Perennial Philology and the Ideal of the White Overall

Open access

Abstract

Joining the university context in the middle of the 19th century, Philology served as a comprehensive basis for what nowadays is meant by literary and linguistic studies. Depending on the specialization tendency that would settle down in the academic context (with regard to either the formative offer or the foundation of various research fields), each of these areas followed separate or even divergent paths, losing, to a great extent, the contact with its initial basis. Despite this state of affairs, Philology has displayed a strong capacity of resistance, maintaining its traditional dimension active or going through metamorphoses that resulted from the incorporation of new technologies, as well as from the epistemological adjustment that enabled it to overcome its first positivist stages. Trying to find a new place inside the general framework of Social Sciences and Humanities, literary studies need to recover its order and credibility, two factors that the new face of Philology can inspire. The present study aims at reconstructing the most recent trajectory undergone by this field of research and education, by identifying a space of reconnection that already seems to be adequate and beneficial.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bernardes J. A. C. (2011). “Os Estudos Literários na Universidade”. Pensar a Liter@tura no século XXI. João Amadeu Carvalho da Silva José Cândido de Oliveira Martins & Miguel Gonçalves. Orgs. Braga Faculdade de Filosofia. 27-52;

  • Blecua J. M. (red.) et alii. (1999). Filología e informática. Nuevas tecnologias en los estúdios filológicos. Madrid: Editorial Milenio S.L.

  • Buescu H. (2013). Experiência do incomum e boa vizinhança. Porto: Porto Editora. Citton Y. (2007). Lire interpréter actualiser. Pourquoi les etudes littéraires?. Paris : Éditions Amsterdam.

  • Citton Y. (2010). L’Avenir des humanités. Économie de la connaissance ou cultures de l’interprétation?. Paris La Découverte.

  • Camões J. and Sales J. N. (2010). “Who’s in a name”. in A Custódia de Belém. 500 anos Lisboa: Museu Nacional de Arte Antiga.

  • Crane G. et alii (2013). “ePhilology: When The Books Talk to Their Readers” A Companion to Digital Literary Studies (Edited by Ray Siemens and Susan Schreibman). London: Wiley-Blackwell pp. 29-64.

  • Cunha C. F. da. (2002). A construção do discurso da história literária portuguesa no século XIX. Braga: Centro de Estudos Humanísticos.

  • Cunha C. F. Da (2009). O nascimento da literatura portuguesa Braga: Nova Educação.

  • Earle T. F. (2013). “Dois comentários setecentistas sobre a obra poética de Francisco de Sá de Miranda”. Estudos sobre cultura e literatura portuguesa do Renascimento. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade. 91-105;

  • Espagne M. and M. Warner. Sous la direction de. (1998). Philologiques I. Contributions à l'histoire des disciplines littéraires en France et en Allemagne au XIX siècle.

  • Franco M. A. dir. (2011). Tágides. Revista de Literatura Cultura e Arte Portuguesas. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Literatura Portuguesa da USP.

  • Funaioli G. (2007). Lineamenti di una storia della Filologia a traverso i secoli. Bologna: Zanichelli Editore.

  • Graff G. and M. Warner. Orgs. (1989). The Origins of Literary Studies in America. A Documentary Anthology. London: Routledge.

  • Guillory J. (2002). "Literary Study and the Modern System of Disciplines" in Amanda Anderson and Joseph Valente (edited by) Disciplinarity at the FIN DE SIÈCLE Princeton Princeton University Press.19-43.

  • Gumbrecht H. U. (1986). “Un souffle d’Allemagne ayant passé: Friedrich Diez Gaston Paris and the genesis of national philologies”. Romance Philology. XL. 1. 1-37.

  • Gumbrecht H. U. (1998). “The Origins of Literary Studies and their End”. Stanford Humanities. Review 6. 1. 1-10.

  • Gumbrecht H. U. (2003). The Powers of Philology. Dynamics of Thextuality Scholarship. Illinois: University of Illinois.

  • Gumbrecht H. U. (2004). Production of Presence. What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Hummel P. (2000). Histoire de l'histoire de la Philologie. Étude d'un genre épistémologieque et bibliographique. Genève : Droz.

  • Hummel P. (2009). Philologia. Recueil de textes sur la philologie. Paris : Philologicum.

  • Hummel P. (2011). La Philologie au parloir. Entretiens réalisés para Pascale Hummel. Paris: Philologicum.

  • Harpham G. G. (2011). The Humanities and the Dream of America. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

  • Hummel P. and Frédéric G. Textes réunis par. (2008). Études sur les notions de vérité et de fausseté en matière de philologie. Paris : Philologicum.

  • Llovet J. (2011). Adios a la Universidad. El eclipse de las Humanidades. Barcelona: Galaxia Guttenberg.

  • Kernan A. ed. (1997). What’s Hapenned To The Humanities? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Mainer J.-C. (2003). La filología en el purgatorio. Los estudios literarios en torno a 1950. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.

  • Mcgann J. (2013). “Coda: Why digital textual scholarship matters or philology un a new key”. The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship (edited by Neil Fraistat and Julia Flanders) Cambridge University Press. 274-2; University New York/London w.w. Norton & Company.

  • Menard L. (2010). The Marketplace of Ideas. Reform and Resistance in the American. New York London: W. W. Norton and Company.

  • Numerico T. D. Fiormonte and F. Tomasi. (2010). L’ umanista digitale. Milano: Il Mulino.

  • Prista L. (2012). “De Jesus ao Campo Grande entre filologia e literatura”. Românica. 21. 17- 56.

  • Prista L. (2013). “O ensino linguístico e de literatura”. Universidade de Lisboa Séculos XIX-XX Vol. II (Coordenação de Sérgio Campos Matos e Jorge Ramos do Ó). pp. 982-1085.

  • Renker E. (2007). The Origins of American Literary Studies. An Institutional History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Silva V. M. Aguiar. (2010). As Humanidades os Estudos Culturais o Ensino da Literatura e a política de Língua Portuguesa. Coimbra: Livraria Almedina.

  • Silvestre O. M. (2012). “O ensino da literatura contemporânea na universidade. O caso americano”. Românica. 21. 57-80.

  • Todorov T. (2002). Devoirs et délices. Une vie de passeur. Entretiens avec Catherine Portevin. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

  • Varvaro A. (2012). Prima lezione di filologia. Roma-Bari: Gius Laterza & Figli.

  • Vecchi R. (2012). “Bolonha em Bologna (Um ponto de vista disciplinar)”. Românica. 21. 81-90.

  • Verdelho T. (2013). “A Língua e a Literatura. Reflexões para uma pedagogia coalescente”. Revista de Estudos Literários. 3. 23-64.

  • Warner M. (1990). “A propos de la notion de philologie moderne. Problèmes de definition dans l’espace franco-alemand”. Philologiques I. Contribution à l’histoire des disciplines littéraires en France et en Allemagne au XIX e siècle dir. De Michel Espagne e Michael Warner Paris : Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 218 107 2
PDF Downloads 67 47 0