Manifest Dream/Association Comparison: A Criterion to Monitor the Psychotherapeutic Field (2nd part) Field Transformations: A Clinical Case

Open access

Summary

The present work focuses on the transformations of the psychotherapeutic field through the relationship dynamics that occur within it.

The first part of this article starts with a brief outline of the Gestalt psychological understanding of the field concept, also in its application to the psychotherapeutic situation, followed by a brief review of the introduction of the field concept into the psychoanalytic theory formation.

After this, the first author first presents the theoretical concept underlying a new approach he has developed for observing the relationship dynamics in psychotherapy. Mirroring a formation both psychoanalytic and gestaltic of the main author, this new approach is based on the combination of psychoanalytic and Gestalt psychological concepts. According to the clinical experience and insights of the author, the phenomenological and relational approach of Gestalt theory fits well with the psychoanalytic approach; on this basis, a criterion for recording the progress of therapy can be developed. This criterion is the phenomenology of the development of the qualities of the relationships of the client, as they become visible in his dream narrations and the subsequent associations in the analysis room, and continue to develop during the session and the further course of therapy. The relationship dynamics in the dream narration is thus compared with those that develop in the course of the subsequent associations.

This is demonstrated and further elaborated in the second part of this paper on the basis of a clinical case. The clinical example shows how the relationship dynamics develop in this sense in the individual therapy sessions and over a longer course of therapy. The associated transformations of the therapeutic field give a good indication of the progress of therapy. The main author gained such insights into the transformations of the therapeutic field and the progression of therapy, which are visible in the course of therapy, from the careful application of the criterion “manifest dream/associations comparison of relational dynamics”. In the specific case, there was also a high degree of correspondence between the results of the application of this phenomenological criterion and the empirical evidence of the symptom questionnaire, a self-report measure requested by the patient himself during the course of the therapy.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • (for part one and two of this article)

  • Albarella C. (2004). L’isteria: intervista a Christopher Bollas. In C. Albarella & A. Racalbuto (a cura di) Isteria (pp. 207–220). Roma: Borla.

  • Baranger M. & Baranger W. (1961/2 in 2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 89 795–826.

  • Baranger M. & Baranger W. (2018). Die analytische Situation als dynamisches Feld. (deutsche Übersetzung von Baranger 1961/2). Psyche 77(9) 734–738.

  • Bezoari M. & Ferro A. (1982). Il sogno all’interno di una teoria del campo: aggregati funzionali e narrazioni. In E. Gaburri (a cura di 1997) Emozione e interpretazione. Torino: Bollati Borlinghieri.

  • Bion W. R. (1963). Gli elementi della psicoanalisi. Roma: Armando 1973.

  • Blum H. P. (2011). Sogni rivisitati. Rivista di Psicoanalisi 2 385–388.

  • Bolognini S. (2008). Passaggi segreti. Torino: Bollati Borlinghieri.

  • Bolognini S. (2016). Elementi di tecnica tra Sé e non-Sé. Rivista di Psicoanalisi 62(1) 5–25.

  • De Toffoli C. (2014). Transiti corpo-mente. Milano: Franco Angeli.

  • Falci A. (2005). Sulla definizione di fattori aspecifici nella terapia psicoanalitica. In G. Berti Ceroni (a cura di) Come cura la psicoanalisi (pp. 157–171). Milano: Franco Angeli.

  • Ferro A. (2002). Fattori di malattia fattori di guarigione. Genesi della sofferenza e cura psicoanalitica. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

  • Ferro A. (2003). Das bipersonale Feld. Konstruktivismus und Feldtheorie in der Kinderanalyse. Gießen: Psycho-sozial Verlag.

  • Ferro A. (2005). Rèflexions à propos de l’interprètation. Bulletin de la FEP 59 44–46.

  • Ferro A. & Civitarese G. (2015). Il campo analitico e le sue trasformazioni. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

  • Galli G. (1997). Beziehungen zwischen Lewins wissenschaftlichen Begriffen und der Psychoanalyse. Gestalt Theory 19(2) 80–89. In Galli 2017 107–115.

  • Galli G. (2005). Psychologie der sozialen Tugenden. (2. Auflage). Wien: Böhlau.

  • Galli G. (2017). Der Mensch als Mit-Mensch. Aufsätze zur Gestalttheorie in Forschung Anwendung und Dialog. Mit Beiträgen von Anna Arfelli Galli und Giancarlo Trombini. Herausgegeben und eingeleitet von Gerhard Stem-berger. Wien: Krammer.

  • Grotstein J. S. (1983). Some perspectives of self-psychology. In A. Goldberg (ed.) The future of psychoanalysis. New York: International University Press.

  • Hochheimer W. (1953). Die Rolle des Unbewussten im zwischenmenschlichen Verhalten. Psyche 7(3) 161–184. In Hochheimer 1986 215-240.

  • Hochheimer W. (1954). Zur Analyse des therapeutischen Feldes. Psyche 7(11) 648–675. In Hochheimer 1986 241–272.

  • Hochheimer W. (1986). Tiefenpsychologie und Kritische Anthropologie. Hrsg. von Reinhart Wolff Band I. Basel/Frankfurt: Stroemfeld/Roter Stern

  • Kästl R. (2011). Zur Therapeutin-Klientin-Beziehung in der Gestalttheoretischen Psychotherapie. Phänomenal – Zeitschrift für Gestalttheoretische Psychotherapie 3(2) 19–21.

  • Katz S. M. (2017). Contemporary psychoanalytic field theory: stories dreams and metaphor. New York: Routledge.

  • Kellner R. (1987). A symptom questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychiatric 48 268–273.

  • Lewin K. (1926). Vorsatz Wille und Bedürfnis. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Lewin K. (1946/1997). Verhalten und Entwicklung als eine Funktion der Gesamtsituation (1946). English version: behavior and development as a function of the total situation. In: D. Cartwright (ed.) Field theory in social science. Selected theoretical papers (pp. 262–278). Washington: A.P.A.

  • Mazzacane F. (2013). Le vicissitudini del campo analitico. In A. Ferro (a cura di) Psicoanalisi oggi. Roma: Carocci Ed.

  • Metzger W. (1962). Schöpferische Freiheit. 2. Auflage. Frankfurt: Waldemar Kramer.

  • Metzger W. (1972). The phenomenal-perceptual field as a central steering mechanism. In J. R. Royce and W. W. Rozeboom (eds.) The psychology of knowing (pp. 241–265). New York/Paris/London: Gordon and Breach.

  • Metzger W. (1982). Möglichkeiten der Verallgemeinerung des Prägnanzprinzips. Gestalt Theory 4(1/2) 3–22.

  • Neri C. (2007). La nozione allargata di campo in psicoanalisi. Rivista di Psicoanalisi 53(1) 103–134.

  • Ogden T. H. (2009). Rediscovering psychoanalysis. Thinking and dreaming learning and forgetting. Hove East Sussex: Routledge.

  • Panizza S. (2006). Per una psicoanalisi bipersonale. Milano: Franco Angeli.

  • Rausch E. (1966). Das Eigenschaftsproblem in der Gestalttheorie der Wahrnehmung. In W. Metzger & H. Erke (eds.) Wahrnehmung und Bewusstsein. Handbuch der Psychologie 11 (S. 866–953). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

  • Rausch E. (1982). Bild und Wahrnehmung – Psychologische Studien ausgehend von Graphiken Volker Bußmanns. Frankfurt/M: Waldemar Kramer.

  • Robutti A. (1992). Incontro a un crocevia. In L. Nissim Momigliano & A. Robutti (a cura di) L’esperienza condivisa. Saggi sulla relazione psicoanalitica (pp. 11–19). Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

  • Sharpe E. F. (1937). Dream analysis. London: The Hogart Press.

  • Solano L. (2013). Tra mente e corpo. Nuova edizione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

  • Stemberger G. (2009a). Feldprozesse in der Psychotherapie. Der Mehr-Felder-Ansatz im diagnostischen und therapeutischen Prozess. Phänomenal – Zeitschrift für Gestalttheoretische Psychotherapie 1(1) 12–19.

  • Stemberger G. (2009b). La molteplicità dell’Io e del suo ambiente. Il principio della molteplicità dei campi e le sue potenzialità nei processi diagnostici e terapeutici. In A. Zuczkowski & I. Bianchi (a cura di) L’analisi qualitativa dell’esperienza diretta. Festschrift in onore di Giuseppe Galli (pp. 275–282). Roma: Aracne.

  • Stemberger G. (2018). Über die Fähigkeit an zwei Orten gleichzeitig zu sein. Ein Mehr-Felder-Ansatz zum Verständnis menschlichen Erlebens. Gestalt Theory 40(2) 117–131.

  • Tholey P. (1998). Feldtheorien in Biologie Biophysik Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften. Ein bisher unveröffentlichter Kommentar (1995) aus dem Nachlass von Paul Tholey. Mit einer Einleitung von Gerhard Stemberger. ÖAGP-Informationen 7(5) iii–ix.

  • Tholey P. & Stemberger G. (2009). Feldkonzepte psychologische. Lexikon zur Gestalttheoretischen Psychotherapie. Phänomenal – Zeitschrift für Gestalttheoretische Psychotherapie 1(1) 34.

  • Trombini E. & Trombini G. (2006). Focal Play-Therapy in the extended child-parents context. A clinical case. Gestalt Theory28(4) 375–388.

  • Trombini G. (1970). Das Selbermachenwollen des Kindes im Bereich der Ernährung und Entleerung. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie 19(1) 1–10.

  • Trombini G. (1994). Clinica psicologica e somatizzazione. In G. Trombini (a cura di) Introduzione alla clinica psicologica (pp. 76–102). Bologna: Zanichelli.

  • Trombini G. (1995). Una promessa implicita nella terapia psicoanalitica: la relazione armonica con il paziente. In G. Galli (a cura di) Atti XV colloquio sull’interpretazione “Interpretazione e promessa” (pp. 127–135). Pisa: Giardini.

  • Trombini G. (1998). Strutture pregnanti nella dinamica delle relazioni cliniche. In M. W. Battacchi M. Bosinelli P. E. Ricci-Bitti & G. Trombini (a cura di) Le ragioni della psicologia. Saggi in onore di Renzo Canestrari (pp. 301–308). Milano: Franco Angeli.

  • Trombini G. (2014). Transferential relationships as field phenomena. The relationship dynamics in the light of the manifest dream. Gestalt Theory 36(1) 43–68.

  • Trombini G. (2015). La dinamica transferale alla luce del sogno manifesto e delle associazioni. Rivista di Psicoanalisi 61(1) 45–64.

  • Turillazzi Manfredi S. (1982). Due scopi per la psicoanalisi: verità e cambiamento. In G. Di Chiara (a cura di) Itinerari della psicoanalisi (pp. 250–278). Torino: Loescher.

  • Vallino D. & Macciò M. (2004). Essere neonati. Roma: Borla.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 16 16 16
PDF Downloads 12 12 12