Embodied Simulation. Its Bearing on Aesthetic Experience and the Dialogue Between Neuroscience and the Humanities

Open access

Summary

Embodied simulation, a basic functional mechanism of our brain, and its neural underpinnings are discussed and connected to intersubjectivity and the reception of human cultural artefacts, like visual arts and film. Embodied simulation provides a unified account of both non-verbal and verbal aspects of interpersonal relations that likely play an important role in shaping not only the self and his/her relation to others, but also shared cultural practices. Embodied simulation sheds new light on aesthetic experience and is proposed as a key element for the dialogue between neuroscience and the humanities within the biocultural paradigm.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Angelini M. Calbi M. Ferrari A. Sbriscia-Fioretti B. Franca M. Gallese V. & Umiltà M.A. (2015). Motor inhibition during overt and covert actions: An electrical neuroimaging study. PLoS One 10(5). e0126800.

  • Ardizzi M. Ferroni F. Siri F. Umiltà M.A. Cotti A. Calbi M.…Gallese V. (2018). Beholders’ sensorimotor engagement enhances aesthetic rating of pictorial facial expressions of pain. Psychological Research Aug 3. [Epub ahead of print].

  • Bordwell D. (1977) Camera movement and cinematic space Ciné-Tracts 2 19-25.

  • Caggiano V. Fogassi L. Rizzolatti G. Pomper J. K. Thier P. Giese M.A. & Casile A. (2011). View-based encoding of actions in mirror neurons of area f5 in macaque premotor cortex. Current Biology21(2) 144-8.

  • Casadei A. (2018). Biologia della Letteratura. Corpo Stile Storia. Milano: Il Saggiatore.

  • Cometa M. (2018a). Perché le storie ci aiutano a vivere. La letteratura Necessaria. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

  • Cometa M. (2018b). Letteratura e darwinismo. Introduzione alla biopoetica. Roma: Carocci Editore.

  • Freedberg D. & Gallese V. (2007). Motion emotion and empathy in aesthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences11 197-203.

  • Gallese V. (2000). The inner sense of action: Agency and motor representations. Journal of Consciousness Studies7 23-40.

  • Gallese V. (2001). The “Shared Manifold” Hypothesis: from mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies8 N° 5-7 33-50.

  • Gallese V. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 358 517-528.

  • Gallese V. (2005). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 23-48.

  • Gallese V. (2007). Before and below theory of mind: Embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B362 659-669.

  • Gallese V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience 3 317-333.

  • Gallese V. (2009). Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood. Psychol Res73(4) 486-498.

  • Gallese V. (2011) Embodied simulation theory: Imagination and memory. Neuropsychoanalysis13(2) 196-200.

  • Gallese V. (2012). Aby Warburg and the dialogue among aesthetics biology and physiology. Ph 2 48-62.

  • Gallese V. (2014). Bodily selves in relation: Embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369 20130177 published 28 April 2014.

  • Gallese V. (2016). Finding the body in the brain. From simulation theory to embodied simulation. In H. Kornblith & B. McLaughlin (Ed.). Alvin Goldman and his Critics. (297-317). New York: Blackwell.

  • Gallese V. (2017). Visions of the body: Embodied simulation and aesthetic experience. Aisthesis 1(1) 41–50.

  • Gallese V. (2018a). Embodied simulation and its role in cognition. Reti Saperi Linguaggi in press.

  • Gallese V. (2018b). The power of images: A view from the brain-body. Phenomenology and Mind14 70–79.

  • Gallese V. (2019). A bodily take on aesthetics. Performativity and embodied simulation. In

  • Gallese V. Fadiga L. Fogassi L. & Rizzolatti G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119 593–609.

  • Gallese V. Keysers C. & Rizzolatti G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends Cognitive Sciences8 396–403.

  • Gallese V. Rochat M. Cossu G. & Sinigaglia C. (2009). Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of action understanding. Developmental Psychology45 103–113.

  • Gallese V. & Cuccio V. (2015). The paradigmatic body. Embodied simulation intersubjectivity and the bodily self. In T. Metzinger & J. M. Windt (Ed.). Open MIND. (1–23). Frankfurt: MIND Group.

  • Gallese V. & Guerra M. (2015). Lo Schermo Empatico: Cinema e Neuroscienze. Milan: Raffaello Cortina Editore.

  • Gambino R. & Pulvirenti G. (2018). Storie Menti Mondi. Approccio Neuroermeneutico alla Lelleratura. Milano-Udine: Mimesis.

  • Glenberg A. & Gallese V. (2012) Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition production and comprehension. Cortex48(7) 905-22.

  • Goldman A. & Gallese V. (2000). Reply to Schulkin. Trends in Cognitive Sciences4 255-256.

  • Heimann K. Umiltà M. A. & Gallese V. (2013). How the motor-cortex distinguishes among letters unknown symbols and scribbles. A high density EEG study. Neuropsychologia51 2833-2840.

  • Heimann K. Umiltà M. A. Guerra M. & Gallese V. (2014). Moving mirrors: A high density EEG study investigating the effects of camera movements on motor cortex activation during action observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience26(9) 2087-2101.

  • Heimann K. Calbi M. Umiltà M.A. Guerra M. Fingerhut J. & Gallese V. (2019). Embodying the camera: An EEG study on the effect of camera movements on film spectators' sensorimotor cortex activation. PloS ONE in press.

  • Hildebrand von A. (1893). Das Problem der Form in der Bildenden Kunst. Strasbourg: Heitz.

  • Hodder I. (2012). Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.

  • Kracauer S. (1997). Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton NJ: Princetown University Press.

  • Merleau-Ponty M. (1945/1964). Sense and Non-Sense. (H. L. Dreyfus and P. Allen Dreyfus Trans.). Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.

  • Pulvermüller F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience6(7) 576–582.

  • Rizzolatti G. Fogassi L. & Gallese V. (2000). Cortical mechanisms subserving object grasping and action recognition: A new view on the cortical motor functions. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.). The New Cognitive Neurosciences 2nd Edition (539–552). Cambridge: A Bradford Book MIT Press Ma.

  • Rizzolatti G. Fadiga L. Gallese V. & Fogassi L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research3 131–141.

  • Sbriscia-Fioretti B. Berchio C. Freedberg D. Gallese V. & Umiltà M. A. (2013). ERP modulation during observation of abstract paintings by Franz Kline. PloS ONE 8(10) e75241.

  • Simondon G. (2001). Du Mode d’Existence des Objets Techniques. Paris: Aubier.

  • Umiltà M. A. Berchio C. Sestito M. Freedberg D. & Gallese V. (2012). Abstract art and cortical motor activation: An EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6 311.

  • Wojciehowski H.C. & Gallese V. (2011). How stories make us feel. Toward an embodied narratology. California Italian Studies Vol. 2 Issue 1.

  • Wojciehowski H. C. & Gallese V. (2018). “Introduction.” Costellazioni: Rivista di lingue e letterature 5 9–22.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 248 248 62
PDF Downloads 264 264 67