Soziale Interaktion durch Synchronisation. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven / Social Interaction through Synchronisation. Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Open access


This paper combines perspectives from different disciplines to open up an interdisciplinary view on basic processes of human interaction. Part I addresses problematic assumptions of dominating theories of mind and limits of phenomenological description. Part II presents findings from social psychological and neuroscientific experiments on sensomotor synchronization. These experiments were carried out at levels of experiencing, behavior/kinematics, organic functions, and neurophysiology. Novel approaches that study intercerebral processes in musicians who interact face-to-face are particularly relevant: parts of non-identical brains function like temporarily coupled units. Part III discusses methodological issues and presuppositions of these experimental approaches as well as of current theories of mind. The findings from social psychology and neuroscience can serve to explicate phenomenological concepts and to complement descriptions, in particular of prereflective intentionality. Vice versa, the phenomenological view helps to critically examine limits and assumptions of empirical approaches and philosophical theories of mind. The presented findings on sensomotor and intercerebral synchronization corroborate phenomenological views of direct intercorporeal intersubjectivity, which provide an alternative to accounts that rely on simulation, representation, and inferential processes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adams F. & Aizawa K. (2009). Why the mind is still in the head. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (S. 78-95). Cambridge: CUP.

  • Auhagen W. (2009). Rhythmus und Timing. In H. Bruhn R. Kopiez & A. C. Lehmann (Hrsg.). Musikpsychologie: Das neue Handbuch 2. Aufl. (S. 437-457). Reinbek b. Hamburg: Rowohlt.

  • Berkowitz A.L. (2010). The Improvising Mind. Cognition and Creativity in The Musical Moment. Oxford New York: OUP.

  • Butterfield M.W. (2006). The Power of Anacrusis: Engendered Feeling in Groove-Based Musics. Music Theory Online 12 (4).

  • D’Ausilio A. Badino L. Li Y. Tokay S. Craighero L. Canto R. Aloimonos Y. & Fadiga L. (2012). Leadership in Orchestra Emerges from the Causal Relationships of Movement Kinematics. PLoS ONE 7 (5). doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Decety J. & Ickes W. (Hrsg.) (2009). The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. Cambridge London: MIT Press.

  • De Jaegher H & Di Paolo E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (4) 485-507.

  • FischingerT. & Kopiez R. (2009). Wirkungsphänomene des Rhythmus. In H. Bruhn R. Kopiez & A. C. Lehmann (Hrsg.). Musikpsychologie: Das neue Handbuch 2. Aufl. (458-475). Reinbek b. Hamburg: Rowohlt.

  • Froese T. & Fuchs Th. (2012). The extended body: a case study in the neurophenomenology of social interaction. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (2) 205-235.

  • Fuchs Th. (2010). Das Gehirn - ein Beziehungsorgan. Eine phänomenologisch-ökologische Konzeption. 3. aktual. u. erw. Aufl. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

  • Fuchs Th. & De Jaegher H. (2009). Enactive intersubjectivity: Participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4) 465-486.

  • Gallagher S. (2005). Two problems of intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 289-308.

  • Gallagher S. (2012). Phenomenology. Houndsmill New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Gratier M. & Apter-Danon G. (2009). The improvised musicality of belonging: Repetition and variation in mother-infant vocal interaction. In S. Malloch & C. Trevarthen (eds.). Communicative Musicality: Exploring the Basis of Human Companionship (301-327). Oxford: OUP.

  • Hari R. & Kujala M. (2009). Brain Basis of Human Social Interaction: From Concepts to Brain Imaging. Physiological Reviews 89 (April) 453-479.

  • Hasson U. Ghazanfar A.A. Galantucci B. Garrod S. & Keysers Ch. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (2) 114-121.

  • Hove M.J. & Risen J.L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: interpersonal synchrony increases affilitation. Social Cognition 27 (6) 949-961.

  • Husserl E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil: 1921-1928. Hrsg. Iso Kern. (Husserliana; XIV) Den Haag: Nijhoff.

  • Ickes W. (2003). Everyday Mind Reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

  • Konvalinka I. & Roepstorff A. (2012). The two-brain approach: How can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Vol. 6 Article 215. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Krueger J. (2013). Empathy enaction and shared musical experience: evidence from infant cognition. In T. Cochrane B. Fantini & K.R. Scherer (eds.). The Emotional Power of Music: Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Musical Arousal Expression and Social Control (177-196). Oxford: OUP.

  • Lakens D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46 (5) 701-708.

  • Lindenberger U. Li S.-C. Gruber W. & Müller V. (2009). Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar. BMC Neuroscience 10:22. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Malloch S. & Trevarthen C. (eds.). (2009). Communicative Musicality: Exploring the Basis of Human Companionship. Oxford: OUP.

  • Merleau-Ponty M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.

  • Miles L.K. Nind L.K. & Macrae C.N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (3) 585-589.

  • Monson I. (1996). Saying Something: Jazz Improvisation and Interaction. Chicago London: University of Chicago Press.

  • Müller V. & Lindenberger U. (2011). Cardiac and Respiratory Patterns Synchronize between Persons during Choir Singing. PLoS ONE 6 (9). doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sacks O. (2007). Musicophilia: Tales of Music and The Brain. New York Toronto: Knopf.

  • Sänger J. Lindenberger U. & Müller V. (2011). Interactive brains social minds. Communicative & Integrative Biology 4 (6) 655-663.

  • Sänger J. Müller V. & Lindenberger U. (2012). Intra- and interbrain synchronization and network properties when playing guitar in duets. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Vol. 6 Article 321. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Sänger J. Müller V. & Lindenberger U. (2013). Directionality in hyperbrain networks discriminates between leaders and followers in guitar duets. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Vol. 7 Article 234. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Scheler M. (1948). Wesen und Formen der Sympathie. Frankfurt/M: Schulte-Bulmke. [EA: Phänomenologie und Theorie der Sympathiegefühle 1913].

  • Schmicking D. (2013). Zur Phänomenologie interpersonellen Handelns und Bewusstseins. Eine exemplarische Analyse der Improvisation im Jazz. In D. Lohmar & D. Fonfara (Hrsg.). Phänomenologische Forschungen (Jg. 2013): Soziale Erfahrung (S. 267-283). Hamburg: Meiner.

  • Schütz [Schutz] A. (1964). Making Music Together: A Study in Social Relationship. In Collected Papers. Vol. II. Studies in Social Theory (ed. A. Brodersen) (159-178). Den Haag: Nijhoff.

  • Sebanz N. Bekkering H. & Knoblich G. (2006). Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (2) 70-76.

  • Singer W. (2007). Binding by synchrony. Scholarpedia 2 (12):1657.

  • Trost W. & Vuilleumier P. (2013). Rhythmic entrainment as a mechanism for emotion induction by music: a neurophysiological perspective. In T. Cochrane B. Fantini & K.R. Scherer (eds.). The Emotional Power of Music: Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Musical Arousal Expression and Social Control (213-225). Oxford: OUP.

  • Wilson R.A. & Clarke A. (2009). How to Situate Cognition. Letting Nature Take Its Course. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition (55-77). Cambridge: CUP.

  • Wing A.M. & Woodburn C. (1995). The coordination and consistency of rowers in a racing eight. Journal of Sport Sciences 13 187-197.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 241 120 3
PDF Downloads 124 84 1