Influence of the Number of Sets at a Strength Training in the Flexibility Gains

Open access

Influence of the Number of Sets at a Strength Training in the Flexibility Gains

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 10 weeks of strength training with different number of sets and their influence on flexibility of young men. Sixty men were divided into three groups as follows: group that trained 1 set per exercise (G1S), group that trained 3 sets per exercise (G3S) and control group (CG). The training lasted 10 weeks, totaling 30 training sessions. The training groups performed 8 to 12 repetitions per set for each exercise. The flexibility at Sit and Reach Test was evaluated pre and post-training. Both trained groups showed significant increase in flexibility when compared to pre-training and the G3S showed significant difference when compared to CG post-training. According to this study, the strength training carried out without flexibility training promotes flexibility gains regardless the number of sets.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM'S Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription 6th Ed. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins 2006; 56-60.

  • American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM Position Stand: the recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 975-91.

  • Barbosa AR Santarém JM Filho WJ Marucci M.F. Effects of resistance training on the sit-and-reach test in elderly women. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16:14-8.

  • Bottaro M Veloso J de Salles BF Simão R Celes R Brown LE. Early phase adaptations of single vs. multiple sets of strength training on upper and lower strength gains. Isokinetics Exerc Scie 2009; 17: 207-12.

  • Fatouros IG Kambas A Katrabasas I Leontsini D Chatzinikolaou A Jamurtas AZ Douroudos I Aggelousis N Taxildaris K. Resistance training and detraining effects on flexibility performance in the elderly are intensity-dependent. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20:634-42.

  • Fatouros IG Kambas A Katrabasas I Nikolaidis K Chatzinikolaou A Leontsini D Taxildaris K. Strength training and detraining effects on muscular strength anaerobic power and mobility of inactive older are intensity dependent. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39:776-80.

  • Fatouros IG Taxildaris K Tokmakidis SP Kalapotharakos V Aggelousis N Athanasopoulos S Zeeris I Katrabasas I. The effects of strength training cardiovascular training and their combination on flexibility of inactive older adults. Int J Sports Med 2002; 23:112-9.

  • Monteiro WD Simão R Polito MD Santana CA Chaves RB Bezerra E Fleck SJ. Influence of strength training on adults women's flexibility. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22:672-7.

  • Nóbrega ACL Paula KC Carvalho ACG. Interaction between resistance training and flexibility training in healthy young adults. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 842-6.

  • Rhea MR Alvar BA Burkett LN. Single versus multiple sets for strength: A meta-analysis to address the controversy. Res Quar 2002; 73:485-8.

  • Rhea MR Alvar BA Burkett LN Ball SD. A meta-analysis to determine the dose response for strength development. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35:456-64.

  • Santos E Rhea MR Simão R Dias I Salles BF Novaes J Leite T Blair JC Bunker DJ. Influence of moderately intense strength training on flexibility in sedentary young women. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 3144-9.

  • Simão R Lemos A Salles B Leite T Oliveira E Rhea M Reis VM. The influence of strength flexibility and simultaneous training on flexibility and strength gains. J Strength Cond Res 2011; 25:1333-8.

  • Simão R Farinatti PTV Polito MD Maior AS Fleck SJ. Influence of exercise order on the number of repetitions performed and perceived exertion during resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 152-6.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.414
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.858

CiteScore 2018: 1.60

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.644
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.941

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 230 81 0
PDF Downloads 100 42 1