Associations Between Dry Land Strength and Power Measurements with Swimming Performance in Elite Athletes: a Pilot Study

Open access

Associations Between Dry Land Strength and Power Measurements with Swimming Performance in Elite Athletes: a Pilot Study

The main aim of the present study was to analyze the relationships between dry land strength and power measurements with swimming performance. Ten male national level swimmers (age: 14.9 ± 0.74 years, body mass: 60.0 ± 6.26 kg, height: 171.9 ± 6.26, 100 m long course front crawl performance: 59.9 ± 1.87 s) volunteered as subjects. Height and Work were estimated for CMJ. Mean power in the propulsive phase was assessed for squat, bench press (concentric phase) and lat pull down back. Mean force production was evaluated through 30 s maximal effort tethered swimming in front crawl using whole body, arms only and legs only. Swimming velocity was calculated from a maximal bout of 50 m front crawl. Height of CMJ did not correlate with any of the studied variables. There were positive and moderate-strong associations between the work during CMJ and mean propulsive power in squat with tethered forces during whole body and legs only swimming. Mean propulsive power of bench press and lat pull down presented positive and moderate-strong relationships with mean force production in whole body and arms only. Swimming performance is related with mean power of lat pull down back. So, lat pull down back is the most related dry land test with swimming performance; bench press with force production in water arms only; and work during CMJ with tethered forces legs only.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adams TA Martin RB Yeater RA Gilson KA. Tethered force and velocity relationships. Swimming Technique 1983; Nov 83-Jan 84: 21-26.

  • Aspenes S Kjendlie PL Hoff J Helgerud J. Combined strength and endurance training in competitive swimmers. J Sports Sci Med 2009; 8:357-365.

  • Badillo JJ Marques MC. Relationship between kinematic factors and countermovement jump height in trained track and field athletes. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24(12): 3443-3447.

  • Badillo JJ Medina L. Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31(5): 347-352

  • Barbosa T Bragada J Reis V Marinho D Carvalho C Silva A. Energetics and biomechanics as determining factors of swimming performance: updating the state of the art. J Sci Med Sports 2010; 13: 262-269.

  • Bencke J Damsgaard R Saekmose A Jorgensen P Jorgensen K Klausen K. Anaerobic power and muscle strength characteristics of 11 years old elite and non-elite boys and girls from gymnastics team handball tennis and swimming. Scand J Med Sci Spor 2002; 12: 171-178.

  • Christensen CL Smith GW. Relationship of maximum sprint speed and maximal stroking force in swimming. J Swimming Res 1987; 3(2): 18-20.

  • Costill DL Rayfield F Kirwan J Thomas R. A computer based system for the measurement of force and power during front crawl swimming. J Swimming Res 1986; 2: 16-19.

  • Crowe SE Babington JP Tanner DA Stager JM. The relationship of strength to dryland power swimming power and swimming performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31(5): S255.

  • Dopsaj M Matkovic I Thanopoulos V Okicic T. Reliability and validity of basic kinematics and mechanical characteristics of pulling force in swimmers measured by the method of tethered swimming with maximum intensity of 60 seconds. Physical Education & Sport 2003; 1(10): 11-12.

  • Fomitchenko TG. Relationship between sprint speed and power capacity in different groups of swimmers. In K. Keskinen P. Komi & A. Hollander (Eds.) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming VIII. Jyvaskyla: Gummerus Printing 1999: 203-207.

  • Garrido N Marinho DA Barbosa TM Costa AM Silva AJ Pérez-Turpin JA Marques MC. Relationships between dry land strength power variables and short sprint performance in young competitive swimmers. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise 2010; 5(2): 240-249.

  • Girold S Maurin D Dugue B Chatard JC Millet G. Effects of dry-land vs. resisted- and assisted-sprint exercises on swimming sprint performances. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 599-605.

  • Hawley JA Williams MM Vickovic MM Handcock PJ. Muscle power predicts freestyle swimming performance. Brit J Sport Med 1992; 26(3): 151-155.

  • Hopper RT Hadley C Piva M Bambauer. Measurement of power delivered to an external weight. In A.P. Hollander P.A. Huijing & G. Groot (Eds.) Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IV. Champaign Illinois: Human Kinetics 1983: 113-119.

  • Johnson RE Sharp RL Hendrick MS. Relationship of swimming power and dryland power to sprint freestyle performance: a multiple regression approach. J Swim Res 1993; 9: 10-14.

  • Keskinen KL Tilli LJ Komi PV. Maximum velocity swimming: interrelationships of stroking characteristics force production and anthropometric variables. Scand J Med Sci Spor 1989; 11: 87-92.

  • Keskinen OP Keskinen KL Mero AA. Effect of pool length on blood lactate heart rate and velocity in swimming. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28: 407-413.

  • Kjendlie PL Thorsvald K. A tethered swimming power test is highly reliable. Portuguese Journal of Sport Sciences 2006; 6(S2): 231-233.

  • Magel JR. Propelling force measured during tethered swimming in the four competitive swimming styles. Res Q 1970; 41(1): 68-74.

  • Maglischo CW Maglischo EW. Tethered and nontethered crawl swimming. In J. Terauds K. Barthels E. Kreighbaum R. Mann J. Crakes C.A.D. Mar (Eds.) Proceedings of the ISBS: sports biomechanics 1984: 163-176.

  • Marques MC van den Tillaar R Vescovi JD Badillo JJ. Changes in strength and power performance in elite senior female professional volleyball players during the in-season: a case study. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 20: 563-571.

  • Medina L Badillo JJ. Velocity loss and an indicator or neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; Post Acceptance.

  • Morouço P Keskinen KL Vilas-Boas JP Fernandes RJ. Relationship between tethered forces and the four swimming techniques performance. J Appl Biomech 2011; 27(2):161-169.

  • Rohrs DM Stager JM. Evaluation of anaerobic power and capacity in competitive swimmers. J Swim Res 1991; 7(3): 12-16.

  • Sharp RL Troup JP Costill DL. Relationship between power and sprint freestyle swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 53-56.

  • Stager JM Coyle MA. Energy Systems. In J. Stager & D. Tanner (Eds.) Swimming - Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science. Massachusetts: Blackwell Science 2005: 1-19.

  • Strzala M Tyka A Krezalek. Swimming technique and biometric and functional indices of young swimmers in relation to front crawl swimming velocity. Hum Movement 2007; 8(2): 112-119.

  • Strzala M Tyka A. Physical endurance somatic indices and swimming technique parameters as determinants of front crawl swimming speed at short distances in young swimmers. Medicina Sportiva 2009; 13: 99-107.

  • Swaine IL Hunter AM Carlton KJ Wiles JD Coleman D. Reproducibility of limb power outputs and cardiopulmonary responses to exercise using a novel swimming training machine. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 854-859.

  • Swaine IL. Arm and leg power output in swimmers during simulated swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1288-1292.

  • Tanaka H Costill DL Thomas R Fink WJ Widrick JJ. Dry-land resistance training for competitive swimming. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993; 25: 952-959.

  • Taylor SR Stratton G MacLaren DPM Lees A. A longitudinal study of tethered swimming force in competitive age group swimmers. Portuguese J Sport Sci 2003a; 3(2): 75-78.

  • Taylor SR MacLaren D Stratton G Lees A. The effects of age maturation and growth on tethered swimming performance. In J.C. Chatard (Ed.) Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX. Saint-Étienne 2003b: 185-190.

  • Wilke K Madsen O. Coaching the Young Swimmer. Sports Support Syndicate 1990.

  • Yeater RA Martin RB White MK Gilson KH. Tethered swimming forces in the crawl breast and back strokes and their relationship to competitive performance. J Biomech 1981; 14(8): 527-537.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.414
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.858

CiteScore 2018: 1.60

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.644
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.941

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 501 382 16
PDF Downloads 388 346 13