jorgensen, Paul A. 1954. Much ado about nothing. Shakespeare Quarterly 5(3): 287–295.

  • Kytö, Merja. 1996 [1991]. 3rd edition. Manual to the diachronic part of the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Coding conventions and lists of source texts. Helsinki: Department of English, University of Helsinki.

  • Kytö, Merja and Erik Smitterberg. 2015. English genres in diachronic corpus linguistics. In P. Shaw, B. Erman, G. Melchers and P. Sundkvist. (eds.). From clerks to corpora: Essays on the English language yesterday and today, 117–133. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.

  • Lee, David Y.W. 2001. Genres, registers, text types, domain and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology: A Refereed Journal for Second and Foreign Language Educators 5(3): 37–72.

  • McClain, Lisa. 2007. “They have taken away my Lord”: Mary Magdalene, Christ’s missing body, and the mass in Reformation England. The Sixteenth Century Journal 38(1): 77–96.

  • Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2001. Genre as a variable in sociohistorical linguistics. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 241–256.

  • Miller, Henry K. 1956. The paradoxical encomium with special reference to its vogue in England, 1600–1800. Modern Philology 53(3): 145–178.

  • Orr, Leah. 2011. Genre labels on the title pages of English fiction, 1660–1800. Philological Quarterly 90(1): 65–95.

  • Raber, Karen. 2016. Fluid mechanics: Shakespeare’s subversive liquors. In D.B. Goldstein, and A.L. Tigner (eds.). Culinary Shakespeare: Staging food and drink in early modern England, 75–96. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.

  • Ravassat, Mireille and Jonathan Culpeper (eds.). 2011. Stylistics and Shakespeare: Transdisciplinary approaches. London: Continuum,

  • Schmied, Josef and Claudia Claridge. 1997. Classifying text- or genre-variation in the Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Texts’. In R. Hickey, M. Kytö, I. Lancashire and M. Rissanen (ed.). Tracing the trail of time: Proceedings from the Second Diachronic Corpora Workshop, 119–136. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

  • Shapiro, James. 2011. 1599: A year in the life of William Shakespeare. London: Faber & Faber.

  • Slaughter, Mary M. 1982. Universal languages and scientific taxonomy in the seventeenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Smith, Winnie. 2017. Documenting categories in EEBO-TCP data [Blog post: May]. https://www.linguisticdna.org.

  • Steen, Gerard. 1999. Genres of discourse and the definition of literature. Discourse Processes 28(2): 109–120.

  • Sullivan, Ceri. 2007. Disposable elements? Indications of genre in early modern titles. The Modern Language Review 102(3): 641–653.

  • Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001a. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 139–150.

  • Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001b. Middle English recipes: Genre characteristics, text type features and underlying traditions of writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(1): 85–113.

  • Taavitsainen, Irma. 2017. The essay in Early Modern and Late Modern English medical writing. Recherches anglaises et nord américaines (RANAM) 50: 15–30.

  • Taylor, Gary, John Jowett, Terri Bourus and Gabriel Egan. 2017. The new Oxford Shakespeare: Critical reference edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Toolan, Michael. 2008. Narrative progression in the short story: First steps in a corpus stylistic approach. Narrative 16(2): 105–120.

  • Woodbridge, Linda. 2003. Jest books, the literature of roguery, and the vagrant poor in Renaissance England. English Literary Renaissance 33: 201–210.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search