Prediction of Rowing Ergometer Performance from Functional Anaerobic Power, Strength and Anthropometric Components

Open access

Abstract

The aim of this research was to develop different regression models to predict 2000 m rowing ergometer performance with the use of anthropometric, anaerobic and strength variables and to determine how precisely the prediction models constituted by different variables predict performance, when conducted together in the same equation or individually. 38 male collegiate rowers (20.17 ± 1.22 years) participated in this study. Anthropometric, strength, 2000 m maximal rowing ergometer and rowing anaerobic power tests were applied. Multiple linear regression procedures were employed in SPSS 16 to constitute five different regression formulas using a different group of variables. The reliability of the regression models was expressed by R2 and the standard error of estimate (SEE). Relationships of all parameters with performance were investigated through Pearson correlation coefficients. The prediction model using a combination of anaerobic, strength and anthropometric variables was found to be the most reliable equation to predict 2000 m rowing ergometer performance (R2 = 0.92, SEE= 3.11 s). Besides, the equation that used rowing anaerobic and strength test results also provided a reliable prediction (R2 = 0.85, SEE= 4.27 s). As a conclusion, it seems clear that physiological determinants which are affected by anaerobic energy pathways should also get involved in the processes and models used for performance prediction and talent identification in rowing.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Boneva-Asiova Z Boyanov MA. Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals. Diabetes Obes MetabNov 2008; 10(11): 1012-1018

  • Bourgois J Claessens AL Vrijens J Philippaerts R Van Renterghem B Thomis M Janssens M Loos R Lefevre J. Anthropometric characteristics of elite male junior rowers. Br J Sports MedJun 2000; 34(3): 213-217

  • Carter JE Heath BH. Somatotyping - development and applications.New York: Cambridge University Press 352-375; 1990

  • Chun-Jung H Nesser TW Edwards JE. Strength and Power Determinants of Rowing Performance. JEP Online2007; 10(4): 43-50

  • Cosgrove MJ Wilson J Watt D Grant SF. The relationship between selected physiological variables of rowers and rowing performance as determined by a 2000 m ergometer test. J Sports Sci1999; 17(11): 845-852

  • Coyle EF Coggan AR Hooper MK Walters TJ. Determinants of endurance in well-trained cyclists. J Appl Physiol1988; 64(6): 2622-2630

  • Craig NP Norton KI Bourdon PC Woolford SM Stanef T Squires B Olds TS Conyers RAJ Walsh CBV. Aerobic and anaerobic indices contributing to track endurance cycling performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 1993; 67(2): 150-158

  • Droghetti P Jensen K Nilsen TS. The total estimated metabolic cost of rowing. FISA Coach1991; 2(2): 1-4

  • Hahn A. Identification and selection of talent in Australian rowing. Excel1990; 6(3): 5-11

  • Izquierdo-Gabarren M Exposito RG de Villarreal ES Izquierdo M. Physiological factors to predict on traditional rowing performance. Eur J Appl PhysiolJan 2010; 108(1): 83-92

  • Jurimae J Maestu J Jurimae T Pihl E. Prediction of rowing performance on single sculls from metabolic and anthropometric variables J Hum Movement Stud2000; 38(3): 123-136

  • Kramer JF Leger A Paterson DH Morrow A. Rowing performance and selected descriptive field and laboratory variables. Can J Appl Physiol1994; 19(2): 174-184

  • Malina RM. Physical activity and training: effects on stature and the adolescent growth spurt. Med Sci Sports Exerc1994; 26(6): 759-766

  • Mandic S Quinney HA Bell GJ. Modification of the Wingate anaerobic power test for rowing: optimization of the resistance setting. Int J Sports Med2004; 25(6): 409-414

  • McNeely E Sandler D Bamel S. Strength and Power Goals for Competitive Rowers. Strength Cond J2005; 27(3): 10-15

  • Morgan DW Baldini FD Martin PE Kohrt WM. Ten kilometer performance and predicted velocity at VO2max among well-trained male runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc1989; 21(1): 78-83

  • Nevill AM Beech C Holder RL Wyon M. Scaling concept II rowing ergometer performance for differences in body mass to better reflect rowing in water. Scand J Med Sci SportsFeb 2010; 20(1): 122-127

  • Norton K Olds T. Anthropometrica: a textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses.Sydney: University of NSW Press 25-73; 2004

  • Riechman SE Zoeller RF Balasekaran G Goss FL Robertson RJ. Prediction of 2000 m indoor rowing

  • performance using a 30 s sprint and maximal oxygen uptake. J Sports SciSep 2002; 20(9): 681-687

  • Rodriguez FA. Physical structure of international lightweight rowers In: Reilly T Watkins J Borms J eds. Kinanthropometry III.London: E & FN Spon; 1986:255-261.

  • Rodriguez RJ Rogriguez RP Cook SD Sandborn PM. Electromyographic analysis of rowing stroke biomechanics. J Sports Med Phys Fitness1990; 30(1): 103-108

  • Russell AP Le Rossignol PF Sparrow WA. Prediction of elite schoolboy 2000m rowing ergometer performance from metabolic anthropometric and strength variables. J Sports SciNov 1998; 16(8): 749754

  • Secher NH. Isometric rowing strength and inexperienced oarsmen. Med Sci Sports1975; 7(4): 280-283

  • Secher NH. Physiological and biomechanical aspects of rowing. Implications for training. Sports Med1993; 15(1): 24-42

  • Secher NH Vaage O Jensen K Jackson RC. Maximal aerobic power in oarsmen. Eur J Appl Physiol1983; 51(2): 155-162

  • Shephard RJ. Science and medicine of rowing: A review. J Sports Sci1998; 16(7): 603-620

  • Smith TB Hopkins WG. Measures of rowing performance. Sports MedApr 1 2012; 42(4): 343-358

  • Sparrow WA Newell KM. Energy expenditure and motor performance relationships in humans learning a motor task. Psychophysiology1994; 31(4): 338-346

  • Vogler AJ Rice AJ Gore CJ. Physiological responses to ergometer and on-water incremental rowing tests. Int J Sports Physiol PerformSep 2010; 5(3): 342-358

  • Yuhasz MS. Physical Fitness Appraisal Laboratory Manual.Ontario: University of Western Ontario 113-118; 1990

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.414
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.858

CiteScore 2018: 1.60

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.644
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.941

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 501 359 20
PDF Downloads 251 166 9