Frondizi and Mandelbaum on the Phenomenology and Ontology of Value

Open access

Summary

In this article the ethical systems of Risieri Frondizi and Maurice Mandelbaum, both decisively influenced by Wolfgang Köhler, are investigated for the first time. Each writer took different things from Köhler, Frondizi the idea of value as a Gestalt quality and Mandelbaum the idea of value as a felt demand. Their positions are highly complementary and Frondizi’s axiological approach enlightens the ontology of value whereas Mandelbaum’s phenomenological approach clarifies the nature of “requiredness” (Köhler) or “fittingness.”

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alexander S. (1920). Space time and deity: The Gifford lectures at Glasgow 1916–1918. London England: MacMillan.

  • Asch S. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall p. 1952.

  • Bozzi P. (1969). Presentazione. In W. Köhler (Ed.) Il posto di valore in un mondo di fatti. Florence Italy: Giunti.

  • Broad C. D. (1930). Five types of ethical theory. London England: Routledge Kegan & Paul.

  • Chrudzimski A. & Huemer W. (Eds.). (2004). Phenomenology and analysis: Essays on central European philosophy. Frankfurt Germany: Ontos Verlag.

  • Dreyfus H. (2005). Overcoming the myth of the mental: How philosophers can profit from the phenomenology of everyday expertise. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79 47–65.

  • Dreyfus H. & Dreyfus S. (1990). What is morality? A phenomenological account of the development of ethical expertise. In D. Rasmussen (Ed.) Universalism and communitarianism (pp. 237–264). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Duncker K. (1939). Ethical relativity? Mind: A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy 48 39–57.

  • Ewing A. C. (1947). The definition of good. New York NY: Macmillan.

  • Frankena W. (1967). Frondizi on the foundations of moral norms. In Proceedings of the Seventh Interamerican Congress of Philosophy. Quebec: Universite Laval.

  • Frondizi R. (1968). Risposta a Frankena. Rivista di Filosofia 49 203–213.

  • Frondizi R. (1969). The axiological foundation of the moral norm. The Personalist 50 241–253.

  • Frondizi R. (1972). Value as a gestalt quality. Journal of Value Inquiry 6 163–184.

  • Frondizi R. (1977). Introducción a los problemas fundamentales del Hombre. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

  • Frondizi R. (Spanish: 1958 English: 1971). What is value? An introduction to axiology. La Salle IL: Open Court.

  • Groff R. (2013). Ontology revisited: Metaphysics in social and political philosophy. London England: Routledge.

  • Hartman R. S. (2002). The knowledge of good: A critique of axiological reason. Amsterdam The Netherlands: Rodopi.

  • Hatfield G. (2004). Sense-data and the mind body problem. In R. Schumacher (Ed.) Perception and reality: From Descartes to the present (pp. 305–331). Paderborn Germany: Mentis.

  • Hatfield G. (2007). The reality of qualia. Erkenntnis 66 133–168.

  • Heider F. (1946). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review 51 358–374.

  • Horgan T. & Timmons M. (2005). Moral phenomenology and moral theory. Philosophical Issues [Normativity] 15 56–77.

  • Horgan T. & Timmons M. (2008). What does moral phenomenology tell us about moral objectivity? Social Philosophy and Policy 25 267–300.

  • Huemer W. (2005). The constitution of consciousness: A study in analytic phenomenology. New York NY: Routledge.

  • Koffka K. (1935). The ontological status of value. In M. Kallen & S. Hook (Eds.) American philosophy today and tomorrow (pp. 275–309). New York NY: Lee Furman.

  • Köhler W. (1938). The place of value in a world of facts. New York NY: Liveright.

  • Köhler W. (1971). Value and fact. In M. Henle (Ed.) The selected papers of Wolfgang Köhler (pp. 356–375). New York NY: Liveright.

  • Kriegel U. (2007). Moral phenomenology: Foundational issues. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 115–136.

  • Lewin K. (1951). Behavior and development as a function of the total situation. In D. Cartwright (Ed.) Field theory in social science (pp. 238–305). New York NY: Harper.

  • Mackie J. L. (1977). Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. Harmondsworth London: Penguin.

  • Mandelbaum M. (1955). The phenomenology of moral experience. Glencoe Scotland: Free Press.

  • Mandelbaum M. (1956). On the use of moral principles. Journal of Philosophy 53 662–670.

  • Mandelbaum M. (1960). Determinism and moral responsibility. Ethics 70 204–219.

  • Mandelbaum M. (1964). Philosophy science and sense-perception. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Mandelbaum M. (1986). The determinants of choice. Philosophy Research Archive 11 355–377.

  • Mandelbaum M. (1987). Purpose and necessity in social theory. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Marietta D. (2004). Beyond certainty: A phenomenological approach to moral reflection. Lanham MD: Lexington Book.

  • McDowell J. (1985). Value and secondary qualities. In T. Honderich (Ed.) Morality and objectivity (pp. 110–129). London England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • McDowell J. (2007). What myth? Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization Provision and Financing 50 338–351.

  • Metzger W. (1962). Schöpferische Freiheit. Frankfurt Germany: Kramer.

  • Norris C. (2002). Truth matters: Realism anti-realism and response-dependence. Edinburgh Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

  • Passmore J. (1973). Review of Mandelbaum Maurice. History Man and ReasonHistory and Theory 12 414–419.

  • Rietveld E. (2010). McDowell and Dreyfus on unreflective action. Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization Provision and Financing 53 183–207.

  • Ross W. D. (1939). Foundations of ethics. Oxford England: Oxford University Press.

  • Sartre J.-P. (2003). Being and nothingness. London England: Routledge.

  • Smith B. (1988). Gestalt theory: An essay in philosophy. In B. Smith (Ed.) Foundations of gestalt theory (pp. 11–81). Munich Germany and Vienna Austria: Philosophia.

  • Smith B. (1994). Austrian philosophy: The legacy of Franz Brentano. Chicago and La Salle IL: Open Court.

  • Strawson G. (1994). Mental reality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Timmons M. & Horgan T. (2010). Mandelbaum on moral phenomenology and moral realism. In I. Verstegen (Ed.) Maurice Mandelbaum and American critical realism (pp. 105–126). London England: Routledge.

  • von Ehrenfels C. (1897). System der Werttheorie vol. I Allgemeine Werttheorie: Psychologie des Begehrens. Leipzig Germany: Reisland.

  • von Ehrenfels C. (1898). System der Werttheorie vol. II Grundzüge einer Ethik. Leipzig Germany: Reisland.

  • von Ehrenfels C. (1916). Höhe und Reinheit der Gestalt. Kosmogonie. Jena Germany: Diederichs.

  • von Ehrenfels C. (German: 1890; English: 1988). On Gestalt qualities. In B. Smith (Ed.) Foundations of gestalt theory (pp. 124–157). Munich Germany and Vienna Austria: Philosophia.

  • von Hildebrand D. (1916). Die Idee der sittlichen Handlung. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 3 126–251.

  • Weiner B. (1986). An attributional theory of emotion and motivation. Berlin Germany: Springer.

  • Wertheimer M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psychologische Forschung 4 301–350.

  • Wertheimer M. (1961). Some problems in the theory of ethics. In M. Henle (Ed.) Documents of Gestalt psychology (pp. 29–41). Berkeley and Los Angeles CA: University of California Press.

  • Zahavi D. (2010). Mindedness mindlessness and first-person authority. In J. Schear (Ed.) Mind reason and being-in-the-world: The McDowell–Dreyfus debate London England: Routledge.

  • Zukier H. (1982). Situational determinants of behavior. Social Research 49 1073–1091.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 12 12 12
PDF Downloads 9 9 9