The carbon dioxide gasification process of Miscanthus giganteus biomass was examined using two methods. First an isothermal thermovolumetric method was applied. The measurement was conducted at 950°C and pressure of 0.1 MPa. Based on the continuous analysis of different kinds of gases formed during the gasification process, the thermovolumetric method allowed the determination of yields and composition of the resulting gas as well as the rate constant of CO formation. Then a non-isothermal thermogravimetric method was applied, during which the loss of weight of a sample as a function of temperature was recorded. In the course of the measurement, the temperature was raised from ambient to 950°C and the pressure was 0.1 MPa. As a result, a change in the carbon conversion degree was obtained. Moreover, TGA methods allow distinguishing various stages of the gasification process such as primary pyrolysis, secondary pyrolysis and gasification, and determining kinetic parameters for each stage. The presented methods differs from each other as they are based either on the analysis of changes in the resulting product or on the analysis of changes in the supplied feedstock, but both can be successfully used to the effective examination of kinetics of the gasification process. In addition, an important advantage of both methods is the possibility to carry out the gasification process for different solid fuels as coal, biomass, or solid waste in the atmosphere of a variety of gasification agents.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
 ALONSO M. J. G. BORREGO A. G. ALVAREZ D. PARRA J. B. MENENDEZ R. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on char optical texture and reactivity. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2001 58-59 887-909.
 ANTAL J.M. Biomass pyrolysis: a review of the literature. Part I-Carbohydrate pyrolysis. In: Advances in Solar Energy. New York: Springer 1983 61-111. ISBN 978-1-4684-8994-1.
 BALU E. LEE U. CHUNG J. N. High temperature steam gasification of woody biomass - A combined experimental and mathematical modeling approach. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015 40(41) 14104-14115.
 CETIN E. MOGHTADERI B. GUPTA R. WALL T. F. Biomass gasification kinetics: Influences of pressure and char structure. Combustion Science and Technology. 2005 177(4) 765-791.
 CZERSKI G. DZIOK T. STRUGALA A. PORADA S. Suitability of coal gasification technologies for the chemical industry. Przemysł Chemiczny. 2014 93(8) 1393-1400.
 HAMAD M. A. RADWAN A. M. HEGGO D. A. MOUSTAFA T. Hydrogen rich gas production from catalytic gasification of biomass. Renewable Energy. 2016 85 1290-1300.
 HU M. GUO D. MA C. HU Z. ZHANG B. XIAO B. LUO S. WANG J. Hydrogen-rich gas production by the gasification of wet MSW (municipal solid waste) coupled with carbon dioxide capture. Energy. 2015 90 857-863.
 JAYARAMAN K. GOKALP I. 2015. Effect of char generation method on steam CO2 and blended mixture gasification of high ash Turkish coals. Fuel 2015 153 320-327.
 KOMOROWICZ M. WRÓBLEWSKA H. PAWLOWSKI J. Chemical composition and energetic of biomass from selected renewable resources. Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów naturalnych. 2009 40 402-410.
 LI C. ZHAO J. FANG Y. WANG Y. Effect of pressure on gasification reactivity of three Chinese coals with different ranks. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China. 2010 4(4) 385-393.
 MIKULANDRIĆ R. LONČAR D. BÖHNING D. BÖHME R. BECKMANN M. Process performance improvement in a co-current fixed bed biomass gasification facility by control system modifications. Energy Conversion and Management. 1989 104 135-146.
 MIURA K. HASHIMOTO K. SILVESTON P. L. Factors affecting the reactivity of coal chars during gasification and indices representing reactivity. Fuel. 1989 68(11) 1461-1475.
 PORADA S. CZERSKI G. DZIOK T. GRZYWACZ P. MAKOWSKA D. Comparison of steam gasification kinetics of coal and its char. Przemysł Chemiczny. 2014 93(12) 2059-2063.
 PORADA S. ROZWADOWSKI A. Kinetic study of steam gasification of bituminous coal at elevated pressures. Przemysł Chemiczny. 2014 93(3) 384-387.
 SAKAWA M. SAKURAI Y. HARA Y. Influence of coal characteristic on CO2 gasification. Fuel. 1982 61(8) 717-720.
 SENNECA O. 2007. Kinetics of pyrolysis combustion and gasification of three biomass fuels. Fuel Processing Technology. 2007 88(1) 87-97.
 SEO D. K. PARK S. S. HWANG J. YU T. U. Study of the pyrolysis of biomass using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and concentration measurements of the evolved species. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2010 89(1) 66-73.
 TINGTING L. LEI Z. Effects of gasification atmosphere and temperature on char structural evolution during the gasification of Collie sub-bituminous coal. Fuel 2014 117 1190-1995.
 WEBER R. Extracting mathematically exact kinetic parameters from experimental data on combustion and pyrolysis of solid fuels Journal of the Energy Institute 2008 81 226-233.
 XU X. Q. WANG Y. G. CHEN Z. D. CHEN X. J. ZHANG H. Y. BAI L. ZHANG S. Variations in char structure and reactivity due to the pyrolysis and in-situ gasification using Shengli brown coal. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 2015 115 233-241.
 XU Y. ZANG G. CHEN H. DOU B. TAN C. Co-production systems of hydrogen and electricity 18 based on coal partial gasification with CO2 capture. International Journal of Hydrogen 19 Energy 2012 37 11805-11814.
 YANG L. LIANG J. YU L. Clean coal technology - Study on the pilot project experiment of underground coal gasification. Energy. 2003 28(14) 1445-1460.
 YE D. P. AGNEW J. B. ZHANG D. K. Gasification of a South Australian low-rank coal with carbon dioxide and steam: kinetics and reactivity studies. Fuel. 1998 77(11) 1209-1219.
 YOO Y.D. LEE S.J. YUN Y. Synthesis of dimethyl ether from syngas obtained by coal gasification. Koeran J. Chem. Eng 2007 24 350-353.
 ŻOGOŁA A. Equilibrium Simulations of Coal Gasification - Factors Affecting Syngas Composition. Journal of Sustainable Mining. 2014 13(2) 30-38.