Surface dating by luminescence: An overview

Open access

Abstract

Daylight radiation resets luminescence ‘clock’ to zero on rock surfaces, but transmission depends on the transparency of the rock. On burial, surfaces are no longer exposed to daylight and accumulation of trapped electrons takes place till the excavation. This reduction of luminescence as a function of depth fulfils the prerequisite criterion of daylight bleaching. Thus rock artefacts and monuments follow similar bleaching rationale as those for sediments. In limestone and marble, daylight can reach depths of 0.5–1 mm and up to 16 mm respectively, while for other igneous rocks e.g. quartz in granites, partial bleaching occurs up to 5mm depth under several hours of daylight exposures and almost complete beaching is achieved in the first 1 mm within about 1 min daylight exposure. The ‘quartz technique’ for limestone monuments containing traces of quartz enables their dating with Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) techniques. The surface luminescence (thermoluminescence, TL or OSL) dating has been developed and further refined on various aspects of equivalent dose determination, complex radiation geometry, incomplete bleaching etc. A historical review of the development including important applications, along with some methodological aspects are discussed.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Adamiec G and Aitken MJ 1998. Dose-rate convertion factors: update. Ancient TL 16: 37–50.

  • [2] Aitken MJ 1985. Thermoluminescence dating. Academic Press London: 359pp.

  • [3] Aitken MJ 1998. An introduction to optical dating. Oxford University Press Oxford: 280pp.

  • [4] Baillif I 2006. Development of single grain OSL dating of ceramic materials: spatially resolved measurement of absorbed dose. Radiation Measurements 41(7–8): 744–749 DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.04.012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2006.04.012

  • [5] Bailiff IK and Mikhailik VB 2003. Spatially-resolved measurements of optically stimulated luminescence and time-resolved luminescence. Radiation Measurements 37(2): 151–159 DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(02)00187-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(02)00187-7

  • [6] Berger GW and Huntley DJ 1989. Treatment of error in plateau values-caveat emptor. Ancient TL 7(2): 27–29.

  • [7] Duller GAT 1995. Luminescence dating using single aliquots: methods and applications. Radiation Measurements 24(3): 217–226 DOI 10.1016/1350-4487(95)00150-D. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1350-4487(95)00150-D

  • [8] Duller GAT Bøtter-Jensen L and Markey BG 1997. A luminescence imaging system based on a CCD camera. Radiation Measurements 27(2): 91–99 DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00120-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00120-5

  • [9] Duller GAT Bøtter-Jensen L and Murray AS 2000. Optical dating of single sand-sized grains of quartz: sources of variability. Radiation Measurements 32(5–6): 453–457 DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00055-X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00055-X

  • [10] Galloway RB 1993. Stimulation of luminescence using green light emitting diodes. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 47(1–4): 679–682.

  • [11] Galbraith RF Roberts RG Laslett GM Yoshida H and Olley JM 1999. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter northern Australia: Part I Experimental design and statistical models. Archaeometry 41(2): 339–364 DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1999.tb00987.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1999.tb00987.x

  • [12] Greilich S 2004. Über die Datierung von Gesteinsoberflächen mittels optisch stimulierter Lumineszenz. Ph.D Dissertation University of Heidelberg (in German).

  • [13] Greilich S and Wagner GA 2009. Light thrown on history — The dating of stone surfaces at the geoglyphs of Palpa using OSL In: M Reidel and GA Wagner eds. New Technologies for Archaeology Natural Sciences in Archaeology Chapter 16 Springer-Verlag Berlin: 271–283.

  • [14] Greilich S Glasmacher UA and Wagner GA 2002. Spatially resolved detection of luminescence: a unique tool for archaeochronometry. Naturwissenschaften 89: 371–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00114-002-0341-z

  • [15] Greilich S Glasmacher GA and Wagner GA 2005. Optical dating of granitic stone surfaces. Archaeometry 47(3): 645–665 DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2005.00224.x. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2005.00224.x

  • [16] Habermann J Schilles T Kalchgruber R and Wagner GA 2000. Steps towards surface dating using luminescence. Radiation Measurements 32(5–6): 847–851 DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00109-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00066-4

  • [17] Huntley DJ and Richards M 1997. The age of the Diring Quriakh archaeological site. Ancient TL 15(2–3): 48–51.

  • [18] Kitis G Liritzis I and Vafiadou A 2002. Deconvolution of optical stimulated luminescence decay curves. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 254(1): 143–149 DOI 10.1023/A:1020862102754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020862102754

  • [19] Kokkoris M and Liritzis I 1997. Dose versus time for U-disequilibrium and revised dose-rate data for TL/ESR dating. European Journal PACT 45(I2): 281–294.

  • [20] Lefkowitz M 2006.Archaeology and the politics of origins. In: Garrett G. Fagan ed. Archaeological Fantasies: How Pseudoarchaeology Misrepresents the Past and Misleads the Public. Routledge: 180–202.

  • [21] Liritzis Y 1986. The significance of gamma self-dose and beta-ranges in ceramics revisited. Revue d’Archeometrie 10: 95–102.

  • [22] Liritzis I. 1989. Dating of calcites: Some aspects of radiation survey in caves and dose-rates. Annales Geologiques Des Pays Helleniques 34(1): 123–136.

  • [23] Liritzis I and Kokkoris M 1992. Revised dose-rate data for thermoluminescence / ESR dating. Nuclear Geophysics 6(3): 423–443.

  • [24] Liritzis I 1994a. A new dating method by thermoluminescence of carved megalithic stone building. Comptes Rendus de l’ Academie des Sciences Paris 319 serie II 319: 603–610

  • [25] Liritzis I 1994b. Archaeometry: dating the past. EKISTICS 368/364: 361–366.

  • [26] Liritzis I 1995. Alternative determination of equivalent dose by green light emitting diodes optically stimulated luminescence using the unstable luminescence. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 190(1): 13–21 DOI 10.1007/BF02035632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02035632

  • [27] Liritzis I 2000. Advances in thermo- and opto-luminescence dating of environmental materials (sedimentary deposits): Part I: Techniques. The GLOBAL NEST: the International Journal 2(1): 3–27 and Part II: Applications The GLOBAL NEST: the International Journal 2(1): 29–49.

  • [28] Liritzis I 2001. Searching for precision of a new “luminescence clock” in calcitic rocks. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 247(3): 727–730 DOI 10.1023/A:1010696308875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010696308875

  • [29] Liritzis I 2010. Strofilas (Andros island Greece): new evidence for the Cycladic final Neolithic period through novel dating methods using luminescence and obsidian hydration. Journal of Archaeological Science 37(6): 1367–1377 DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.041

  • [30] Liritzis I and Galloway RB 1999. Dating implications from daylight bleaching of Thermoluminescence of ancient marble. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 241(2): 361–368 DOI 10.1007/BF02347476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02347476

  • [31] Liritzis I and Vafiadou A. 2005. Dating by luminescence of ancient megalithic masonry. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 5(1): 25–38.

  • [32] Liritzis I Galloway RB and Theocaris PS 1994. Thermoluminescence dating of ceramics revisited: optical stimulated luminescence of quartz single aliquot with green light emitting diodes. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Letters 188(3): 189–198 DOI 10.1007/BF02164592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02164592

  • [33] Liritzis I Guibert P Foti F and Schvoerer M 1996. Daylight bleaching of TL of calcites. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 117(3): 260–268 DOI 10.1016/0168-583X(96)00305-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(96)00305-9

  • [34] Liritzis I Galloway RB and Hong D 1997a. Single aliquot dating of ceramics by green light stimulation of luminescence from quartz. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 132(3): 457–467 DOI 10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00456-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(97)00456-4

  • [35] Liritzis I Guibert P Foti F and Schvoerer M 1997b. The Temple of Apollo (Delphi) strengthens novel thermoluminescence dating method. Geoarchaeology International 12: 479–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6548(199708)12:5<479::AID-GEA3>3.0.CO;2-X

  • [36] Liritzis I Katsonopoulou D Soter S and Galloway RB 2001. In search of ancient Helike gulf of Corinth Greece. Journal of Coastal Research 17(1): 118–123.

  • [37] Liritzis I Galloway RB Hong D and Kyparisi-Apostolika N 2002. OSL dating of three prehistoric ceramics from Theopetra Cave Greece: a case study. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 2(2): 35–43.

  • [38] Liritzis I Sideris C Vafiadou A and Mitsis J 2007. Mineralogical petrological and radioactivity aspects of some building material from Egyptian Old Kingdom monuments. Journal of Cultural Heritage 9(1): 1–13 DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2007.03.009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2007.03.009

  • [39] Liritzis I Kitis G Galloway RB Vafiadou A Tsirliganis N and Polymeris G 2008a. Probing luminescence dating of archaeologically significant carved rock types. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 8(1): 61–79.

  • [40] Liritzis I Sideris C Vafiadou A and Mitsis J 2008b. Mineralogical petrological and radioactivity aspects of building material from Egyptian Old Kingdom monuments. Journal of Cultural Heritage 9(1): 1–13 DOI 10.1016/j.culher.2007.03.009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2007.03.009

  • [41] Liritzis I Zacharias N and Polymeris G 2010a. Surface luminescence dating of ‘Dragon Houses’ and Armena Gate at Styra (Euboea Greece). Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry10(3) 65–81.

  • [42] Liritzis I Zacharias N Polymeris G Kitis G Ernston K Sudhaus D Neumaier A Mayer W Rappengluck MA and Rappengluck B 2010b. The Chiemgau meteorite impact and tsunami event (southeast Germany): First OSL dating. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 10(4): 17–33 (in press online www.rhodes.aegean.gr/maa_journal).

  • [43] Liritzis I Drivaliari A Polymeris G and Katagas C 2010c. New quartz technique for the OSL dating of limestone. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 10(1): 81–87.

  • [44] Martini M and Sebilia E 2001. Radiation in archaeometry: archaeological dating. Radiation Physics and Chemistry 61(3–6): 241–246 DOI 10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00247-X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00247-X

  • [45] Morgenstein ME Luo S Ku TL and Feathers J 2003. Uranium series and luminescence dating of volcanic lithic artefacts. Archaeometry 45(3): 503–518 DOI 10.1111/1475-4754.00124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-4754.00124

  • [46] Murari MK Achyuthan H and Singhvi AK 2007. Luminescence studies on the sediments laid down by the December 2004 tsunami event: Prospects for the dating of papaeo tsunamis and for the estimation of sediment flow. Current Science 92(3): 367–371.

  • [47] Murray AS and Roberts RG 1997. Determining the burial time of single grains of quartz using optically stimulated luminescence. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 152(1–4): 163–180 DOI 10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00150-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00150-7

  • [48] Murray AS and Wintle AG 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32(1): 57–73 DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X

  • [49] Murray AS Roberts RG and Wintle AG 1997. Equivalent dose measurements using a single aliquot of quartz. Radiation Measurements 27(2): 171–184 DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00130-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00130-8

  • [50] Richards P 1992. Luminescence dating of quartzite from Diring Yuriakh site. M.S.c thesis Simon Fraser University Canada.

  • [51] Singhvi AK Chauhan N and Biswas RH 2010. A survey of some new approaches in extending the maximum age limit and accuracy of luminescence application to archeological chronometry. Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry 10(4): 9–15.

  • [52] Theocaris P Liritzis I and Galloway RB 1997. Dating of two Hellenic pyramids by a novel application of thermoluminescence. Journal of Archaeological Science 24(5): 399–405 DOI 10.1006/jasc.1996.0124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1996.0124

  • [53] Vafiadou A Murray AS and Liritzis I 2007. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating investigations of rock and underlying soil from three case studies. Journal of Archaeological Science 34(10): 1659–1669 DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2006.12.004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2006.12.004

  • [54] Vaz JE 1983. The effect of insolation on the thermoluminescence response of an archaeological stone sculpture. PACT 9: 335–342.

  • [55] Wintle AG and Huntley DJ 1980. Thermoluminescence dating of ocean sediments. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 17(3): 348–360 DOI 10.1139/e80-034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/e80-034

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.865
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.623

CiteScore 2018: 1.12

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.584
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.514

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 562 230 12
PDF Downloads 159 84 8