From Cubes to Ribbons: Transformation of an Illusion

Open access

Summary

In Part 1 Small describes her discovery that an array of depicted cubes produces another and completely different illusion from that of a single cube. When a group of such cubes are viewed at an angle, they turn into rectangular boxes, and as the angle gets more severe, they become narrow ribbons. The illusion works only in one direction. In Part 2, Todorović manipulates the image to demonstrate various transformations and offers an explanation of how and why they work the way they do.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Balmelle C. Blanchard-Lemée M. Christophe J. Darmon J.-P. Guimier-Sorbets A.-M. Lavagne H. Prudhomme R. & Stern H. (2002). Le décor géométrique de la mosaïque romaine (2 Vols). Paris France: Picard.

  • Burton H. E. (Trans.). (1945). The optics of Euclid. Journal of the Optical Society of America 35 357–372.

  • Dobias J. J. & Papathomas T. V. (2014). The role of linear perspective cues on the perceived depth magnitude of the surfaces they are painted on: proper- reverse- and flat-perspective paintings. Perception 43 989–1000.

  • Guimier-Sorbets A.-M. (1994). Mosaïques et dallages dans le monde grec aux époques classique et hellénistique. In P. Johnson R. Ling & D. J. Smith (Eds.) Fifth International Colloquium on Ancient Mosaics. Bath England 5–12 1987. Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplement 9.1 (pp. 13–25). Portsmouth RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.

  • Hill H. C. & Johnston A. (2007). The hollow-face illusion: Object specific knowledge general assumptions or properties of the stimulus. Perception 36(2) 199–223.

  • Mazzoleni D. & Pappalardo U. (2004). Domus. Wall painting in the Roman house. Los Angeles CA: Getty Publications.

  • Minto A. (1941). Di un motivo decorativo ad opus scutulatum dipinto in una urnetta fittle chiusina. Studi Etruschi 15 385–389.

  • Moorman E. M. & Swinkels L. J. F. (1983). Lozenges in perspective. In A. Barbet (Ed.) La peinture murale romaine dans les provinces de l’Empire: [actes des] journées d’étude de Paris 23–25 septembre 1982. British Archaeological Reports – International Series 165 (pp. 239–262). Oxford UK: Archaeopress.

  • Pairault F.-H. (1972). Recherches sur quelques séries d’urnes de Volterra à représentations mythologiques. Collection de l’École Française de Rome (Vol. 12). Paris France: Editions de Boccard.

  • Paris R. & Di Sarcina M. T. (2012). Museo Nazionale Romano – Palazzo Massimo alle Terme – I mosaici. Milan Italy: Mondadori Electa S.p.A.

  • Price J. R. (1968). Studies of reversible perspective: a methodological review. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 1(3) 102–106.

  • Todorović D. (2009). The effect of the observer vantage point on perceived distortions in linear perspective images. Attention Perception & Psychophysics 71 183–193.

  • Topper D. (2000). On anamorphosis: Setting some things straight. Leonardo 33(2) 115–124.

  • Wade N. J. (2004). Good figures. Perception 33(2) 127–134.

  • Wade N. J. Campbell R. N. Ross H. E. & Lingelbach B. (2010). Necker in scotch perspective. Perception 39 1–4.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 330 234 12
PDF Downloads 156 111 6