Measures of Prägnanz?

Open access

Summary

Prägnanz was suggested by Max Wertheimer in the 1920s as subsuming all “Laws of Gestalt” as they apply to visual awareness. Thus, it assumes a prominent position in any account of Gestalt phenomena. From a phenomenological perspective, some visual stimuli evidently “have more Prägnanz” than others, so Prägnanz seems to be an intensive quality. Here, we investigate the intricacies that need to be faced on the way to a definition of formal scales. Such measures naturally depend both upon the stimulus and upon the observer. Structural complexity bottlenecks of visual systems play a role, as well as the relevance to biological fitness, that is the affinity to the optical user interface. This positions the notion of Prägnanz squarely within the realm of biology. Indeed, the familiar “releasers” of ethology are singular cases of extremely high Prägnanz.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Attneave F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 61(3) 183–193.

  • Birkhoff G. D. (1933). Aesthetic measure. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Bod R. (2002). A unified model of structural organization in language and music. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 17 289–308.

  • Boltzmann L. (1905). Populäre Schriften. Leipzig: Barth.

  • Borel É (1913). Mécanique Statistique et Irréversibilité. Journal of Physics5e(série 3) 189–196.

  • Borges J. L. (2000). [orig. 1941]: The total library: Non-fiction 1922–1986. Transl. Weinberger. E. London: The Penguin Press pp. 214–216.

  • Brown J. W. (2000). Mind and nature: Essays on time and subjectivity. London: Whurr Publishers.

  • Brunswik E. & Kamiya J. (1953). Ecological cue-validity of “proximity” and other Gestalt factors. The American Journal of Psychology 66 20–32.

  • Checkosky S. F. & Whitlock D. (1973). Effects of pattern goodness on recognition time in a memory search task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 100(2) 341–348.

  • Chipman S. F. (1977). Complexity and structure of visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 166(3) 269–301.

  • Desolneux A. Moisan L. & Morel J.-M. (2008). From gestalt theory to image analysis: A probabilistic approach. New York: Springer.

  • Dirlam D. K. (1972). Most efficient chunk sizes. Cognitive Psychology 3 355–359.

  • Farah M. (2004). Visual agnosia (2nd ed.). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Feynman R. (1967). The character of physical law. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

  • Gewirtz P. (1996). On ‘I Know It When I See It’. Yale Law Journal 105 1023–1047.

  • Gibson J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Gwynne D. T. & Rentz D. C. F. (1983). Beetles on the bottle: Male Buprestids mistake stubbies for females (Coleoptera). Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 22(1) 79–80.

  • Hess R. F. (1982). Developmental sensory impairment: Amblyopia or tarachopia? Human Neurobiology 1(1) 17–29.

  • Hoffman D. (2009). The interface theory of perception: Natural selection drives true perception to swift extinction. In S. Dickinson M. Tarr A. Leonardis & B. Schiele (Eds.) Object categorization: Computer and human vision perspectives (pp. 148–165). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hubel D. H. & Wiesel T. N. (1959). Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology 148(3) 574–591.

  • Julesz B. (1981). Textons the elements of texture perception and their interactions. Nature 290(5802) 91–97.

  • Knill D. C. & Richards W. A. (1996). Perception as Bayesian inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Koenderink J. J. (2014). The all seeing eye? Perception 43 1–6.

  • Koenderink J.J. (2011): Vision as a user interface. SPIE Proceedings Vol. 7865: Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XVI B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas (Eds.) 786504 1–13.

  • Köhler W. (1920). Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand. Eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung. Braunschweig: Fr. Vieweg & Sohn.

  • Kolmogorov A. N. (1965). Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Problems of Information Transmission 1 1–7.

  • Lakoff G. (1987). Women fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Leeuwenberg E. & van der Helm P. A. (2013). Structural Information Theory: The Simplicity of Visual Form. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Lewis D. (1972). Psychophysical and theoretical identifications. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50(3) 249–258.

  • Lorenz K. (1970). Studies in animal and human behaviour Volume 1 translated by Robert Martin. London: Methuen.

  • Lorenz K. (1973). Die Rückseite des Spiegels. Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens. München: Piper.

  • Markovic S. & Gvozdenovic V. (2001). Symmetry complexity and perceptual economy: effects of minimum and maximum simplicity conditions. Visual Cognition 8(3/4/5) 305–327.

  • Metzger W. (1936). Gesetze des Sehens. Erstauflage 1936; 2. erweiterte Auflage Verlag. Frankfurt: Waldemar Kramer.

  • Michell J. (1999). Measurement in Psychology – A critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Miller G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 101(2) 343–352.

  • Munk H. (1890). Erste Mittheilung (23. März 1877): Erfahrungen zu gunsten der Localisation. Über die Functionen der Grosshirnrinde. Gesammelte Mittheilungen Berlin: August Hirschwald.

  • Riedl R. (1984). Biology of knowledge: The evolutionary basis of reason. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Rosch E. (1983). Prototype classification and logical classification: The two systems. In E. K. Scholnick (Ed.) New trends in conceptual representation: Challenges to piaget’s theory? (pp. 73–86). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Schrödinger E. (1948). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. (Based on lectures delivered under the auspices of the Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies at Trinity College Dublin in February 1943). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Searle J. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Shannon C. E. & Weaver W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.

  • Tinbergen N. (1951). The study of instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Vollmer G. (1975). Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: Hirzel.

  • von Goethe J. W. (1790). Versuch die Metamorphose der Pflanzen zu erklären. Gotha: C.W. Ettinger.

  • von Uexküll J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: J. Springer.

  • von Uexküll J. (1920). Theoretische Biologie. Berlin: Verlag von Gebrüder Paetel.

  • von Uexküll J. (1934). Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen: Ein Bilderbuch unsichtbarer Welten (mit Kriszat G.). (Sammlung: Verständliche Wissenschaft Bd. 21.). Berlin: J. Springer.

  • Webber A. L. & Wood J. (2005). Amblyopia: Prevalence natural history functional effects and treatment. Clinical and Experimental Optometry 88(6) 365–375.

  • Wertheimer M. (1922/23). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt I: Prinzipielle Bemerkungen. Psychologische Forschung 1 47–58; (1923) Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psychologische Forschung 4 301–350.

  • Zurek W. H. (1989). Algorithmic randomness and physical entropy. Physical Review A 40(8) 4731–4751.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 555 315 8
PDF Downloads 217 162 2