The Effects of Rhythm Training on Tennis Performance

Open access

The Effects of Rhythm Training on Tennis Performance

Rhythm training is an integral part of sports. The purposes of the study were to analyze the effects of rhythm training on tennis performance and rhytmic competence of tennis players, to compare the improvement levels of tennis specific and general rhythm training and to examine the effects of shorter and longer tempos on rhythmic competence. Thirty university students whose mean score of International Tennis Number (ITN) was 7.3 (±0.9) were divided randomly into three sub-groups: Tennis Group, General Rhythm Training Group and Tennis-Specific Rhythm Training Group. The experimental procedure lasted 8 weeks. During this period, all groups had the same tennis training twice a week. The Tennis Group had regular tennis training sessions. In addition to regular tennis training sessions, the General Rhythm Training Group followed the general rhythm training sessions and the Tennis-Specific Rhythm Training Group had tennis-specific rhythm training. The measurement instruments were ITN, Rhythmic Competence Analysis Test and Untimed Consecutive Rally Test. The results indicated that participation in tennis-specific or general rhythm training resulted in progress in tennis playing levels, forehand consistency performance and rhythmic competence of the participants. On the other hand, attendance to the regular 8-week tennis training was enough to solely increase the tennis playing level but not sufficient to develop forehand consistency performance and rhythmic competence. Although the participants in the TRTG had better improvement scores than the ones in the GRTG, no significant difference was found between the rhythm training groups. The results also revealed that participants exhibited higher rhythmic competence scores on fast tempo compared to slow tempo.

References
  • Baruch C, Panissal-Vieu N, Drake C. Preferred perceptual tempo for sound sequences: Comparison of adults, children, and infants. Percept Motor Skill, 2004; 98: 325-339.

  • Borysiuk Z, Waskiewicz Z. Information processes, stimulation and perceptual training in fencing. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2008; 19: 63-82.

  • Bourquin O. Coordination. In M Crespo, M Reid, D Miley (Eds.). Applied sport science for high performance tennis. The International Tennis Federation, ITF Ltd, 49-51; 2003.

  • Crespo M, Reid M, Miley D. Applied sport science for high performance tennis. The International Tennis Federation, ITF Ltd, 2003.

  • Ellis MC. Tempo perception and performance of elementary students, grades 3-6. J Res Music Educ, 1992; 40: 329-341.

  • Fraisse P. Rhythm and tempo. In D. Deutsch (Ed.). The psychology of music. Academic Press: New York, 149-180; 1982.

  • Gallahue DL. Developmental movement experiences for children. Macmillan Publishing Company: New York, 1982.

  • Kirchner G, Fishburne GJ. (1995). Physical education for elementary school children (9nd Ed.). WCB Brown and Benchmark Publishers, Dubuque, IA.

  • Kumai M. Relation between self-paced and synchronized movement in persons with mental retardation. Percept Motor Skill, 1999; 89: 395-402.

  • Kumai M, Sugai K. Relation between synchronized and self-paced response in preschoolers' rhythmic movement. Percept Motor Skill, 1997; 85: 1327-1337.

  • Laurence PC. The role of rhythm in ballet training. Research in Dance Education, 2000; 1: 173-191.

  • Mastrokalou N, Hatziharitos D. Rhythmic ability in children and the effects of age, sex, and tempo. Percept Motor Skill, 2007; 104: 901-912.

  • Pica R. Dance training for gymnastics. Leisure Press Champaign: IL, 1998.

  • Reid M, Chow JW, Crespo M. Muscle activity: An indicator for training. In B Elliot, M Reid, M Crespo (Eds.). ITF biomechanics of advanced tennis. The International Tennis Federation, ITF Ltd, 111-136; 2003.

  • Schönborn R. Timing in tennis: New findings and conclusions. In M Crespo, M Reid, D Miley (Eds.). Applied sport science for high performance tennis. The International Tennis Federation, ITF Ltd, 37-39; 2003.

  • Segal DK. Tennis biodynamic system: For the teaching and correction of tennis shots. Destino Global Sports Marketing: Buenos Aires, 2005.

  • Shaffer LH. Rhythm and timing in skill. Psychol Rev, 1982; 89: 109-122.

  • Sherman PA. A selected battery of tennis skill tests. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation: University of Iowa, 1972.

  • Smith LM. A multiresolution time-frequency analysis and interpretation of musical rhythm. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation: University of Western Australia, 1999.

  • Thaut MH. Rhythm, music, and the brain: Scientific foundation and clinical application. Routledge. New York, 2005.

  • Trump PB. Effects of Weikart's sequential approach to rhythmic movement on development of rhythmic competency in primary age children. Unpublished Master Thesis: Drake University, 1987.

  • Van Der Mars H. Observer reliability: Issues and procedures. In PW Darst, DB Zakrajsek, VH Mancini (Eds.). Analyzing physical education and sports instruction. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 55-80; 1989.

  • Weikart P. Teaching movement and dance: A sequential approach to rhythmic movement. The High/Scope Press, Ypsilanti: MI, 1989.

  • Wight MG. The effect of training on rhythmic ability and other problems related to rhythm. Child Dev, 1937; 8: 159-172.

  • Zachopoulou E, Derri V, Chatzopoulos D, Ellinoudis T. Application of Orff and Dalcroze activities in preschool children: Do they affect the level of rhythmic ability? Physical Educator, 2003; 60: 50-56.

  • Zachopoulou E, Mantis K. The role of rhythmic ability on the forehand performance in tennis. European Journal of Physical Education, 2001; 6: 117-126.

  • Zachopoulou E, Mantis K, Serbezis V, Teodosiou A, Papadimitriou K. Differentiation of parameters for rhythmic ability among young tennis players, basketball players and swimmers. European Journal of Physical Education, 2000; 5: 220-230.

Journal of Human Kinetics

The Journal of Academy of Physical Education in Katowice

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.798
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.252

CiteScore 2016: 1.16

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.483
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.792

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 23 23 21
PDF Downloads 9 9 8