Physico-chemical properties of Rhododendron honey produced in Turkey

Open access


Rhododendron honey is a monofloral honey and it is collected from the flowers of Rhododendron species widely spreading over many countries, mainly in America, Turkey, Indonesia, Australia. It is belived that Rhododendron honey treats several disorders and is used traditionally as an alternative medicine. The determination of the chemical characteristics of the Rhododendron honey is essential for public health. In this research, the physicochemical characteristics of Rhododendron, chestnut and flower honey samples collected from beekeepers in Turkey were determined and compared. Physico-chemical parameters such as moisture, acidity, sucrose, invert sugar, fructose/glucose, conductivity, diastase and hydroxymethylfurfural were analysed in each honey sample. According to the results obtained, no differences were found in physico-chemical properties of Rhododendron, honey samples, except from moisture and acidity compared with those of chestnut and flower honeys. In order to differentiate Rhododendron honeys, new methods should be developed. This honey should be reintroduced to medicine and used in pharmaceutical industry

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Eraslan G Kanbur M Silici S Karabacak M. Beneficial effect of pine honey on trichlorfon induced some biochemical alterations in mice. Ecotoxic Environm Saf 2010; 73:1084-1091.

  • 2. Sanz ML Gonzalez M De Lorenzo C Sanz J Martinez-Castro I. Carbohydrate composition and physicochemical properties of artisanal honeys from Madrid (Spain): occurrence of Echium sp honey. J Sci Food Agric 2004; 84:1577-1584.

  • 3. Guler A Bakan A Nisbet C Yavuz O. Determination of important biochemical properties of honey to discriminate pure and adulterated honey with sucrose (Saccharum officinarum L.) syrup. Food Chem 2007; 105:1119-1125.

  • 4. Misirlioglu A Eroglu S Karacaoglan N Akan M Akoz T Yildirim S. Use of honey as an adjunct in the healing of split-thickness skin graft donor site. Derm Sur 2003; 29:168-172.

  • 5. Molan P. Potential of honey in the treatment of wounds and burns. Am J Clin Derm 2001; 2(1):13-19.

  • 6. Molan P. Re-Introducing honey in the management of wound and ulcers-theory and practice. Ostomy Wound Man Nov 2002a; 48(11):28-43.

  • 7. Orhan F Sekerel BE Kocabas CN Sackesen C Adalioglu G Tuncer A. Complemantry and alternative medicine in children with asthma. Ann All Asth Immun 2003; 90:611-615.

  • 8. Molan P. Not all honeys are the same for wound healing. Eur Tissue Repair Soc Bull 2002b; 9:5-6.

  • 9. Bradbear N. Bees and their role in forest livelihoods A guide to the services provided by bees and the sustainable harvesting processing and marketing of their products. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome 2009.

  • 10. Gunduz A Bostan H Turedi S Nuhoglu I Patan T. Wild flowers and mad honey. Wilderness Environ Med 2007; 18:69-71.

  • 11. Avci M. Ormangülleri (Rhododendron L.) ve Türkiye’deki Doğal Yayilişlari. Istanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Coğrafya Bölümü Coğrafya Dergisi 2004; 12:13-29.

  • 12. Oztasan N Altinkaynak K Akcay F Gocer F Dane S. Effects of Mad Honey on Blood Glucose and lipid levels in rats with strptozocin-induced diabetes. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2005; 29:1093-1096.

  • 13. Silici S. 2010a. Rhododendron (ormangülü) bali hakkinda bilgilendirme toplantisi. tr/downloads/orman_gulu_rhododendronbali.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2012.

  • 14. Erturk O. The Antibacterial and Antifungal Effects of Rhododendron Derived Mad Honey and Extracts of Four Rhododendron Species. Turk J Biol 2009; 33:151-158.

  • 15. Silici S Sagdic O Ekici L. Total phenolic content antiradical antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Rhododendron honeys. Food Chem 2010b; 121:238-234.

  • 16. AOAC. Official Methods 969.38 962.19 958.09 980.23 920.183 and 925.46. In Helrich K. (ed.): 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington VA USA 1990.

  • 17. Lašáková D Nagy J Kasperová J. Comparison of water content and electric conductivity in honey of various origin. Folia Veter 2009; 53(1):31-34.

  • 18. Turk Gida Kodeksi. Bal Tebligi. Teblig no:2012/58 Resmi Gazete 28366. eskiler/2012/07/20120727-12.htm.

  • 19. Bogdanov S Peter M. Honey Authenticity: A Review. Swiss Bee Research Centre 2002; 1-20.

  • 20. Kucuk M Kolayli S Karaoglu S Ulusoy E Baltaci C Candan F. Biological activities and chemical composition of three honeys of different types from Anatolia. Food Chem 2007; 100:526-534.

  • 21. Oddo LP Piro R. Main European unifloral honeys: descriptive sheets. Api 2004; 35:38-81.

  • 22. Ghidini S Mercanti C Dalcanale E Pinalli R Bracchi PG. Italian honey authentication. Ann Fac Medic Vet di Parma 2008; 28:113-120.

  • 23. White JW. Detection of honey adulteration by carbohydrates analysis. J Ass Off Anal Chem 1980; 63:11-18.

  • 24. White JW Riethof M Subers M Kushmir I. Composition of American honey. USDA Tech Bull 1962; 1261:1-124.

  • 25. Oddo LP Piazza MG Sabatini AG Accorti M. Characterization of unifloral honeys. Api 1995; 26:453-465.

  • 26. Devillers J Morlot M Pham-Delegue MH Dore JC. Classification of monofloral honeys based on their quality control data. Food Chem 2004; 86:305-312.

  • 27. Escuredo O Seijo MC Fernandez-Gonzalez M. Descriptive analysis of Rubus honey from the north-west of Spain. Intern J Food Sci Tech 2011; 46:2329-2336.

  • 28. Mendes E Brojo PE Ferreira IMPLVO Ferreira MA. Quality evaluation of Portuguese honey. Carbohydrate Poly 1998; 37(3):219-223.

  • 29. Terrab A Diez MJ Heredia FJ. Characterisation of Moroccan unifloral honeys by their physico-chemical characteristics. Food Chem 2002; 79:373-379.

  • 30. Oddo LP Baldi E Accorti M. Diastatic activity in some unifloral honeys. Api 1990; 21:17-24.

  • 31. Singh N Bath PK Narpinder S. Relationship between heating and hydroxymethylfurfural formation in different honey types. J Food Sci Tech 1998; 35:154-156.

  • 32. Zappalà M Fallico B Arena E Verzera A. Methods for the determination of HMF in honey: a comparison. Food Cont 2005; 16:273-277.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 348 181 7
PDF Downloads 104 72 1