Intercultural education and social contentment

Open access


With the incremented mass movement the society is in a significant transformation, this fact can be a risk for social unrest. Demographic evolution and change of the society stress the challenges for the institutions. The school represent one of the institutions where future citizens are educated and formed. The classroom is a mirror of the society in change. Today the school is a place of meeting of different cultures; we have more and more multicultural classes with pupils from different countries. The proposed work will analyse how intercultural education can influence the risk of social unrest and improve social contentment. In particular, will be stressed the concept of how the education of intercultural competences can allow the future adults to participate in a constructive and effective way to social and professional life.

Method: empirical analysis of literature and research done in the field of intercultural education analysis of the current situation through the ecological model of Brofenbrenner with a specific focus on micro and mesosystem and correlation between all ecosystems.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abou S. 1981. L’indentité culturelle Paris: Anthropos Paris p.70

  • Allport G. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley Reading MA.

  • Basarab (Cocoş) E. (2015). Education Cultural and Intercultural RelationProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180 pp 36 – 41

  • Bennett J. M. (2009). Transformative training: Designing programs for culture learning. In M. A. Moodian (Ed.) Contemporary leadership and intercultural competence (pp. 95–110). Thousand Oaks CA USA: Sage Publications.

  • Bennett M. (1998). Basic concepts in intercultural communication. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press

  • Bennett M. J. (2009). Defining measuring and facilitating intercultural learning: A conceptual introduction to the Intercultural Education. Intercultural Education Supplement 1 20 1–13.

  • Berry J.W. 1992. La reserche interculturelle Paris: L’Harmattan vol. 1 p. 18

  • Bhawuk D. P. S. (1998). The role of culture theory in cross-cultural training: A multi method study of culture-specific culture-general and culture theory based assimilators. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 29(5) 630–655.

  • Clanet C. 1993. L’interculturel: introduction aux approches interculturelles Paris: Presses Universitaires du Mirail Toulouse p.141.

  • Competences Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180 2015 pp 537 – 542

  • Dănescu E (2015). Intercultural Education from the Perspective of Training Didactic

  • Dubet F. 1996. Théories de la socialisation et définitions sociologiques de l’école în Revue française de sociologie p. 511-513.

  • Dubet F. 1996. Théories de la socialisation et définitions sociologiques de l’école în Revue française de sociologie p. 511-513.

  • McLaren L.M. 2003. Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe. Soc. Forces 81 909–936.

  • UNESCO. (1984). Repertoire des institutions d’etude interculturelle.Paris : UNESCO.

  • United Nations (2017). International Migration Report 2017 New York



Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 142 142 11
PDF Downloads 122 122 9