Wave Characteristics in Breaststroke Technique with and Without Snorkel Use

Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to examine the characteristics of waves generated when swimming with and without the use of Aquatrainer® snorkels. Eight male swimmers performed two maximal bouts of 25 m breaststroke, first without the use of a snorkel (normal condition) and then using a snorkel (snorkel condition). The body landmarks, centre of the mass velocity, stroke rate, stroke length, stroke index, and Strouhal number (St) were quantified. Fourier analysis was conducted to determine the frequency, amplitude, and phase characteristics of the vertical undulations. We also determined the undulation period, the first and second harmonic wave percentage, and the contribution of these components to the power of each of the wave signals. The first wave harmonics had a frequency of 0.76 Hz (normal condition) and 0.78 Hz (snorkel condition), and the second wave harmonics had a frequency of 1.52 Hz (normal condition) and 1.56 Hz (snorkel condition). Under the normal conditions, the wave amplitude was higher on the vertex (0.72 m) and cervical (0.32 m) than that produced under snorkel conditions (0.71 m and 0.28 m, respectively). The lowest values were found in the hip (0.03 m in normal conditions, and 0.02 m in snorkel conditions) and in the trunk (0.06 m in normal conditions, and 0.04 m in snorkel conditions). It can be concluded that snorkel use seems to lead to slight changes in the biomechanical pattern in swimming velocity, as well as several stroke mechanical variables.

Abdel-Aziz YI, Karara HM. Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. In: Symposium on Close-Range Photogrammetry, Falls Church: American Society of Photogrammetry, 1-18; 1971

Alexander RM, Jayes AS. Fourier analysis of forces exerted in walking and running. J Biomech, 1980; 13: 383-90

Barbosa TM, Keskinen KL, Fernandes RJ, Colaço P, Lima AB, Vilas-Boas JP. Energy cost and intracyclic variation of the velocity of the centre of mass in butterfly stroke. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2005; 93: 519-523

Costill D, Kovaleski J, Porter D, Fielding R, King D. Energy expenditure during front crawl swimming: predicting success in middle-distance events. Int J Sports Med, 1985; 6: 266-270.

De Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. J Biomech, 1996; 29: 1223-1230

Elliot DF, Rao KR. Fast Transforms: Algorithms, Analyses and Applications. Academic Press; 1982

Fish FE, Rohr JJ. Review of dolphin hydrodynamics and swimming performance. Technical Report 1801. San Diego, CA: US Navy; 1999

Hirata RP, Duarte M. Effect of relative knee position on internal mechanical loading during squatting. Braz JPhysical Therapy, 2007; 11: 107-111

Hochtsein S, Blickhan R. Human Undulatory Swimming: Kinematics, Flow and Mechanical Model. In: Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming XI. Eds: Kjendlie P-L, Stallman TK and Cabri J, Oslo: NorwegianSchool of Sport Sciences, 74; 2010

Kelso JA, Holt KG, Flatt AE. The role of proprioception in the perception and control of human movement: toward a theoretical reassessment. Percept Psychophys, 1980; 28: 45-52

Kelso JA, Holt KG, Rubin P, Kugler PN. Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data. J Mot Behav, 1981; 13: 226-61

Kjendlie PL, Stallman R, Stray-Gundersen J. Influences of breathing valve on swimming technique. In: Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. Eds: Chatard JC, France: University of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, 69-73; 2003

Rodríguez FA, Keskinen KL, Kusch M, HoVmann U. Validity of a swimming snorkel for metabolic testing. Int J Sports Med, 2008; 29:120-128

Sanders R, Cappaert JM, Devlin RK. Wave characteristics of butterfly swimming. J Biomech, 1995; 28: 9-16

Sanders R, Cappaert JM, Pease DL. Wave characteristics of Olympic breaststroke Swimmers. J Appl Biomech, 1998; 14: 40-51

Thornton KM. Learning from the Olympians: Butterfly stroke rhythm. Swimming World, 28-30; 1984

Toussaint H, Meulemans A, De Groot G, Hollander AP, Schreurs A, Vervoon K. Respiratory valve for oxygen uptake measurement during swimming. Eur J Appl Physiol, 1987; 56: 363-366

Triantafyllou GS, Triantafyllou MS. An efficient swimming machine. Scientific American, 1995; 64-70

Ungerechts BE. A comparison of the movements of the rear parts of dolphins and butterfly swimmers. In: Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming, Eds: Hollander AP, Champaign. Human Kinetics, 1982; 215-221

Ungerechts BE, Daly D, Zhu JP. What dolphins tell us about hydrodynamics. J Swim Res, 1998; 13: 1-7

Videler J, Kamermans P. Differences between upstroke and downstroke in swimming dolphins. J Exp Biol, 1985; 119: 265-274

Vilas-Boas JP, Cunha P, Figueiras T, Ferreira M, Duarte J. Movement analysis in simultaneously swimming technique. In: ölner Schwimmsporttage. Symposiumsbericht Sport Fahneman Verlag. Bockenem, Eds: Daniel K, Hoffman U, Klauck J, Germany, 95-103; 1997

Wilson DJ, Smith BK, Gibson JK. Accuracy of reconstructed angular estimates obtained with the Ariel Performance Analysis System. American Physical Therapy Association, 1997; 77: 1741-6

Journal of Human Kinetics

The Journal of Academy of Physical Education in Katowice

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.174
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.634

CiteScore 2017: 1.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.516
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.906

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 51 51 16
PDF Downloads 11 11 5