The Difference in the Mucus Organization Between the Small and Large Intestine and Its Protection of Selected Natural Substances. A Review

Open access


The mucus layer of the intestinal tract plays an important role of forming the front line of innate host defense. Recent studies have suggested that the involvement of feeding natural additives on protection/prevention/promotion of mucus production in the intestinal environment is beneficial. The goblet cells continually produce mucins for the retention of the mucus barrier under physiological conditions, but different factors (e. g. microorganisms, microbial toxins, viruses, cytokines, and enzymes) can have profound effects on the integrity of the intestinal epithelium covered by a protective mucus. The intestinal mucus forms enterocytes covered by transmembrane mucins and goblet cells produce by the secreted gel-forming mucins (MUC2). The mucus is organized in a single unattached mucus layer in the small intestine and in two mucus layers (inner, outer) in the colon. The main part of the review evaluates the effects of natural additives/substances supplementation to stimulate increased expression of MUC2 mucin in the intestine of animals.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Abiodun O. O. Rodriguez-Nogales A. Algieri F. Gomez-Caravaca A. M. Segura-Carretero A. Utrilla M. P. et al. 2016: Antiinflamatory and immunomodulatory activity of an ethanolic extract from the stem bark of Terminalia catappa L. (Combretaceae): in vitro and in vivo evidences. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 192 309—319.

  • 2. Aliakbarpour H. R. Chamani M. Rahimi G. Sadeghi A. A. Qujeq D. 2012: The Bacillus subtilis and lactic acid bacteria probiotics influence intestinal mucin gene expression histomorphology and growth performance in broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 25 1285—1293.

  • 3. Bäckström M. Ambort D. Thomsson E. Johansson M. E. Hansson G. C. 2013: Increased understanding of the biochemistry and biosynthesis of MUC2 and other gel-forming mucins through the recombinant expression of their protein domains. Mol. Biotechnol. 54 250—256.

  • 4. Bermudez-Brito M. Plaza-Díaz J. Muñoz-Quezada S. Gómez-Llorente C. Gil A. 2012: Probiotic Mechanisms of Action. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 61 160—174.

  • 5. Blaschek H. P. Wang H. H. Agle M. E. 2007: Biofilms in the Food Environment 1st edn. IFT Press Blackwell Publishing Iowa USA 193 pp.

  • 6. Birchenough G. M. H. Johansson M. E. V. Gustafsson J. K. Bergström J. H. Hansson G. C. 2015: New developments in goblet cell mucus secretion and function. Mucosal Immunol. 8 712—719.

  • 7. Cani P. D. 2018: A brief overview of the mechanisms of action by which traditional and next-generation probiotics affect host health. Gut Microbiota Research and Practice

  • 8. Cornick S. Tawiah A. Chadee K. 2015: Roles and regulation of the mucus barrier in the gut. Tissue Barriers 3 e982426.

  • 9. Čapkovičová A. Maková Z. Piešová E. Faix Š. Alves A. Faixová Z. 2012: Evaluation of effects of Thymus vulgaris extract on metabolism and gut mucus in chicks. Folia Veterinaria 56 21—27.

  • 10. Čapkovičová A. Maková Z. Piešová E. Alves A. Faix Š. Faixová Z. 2014: Evaluation of the effects of Salvia officinalis essential oil on plasma biochemistry gut mucus and quantity of acidic and neutral mucins in the chicken gut. Acta Vet. Beograd 64 138—148.

  • 11. Demeterová M. Šamudovská A. Faixová Z. Maková Z. Piešová E. Bujňák L. 2012: Purified β–glucan from oyster mushrooms (pleurotus ostreatus l.) in the diets for chickens: performance mucus formation and fermentation in the caecum. Folia Veterinaria 56 45—46.

  • 12. Deplancke B. Gaskins H. R. 2001: Microbial modulation of innate defense: goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 73 1131S—1141S.

  • 13. Dohrman A. Miyata S. Gallup M. 1998: Mucin gene (MUC2 and MUC5AC upregulation by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1406 251—259.

  • 14. Donaldson G. P. Lee S. M. Mazmanian S. K. 2016: Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nature Reviews Microbiology 14 20—32.

  • 15.

  • 16. Ermund A. Schütte A. Johansson M. E. V. Gustafsson J. K. Hansson G. C. 2013: Studies of mucus in mouse stomach small intestine and colon. I. Gastrointestinal mucus layers have different properties depending on location as well as over the Peyer’s patches. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 305 G341—G347.

  • 17. Faixová Z. Piešová E. Maková Z. Levkut M. jr. Pistl J. Lauková A. et al. 2012: Effect of dietary probiotic and plant extract supplementation on mucin dynamics in the chicken intestine and on performance of chickens. Folia Veterinaria 56 (Supplementum II) 15—16.

  • 18. Hansson G. C. 2012: Role of mucus layers in gut infection and inflammation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15 57—62.

  • 19. Hashemi R. Davoodi H. 2011: Herbal plant and their derivatives as growth and health promoters in animal nutrition. Veterinary Research Communications 35 169—180.

  • 20. Chen Y. P. Cheng Y. F. Li X. H. Yang W. L. Wen C. Zhuang S. Zhou Y. M. 2017: Effects of threonine supplementation on the growth performance immunity oxidative status intestinal integrity and barrier function of broilers at the early age. Poultry Science 96 405—413.

  • 21. Cho Y. Yoon K. J. 2014: An overview of calf diarrhea — infectious etiology diagnosis and intervention. J. Vet. Sci. 15 1—17.

  • 22. Jakobsson H. E. Rodríguez-Piñeiro A. M. Schütte A. Ermund A. Boysen P. Bemark M. et al. 2015: The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier. EMBO reports 16 164—177.

  • 23. Johansson M. E. V. Ambort D. Pelaseyed T. Schutte A. Gustafsson J. K. Ermund A. et al. 2011a: Composition and functional role of the mucus layers in the intestine. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 68 3635—3641.

  • 24. Johansson M. E. V. Holmén-Larsson D. B. Hansson G. C. 2011b: The two mucus layers of colon are organized by the MUC2 mucin whereas the outer layer is a legislator of host-microbial interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108 4659—4665.

  • 25. Johansson M. E. V. Sjovall H. Hansson G. C. 2013: The gastrointestinal mucus system in health and disease. Natur. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10 352—361.

  • 26. Kim Y. S. Ho S. B. 2010: Intestinal Goblet cells and mucins in health and disease: Recent insights and progress. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 12 319—330.

  • 27. Li H. Limenitakis J. P. Fuhrer T. Geuking M. B. Lawson M. A. Wyss M. et al. 2015: The outer mucus layer hosts a distinct intestinal microbial niche. Nature Communications 6 8292.

  • 28. Licois D. Guillo J. F. Mouline C. Reynaud A. 1992: Susceptibility of the rabbit to an enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli 0103: effect of animals’ age. Ann. Rech. Vet. 23 225—232.

  • 29. Lin A. 2010: Characterization of Murine Intestinal Mucus Layer Gene Expression During Postnatal Maturation (Thesis) University of Toronto 101 pp.

  • 30. Loeffler S. L. 2014: Effects of Probiotic and Prebiotic Supplementation in Turkey Poults on Intestinal Morphology and MUC2 Gene Expression (Thesis) The Ohio State University 50 pp.

  • 31. Macfarlane S. Macfarlane G. T. 2006: Composition and metabolic activities of bacterial biofilms colonizing food residues in the human gut. App. Environ. Microbiol. 72 6204—6211.

  • 32. Mah T. F. C. O’Toole G. A. 2001: Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends in Microbiology 9 34—39.

  • 33. Major P. Revajová V. Levkut M. Ševčíková Z. Spišáková V. Faixová Z. et al. 2011: Intestinal mucin dynamic and leukocytic responses of chickens infected with Eimeria acervulina and fed oregano supplemented diet. Acta Vet. Brno 80 147—156.

  • 34. Maková Z. Piešová E. Faixová Z. Levkut M. jr Lauková A. Pistl J. 2009: The effect of S. enteritidis PT4 and E. faecium EF55 on chicken intestine mucus production and some haematological parameters. Folia Veterinaria 53 162—164.

  • 35. Mattar A. F. Teitelbaum D. H. Drongowski R. A. Yongyi F. Harmon C. M. Coran A. G. 2002: Probiotics up-regulate MUC-2 mucin gene expression in a Caco-2 cell-culture model. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 18 586—90.

  • 36. Mack D. R. Michail S. Wei S. McDougall L. 1999: Probiotics inhibit enteropathogenic E. coli adherence in vitro by including intestinal mucin gene expression. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 276 39—44.

  • 37. Moghaddam H. S. Moghaddam H. N. Kermanshahi H. Mosavi A. H. Raji A. 2011: The effect of threonine on mucin 2 gene expression intestinal histology and performance of broiler chicken. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 10 e14.

  • 38. Montagne L. Pluske J. R. Hampson D. J. 2003: A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa and their consequences on digestive health in young nonruminant animals. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 108 95—117.

  • 39. Oh N. S. Lee J. Y. Lee J. M. Lee K. W. Kim Y. 2017: Mulberry leaf extract fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus A4 ameliorates 5-fluorouracil-induced intestinal mucositis in rats. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 64 459—468.

  • 40. Sangani A. K. Masoudi A. A. Hosseini S. A. 2014: The effects of herbal plants on Mucin 2 gene expression and performance in ascetic broilers. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine 8 47—52.

  • 41. Smirnov A. Tako E. Ferket P. R. Uni Z. 2006: Mucin gene expression and mucin content in the chicken intestinal goblet cells are affected by in ovo feeding of carbohydrates. Poult. Sci. J. 85 669—673.

  • 42. Sørensen M. T. Vestergaard E. M. Jensen S. K. Lauridsen C. Højsgaard S. 2009: Performance and diarrhoea in piglets following weaning at seven weeks of age: Challenge with E. coli O 149 and effect of dietary factors. Livestock Science 123 314—321.

  • 43. Strompfová V. Lauková A. 2007: In vitro study on bacteriocin production of Enterococci associated with chickens. Anaerobe 13 228—237.

  • 44. Ševčíková Z. Blanár J. Lauková A. Revajová V. Strompfová V. Levkut M. 2016: Effect of Enterococcus faecium EF 55 on morphometry and proliferative activity of intestinal mucosa in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis. J. Vet. Res. 60 261—265.

  • 45. Van den Steen P. Rudd P. M. Dwek R. A. Opdenakker G. 1998: Concepts and Principles of O-Linked Glycosylation. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 33 151—208.

  • 46. Wang L. Cao H. Liu L. Wang B. Walker W. A. Acra S. A. Yan F. 2014: Activation of epidermal growth factor receptor mediates mucin production stimulated by p40 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-derived protein. J. Biol. Chem. 289 20234—20244.

  • 47. Wilson M. 2002: Bacterial adhesion to host tissues: mechanisms and consequences. Adv. Mol. Cell. Microb. 1 1—39.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 178 178 3
PDF Downloads 168 168 17