Vegetation recovery in fire-damaged forests: a case study at the southern boundary of the taiga zone

Open access


Wildfire is regarded as important environmental factor determining the vegetation of the Earth. We analyzed 11 plots at different types of forest affected by fire at the southern boundary of the taiga zone. These differ in structure of the forest stand and herb-shrub layer. Investigated factors included edaphic (moisture, pH, nitrogen) and climatic (light, temperature, continentality) characteristics. Also, projective cover of Epilobium angustifolium L. and undergrowth of secondary growth trees (including forest stand survived after fire influence) were studied. Multivariate data analysis revealed that the rate and character of the vegetation recovery was depended on the ratio of environmental factors and on the species composition of herb-shrub layer. No significant differences were found in Ellenberg’s indicator values between different years of study. All tested forest habitats were distinguished into three main groups: Group I includes broadleaf forests with the forest stand survived after fire influence, Group II includes spruce and birch forests deprived the forest stand due to fire impact, Group III includes more or less dry pine-dominated forests with the forest stand gradually died after fire influence. Two marshy plots have prerequisites to their allocation to a separate group close to the oligotrophic bog forests.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aleksandrova V.D. 1964. The study of changes of vegetation cover. – Lavrenko E.M. Korchagina A.A. (eds.). Field geobotany. Moscow Leningrad Nauka 399–447. (In Russian).

  • Bayanov N.G. 2015. Climate changes of the northwest of Mordovia during the period of existence of the Mordovia Reserve according to the meteorological observations in Temnikov. – Proceedings of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve 14 212–219. (In Russian).

  • BC Wildfire Service. 2015. Fire Rank. [WWW document]. – URL [Accessed 3 April 2016].

  • Böhling N. Greuter W. Raus T. 2002. Indicator values for vascular plants in the Southern Aegean (Greece). – Braun-Blanquetia 32 1–109.

  • Bond W.J. Wilgen B.W. (eds.). 1996. Fire and Plants. London Chapman & Hall. 263 pp.

  • Diekmann M. 2003. Species indicator values as an important tool in applied plant ecology: a review. – Basic and Applied Ecology 4 493–506.

  • Ellenberg H. Weber H.E. Düll R. Wirth V. Werner W. 2001. Pointer values of plants in Central Europe. 3 edition. (Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. 3. Auflage). – Scripta Geobotanica 18 1–261. (In German).

  • Godefroid S. Dana E.D. 2007. Can Ellenberg’s indicator values for Mediterranean plants be used outside their region of definition? – Journal of Biogeography 34 62–68.

  • Gromtsev A. (ed.). 2000. Landscape ecology of boreal forests: theoretical and applied aspects. Petrozavodsk Karelskiy Nauchny Tsentr RAN. (In Russian).

  • Hammer Ø. Harper D.A.T. Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. – Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1) 9.

  • Hill M.O. Mountford J.O. Roy D.B. Bunce R.G.H. (eds.). 1999. Ellenberg’s indicator values for British plants. ECOFACT Vol. 2: Technical Annex. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Abbots Ripton. 46 pp.

  • Hytteborn H. Maslov A.A. Nazimova D.I. Rysin L.P. 2005. Boreal forests of Eurasia. – Andersson F.A. (ed.). Coniferous forests. Amsterdam Elsevier 23–100.

  • Karami A. Sefidi K. Feghhi J. Mohadjer M.R.M. 2012. Spatial distribution of regeneration patches in old growth oriental beech forests in northern Iran. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused 57 5–15.

  • Khapugin A.A. Vargot E.V. Chugunov G.G. Shugaev N.I. 2012. About changes in the vegetation cover of forests of different types after wildfires in the Mordovia State Nature Reserve. – Proceedings of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve 10 309–315. (In Russian).

  • Kovaleva N.M. 2014. Postfire recovery of the ground cover in pine forests of the Lower Angara Region. – Contemporary Problems of Ecology 7(3) 338–344.

  • Kuznetsov N.I. 2014. The conditions of existence and main features of the vegetation cover structure on the territory of Mordovia State Reserve. 1939 year. – Proceedings of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve 12 79–195. (In Russian).

  • Lavorel S. Flannigan M.D. Lambin E.F. Scholes M.C. 2007. Vulnerability of land systems to fire: Interactions among humans climate the atmosphere and ecosystems. – Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12(1) 33–53.

  • Lentile L.B. Morgan P. Hudak A.T. Bobbitt M.J. Lewis S.A. Smith A.M.S. Robichaud P.R. 2007. Post-fire burn severity and vegetation response following eight large wildfires across the western United States. – Fire Ecology 3(1) 91–108.

  • Morneau C. Payette S. 1989. Postfire lichen–spruce woodland recovery at the limit of the boreal forest in northern Quebec. – Canadian Journal of Botany 67(9) 2770–2782.

  • Nowak S. Kershaw G.P. Kershaw L.J. 2002. Plant diversity and cover after wildfire on anthropogenically disturbed and undisturbed sites in subarctic upland Picea mariana forest. – Arctic 55 269–280.

  • Pignatti S. Menegoni P. Pietrosanti S. 2005. Bioindication through the vascular plants. Indicator values according to Ellenberg (Zeigerwerte) for the species of the flora of Italy. (Biondicazione attraverso le piante vascolari. Valori di indicazione secondo Ellenberg (Zeigerwerte) per le specie della Flora d’Italia). – Braun-Blanquetia 39 1–97. (In Italian).

  • Ruokolainen L. Salo K. 2006. The succession of boreal forest vegetation during ten years after slash-burning in Koli National Park eastern Finland. – Annales Botanici Fennici 43 363–378.

  • Ryan K.C. 2002. Dynamic interactions between forest structure and fire behavior in boreal ecosystems. – Silva Fennica 36 13–39.

  • Seregin A.P. 2014. Further east: eutrophication as a major threat to the flora of Vladimir Oblast Russia. – Environmental Science and Pollution Research 21 12883–12897.

  • Steffen W. Persson Å. Deutsch L. Zalasiewicz J. Williams M. Richardson K. Crumley C. Crutzen P. Folke C. Gordon L. Molina M. Ramanathan V. Rockström J. Scheffer M. Schellnhuber H.J. Svedin U. 2011. The anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. – Ambio 40 739–761.

  • Summers W.T. Coloff S.G. Conard S.G. 2011. Fire Histroy and Climate Change Joint Fire Science Program Project 09-2-01-09 190 p.

  • ter Braak C.J.F. Gremmen N.J.M. 1987. Ecological amplitudes of plant species and the internal consistency of Ellenberg’s indicator values for moisture. – Vegetatio 69 79–87.

  • Tereshkin I.S. Tereshkina L.V. 2006. Vegetation of the Mordovia Reserve. Successive series of the successions. – Proceedings of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve 7 186–287. (In Russian).

  • Tinner W. Conedera M. Gobet E. Hubschmid P. Wehrli M. Ammann B. 2000. A palaeoecological attempt to classify fire sensitivity of trees in the southern Alps. – The Holocene 10(5) 565–574.

  • Turner M.G. Hargrove W.W. Gardner R.H. Romme W.H. 1994. Effects of fire on landscape heterogeneity in Yellowstone National Park Wyoming. – Journal of Vegetation Science 5 731–742.

  • Ulanova N.G. 2000. The effects of windthrow on forests at different spatial scales: a review. – Forest Ecology and Management 135(1–3) 155–167.

  • Vacchiano G. Lonati M. Berretti R. Motta R. 2015. Drivers of Pinus sylvestris L. regeneration following small high-severity fire in a dry inner-alpine valley. – Plant Biosystems 149(2) 354–363.

  • Viewegh J. Kusbach A. Mikeska M. 2003. Czech forest ecosystem classification. – Journal of Forest Science 49 85–93.

  • Walter H. Breckle S.-W. (eds.). 1999. Vegetation and climatic zones. 7 edition. (Vegetation und Klimazonen. 7. Auflage). Ulmer Verlag Stuttgart. 544 pp. (In German).

  • Zelený D. Schaffers A.P. 2012. Too good to be true: pitfalls of using mean Ellenberg indicator values in vegetation analyses. – Journal of Vegetation Science 23 419–431.

  • Zhang X. Liu Z. Bing Y. Zhu B. Trung L.N. Chen K. 2014. Dissimilation of soil humus in forest with pure stands and its relationship with other bio-chemical properties in the semiarid windy region of the Loess Plateau China. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused 60 24–33.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 1.24

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.331
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.743

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 345 173 6
PDF Downloads 162 85 5