Kinetic and Kinematic Differences in a Golf Swing in One and Both Lower Limb Amputees

Open access


Amputee golfers need to cope with the absence of sole proprioception, a decreased range of swing motion and other factors which should be recognized for training purposes. The aim of this study was to determine the kinetic and kinematic differences in the golf swing in one leg and two legs amputees. The participants consisted of two males and one female at a professional or amateur level with a different degree of disability. Each participant was taped by 3D markers and performed five golf swings with the iron 6. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) did not vary between individuals in kinematics, however, it was low in kinetic variables of two leg amputees. The Kendal rank correlation showed a significant relationship between the level of amputation and a large number of kinetic and kinematic variables such as X factor, O factor, S factor and individual body angles. The fluency and similarity of the golf swing did not depend on the level of amputation. One lower limb amputation did not seem to increase movement variability contrary to two lower limb amputation. The most variable parameter was a weight-shift in all golfers. The takeaway and horizontal force angle depended on the level of amputation rather than individual technique, thus, their modification by training may be difficult. Estimation of golf swing „mistakes“ in amputees in respect to the leading arm in an early follow or late follow position appeared to be useless.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bechler JR Jobe FW Pink M Perry J Ruwe PA. Electromyographic analysis of the hip and knee during the golf swing. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 1995; 5(3): 162-166

  • Cheetham PJ Martin PE Mottram R St Laurent B. The importance of stretching the “X-Factor” in the downswing of golf: The “X-Factor Stretch”. Optimising performance in golf 192-199; 2001

  • Chu Y Sell TC Lephart SM. The relationship between biomechanical variables and driving performance during the golf swing. Journal of Sports Sciences 2010; 28(11): 1251-1259

  • Croix MDS Nute M. The effects of cognitive anxiety on the biomechanical characteristics of the golf swing. Biol. Sport 2008; 25(1): 3-11

  • Gerych D Tvrznik A Prokesova E Nemeckova Z Jelen K. Analysis of peak pressure maximal force and contact area changes during walking and running with conventional and shock-absorbing insoles in the combat boots of the Czech army. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology 2013; 13(02): 1350042

  • Jelen K Tetkova Z Halounova L Pavelka K Koudelka T Ruzicka P. Shape characteristics of the foot arch: dynamics in the pregnancy period. Neuroendocrinology Letters 2005; 26(6): 752-756

  • Kawashima K Meshizuka T Takeshita S. A Kinematic Analysis of Foot Force Exerted onthe Soles During the Golf Swing Among Skilled and Unskilled Golfers in: Farrally M.R. and Cochran A.J. eds. Science and Golf III: Proceedings of the World Scientific Congress of Golf Human Kinetics Champaign Illinois 40-45; 1998

  • Koenig G Tamres M Mann RW. The Biomechanics of the Shoe-Ground Interaction in Golf in: Cochran A.J. and Farrally M.R. eds. Science and Golf II: Proceedings of the WorldScientific Congress of Golf E & FN Spon London 40-45; 1994

  • Kovacikova Z Zemkova E Neumannova K Jelen M Jelen K Janura M. The role of lateral preference of lower limbs in a postural stabilization task. Neuro endocrinology letters 2015; 36(1): 91-95

  • Kwon Y-H Han KH Como C Lee S Singhal K. Validity of the X-factor computation methods and relationship between the X-factor parameters and clubhead velocity in skilled golfers. Sports Biomechanics 2013; 12(3): 231-246

  • McHardy A Pollard H. Muscle activity during the golf swing. British journal of sports medicine 2005; 39(11): 799-804

  • McHardy A Pollard H Bayley G. A comparison of the modern and classic golf swing: a clinician's perspective. South African Journal of Sports Medicine 2006; 18(3): 80-91

  • Meister DW Ladd AL Butler EE Zhao B Rogers AP Ray CJ Rose J. Rotational biomechanics of the elite golf swing: Benchmarks for amateurs. J Appl Biomech 2011; 27(3): 242-251

  • Myers J Lephart S Tsai Y-s Sell T Smoliga J Jolly J. The role of upper torso and pelvis rotation in driving performance during the golf swing. Journal of Sports Sciences 2008; 26(2): 181-188

  • Neal RJ Wilson BD. 3D kinematics and kinetics of the golf swing. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics 1985; 1(3): 221-232

  • Nesbit SM. A three dimensional kinematic and kinetic study of the golf swing. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine 2005; 4(4): 499

  • Okuda I Armstrong CW Tsunezumi H Yoshiike H. Biomechanical analysis of a professional golfer’s swing; A case study of Hidemichi Tanaka. In: Science and Golf IV: Proceedings of World Scientific Congress of Golf. Ed: Eric Thain. editor. London: Routledge 8-16; 2002

  • Sheskin DJ. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures crc Press; 2003

  • Sprigings E Mackenzie S. Examining the delayed release in the golf swing using computer simulation. Sports Engineering 2002; 5(1): 23-32

  • Watanabe K Kuroki S Hokari M Nishizawa S. Golf swing and skill. In Science and Golf III Proceedings From the 1998 World Scientific Congress of Golf St. Andrews Scotland: Human Kinetics 29-39; 1998

  • Williams KR Cavanagh PR. The mechanics of foot action during the golf swing and implications for shoe design. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 1983; 15: 247-55

  • Zheng N Barrentine S Fleisig G Andrews J. Kinematic analysis of swing in pro and amateur golfers. International Journal of Sports Medicine 2008; 29(6): 487-493

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.414
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.858

CiteScore 2018: 1.60

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.644
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.941

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 359 197 5
PDF Downloads 114 74 3