Biomass allocation in seedlings and saplings at different stages of growth is important information for studying the response of species to site conditions. The objectives of the paper are: (a) to analyse the relationship between height and biomass in young Norway spruce and European beech trees, (b) to study the influence of the leaf area on ontogenetic growth stages and biomass sequestration capacity on the regeneration of these two species. 96 seedlings (H < 30 cm) and saplings (31 < H < 130 cm) were collected in different light conditions in a case study in the Alps (Trentino province, Italy). Leaf Area Index and shoot/root ratio were used as indicators of the ecological conditions (e.g. light, soil moisture, nutrient status) able to influence the seedlings and saplings growth. Two non-linear regressions were fitted to analyse the relationship between height and biomass and to develop the aboveground and below-ground allometric equations. Non-linear regressions show that sapling or seedling height is a good predictor of above-ground and below-ground biomass with a R2aj above 0.8 for all equations and a R2aj above 0.9 for above-ground biomass of Norway spruce. The results show that silvicultural practices may influence the regeneration patterns and increase the biomass allocation rate influencing stand density and canopy cover.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Barbati, A., Corona, P.M., Marchetti, M. 2007. European forest types. Categories and types for sustain able forest management reporting and policy. - European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
Blujdea, V.N.B., Pilli, R., Dutca, I., Ciuvat, L., Abrudan, I.V. 2012. Allometric biomass equations for young broadleaved trees in plantations in Romania. - Forest Ecology and Management, 264, 172-184.
Bolte, A., Villanueva, I. 2006. Interspecifi c competition impacts on the morphology and distribution of fi ne roots in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). - European Journal of Forest Research, 125, 15-26.
British Standard Institute 2009. BS EN 14774-2:2009: Solid biofuels - Determination of moisture content - oven dry method. Part 2: Total moisture - simplifi ed method. BS EN 14774-2:20092009.
Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H., Baumgardner, G.A. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. - Oecologia, 111, 1-11.
Canham, C.D., Marks, P.L. 1985. The response of woody plants to disturbance: patterns of establish ment and growth. - Pickett T.A., White P.S. (eds). The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, 119-217.
Cienciala, E., Černý, M., Apltauer, J., Exnerová, Z. 2005. Biomass functions applicable to European beech. - Journal of Forest Science, 51, 147-154.
Claesson, S., Sahlén, K., Lundmark, T., 2001. Functions for biomass estimation of young Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. From stands in Northern Sweden with high stand densities. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 138-146.
Claveau, Y., Messier, C., Comeau, P.G. 2005. Interacting infl uence of light and size on aboveground biomass distribution in sub-boreal conifer with contrasting shade tolerance. - Tree Physiology, 25, 373-384.
Cunningham, C., Zimmermann, N.E., Stoeckli, V., Bugmann, H. 2006. Growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) saplings in subalpine forests in Switzerland: Does spring climate matter? - Forest Ecology and Management, 228, 19-32.
Curt, T., Coll, L., Prevosto, B., Balandier, P., Kunstler, G. 2005. Plasticity in growth, biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition. - Annals of Forest Science, 62, 51-60.
DeLucia, E.H., Sipe, T.W., Herrick, J., Maherali, H. 1998. Sapling biomass allocation and growth in the understory of a deciduous hardwood forest. - American Journal of Botany, 85, 955-963.
Durkaya, B., Durkaya, A., Makineci, E., Ülküdür, M. 2013. Estimation of above-ground biomass and sequestered carbon of Taurus Cedar (Cedrus libani L.) in Antalya, Turkey. - iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 6, 278-284.
Elliott, K.J., Clinton, B.D. 1993. Equations for estimating biomass of herbaceous and woody vegetation in early-successional Southern Appalachian pine-hardwood forests. - Research Note SE-365, Forest Service, U.S.D.A. United States Department of Agriculture.
Fotelli, M.N., Gessler, A., Peuke, A.D., Rennenberg, H. 2001. Drought affects the competitive interactions between Fagus sylvatica seedlings and an early successional species, Rubus fruticosus: responses of growth, water status and delta13C composition. - New Phytologist, 151, 427-435.
Geudens, G., Staelens, J., Kint, V., Goris, R., Lust, N. 2004. Allometric biomass equations for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings during the first years of establishment in dense natural regeneration. - Annals of Forest Science, 61, 653-659.
Götmark, F., Fridman, J., Kempe, G., Norden, B. 2005. Broadleaved tree species in conifer-dominated forestry: Regeneration and limitation of saplings in southern Sweden. - Forest Ecology and Management, 214, 142-157.
Green, C., Tobin, B., O’Shea, M., Farrell, E.P., Byrne, K.A. 2007. Above- and belowground biomass mea surements in an unthinned stand of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchenisis (Bong) Carr.). - European Journal of Forest Research, 126, 179-188.
Jarčuška, B. 2009. Growth, survival, density, biomass partitioning and morphological adaptations of na tural regeneration in Fagus sylvatica. A review. - Dendrobiology, 61, 3-11.
Jarčuška, B. 2011. Morphological plasticity of leaves in natural regeneration of Fagus sylvatica L.: effects of direct and diffuse light, ontogeny and shoot type. - Polish Journal of Ecology, 89, 339-353.
Jonckheere, I., Muys, B., Coppin, P. 2005. Allometry and evaluation of in situ optical LAI determination in Scots pine: a case study in Belgium. - Tree Physiology, 25, 723-732.
Kobe, R.K., Hogarth, L.J. 2007. Evaluation of irradiance metrics with respect to predicting sapling growth. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37, 1203-1213.
Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Moravčík, M., Lukac, M. 2010. Biomass partitioning and growth effi ciency in four naturally regenerated forest tree species. - Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 234-243.
Levy, P.E., Hale, S.E., Nicoll, B.C. 2004. Biomass expan sion factors and root: shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. - Forestry, 77, 421-430.
Liang, S., Li, X., Wang, J. 2012. Advanced Remote Sen sing: Terrestrial Information Extraction and Applications. Amsterdam, Academic Press. 799 p.
Lundqvist, L., Fridman, E. 1996. Infl uence of local stand basal area on density and growth of rege ne ration in uneven-aged Picea abies stands. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 11, 364-369.
Madsen, P., Larsen, J.B. 1997. Natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with respect to canopy density, soil moisture and soil carbon content. - Forest Ecology and Management, 97, 95-105.
McKay, H.M., Jinks, R.L., McEvoy, C. 1999. The effect of desiccation and rough-handling on the survival and early growth of ash, beech, birch and oak seedlings. - Annals of Forest Science, 56, 391-402.
Mitt, R., Padari, A., Samsonov, M. 2014. Modelling of woody biomass on electricity pylons. - Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 60, 44-56.
Øyen, B,-H., Nilsen, P., Bøhler, F., Andreassen, K. 2011. Predicting individual tree and stand diameter increment responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) after mountain forest selective cutting. - Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 55, 33-45.
Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Lukac, M. 2011. Individual biomass factors for beech, oak and pine in Slovakia: A comparative study in young naturally rege nerated stands. - Trees - Structure and Function, 25, 277-288.
Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Marušák, R. 2013. Aboveground net primary productivity in young stands of beech and spruce. - Forestry Journal, 59, 154-162.
Pastorella, F., Paletto, A. 2013. A comparative analysis of image processing softwares to indirect esti mation of leaf area index in forest ecosystems. - Folia Oecologica, 40, 225-236.
Penman, J., Gytarsky, M., Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Kruger, T., Pipatti, D., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, T., Wagner, F. (eds). 2004. IPCC good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES). Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Petriţan, A.M., Lüpke, B., Petriţan, I.C. 2008. Infl uence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings. - European Journal of Forest Research, 128, 61-74.
Platt, K.H., Allen, R.B., Coomes, D.A., Wiser, S.K. 2004 Mountain beech seedling responses to removal of below-ground competition and fertiliser addition. - New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 28, 289-293.
Price, D.T., Zimmermann, N.E., Van Der Meer, P.J., Lexer, M.J., Leadley, P., Jorritsma, I.T.M., Clark, D.F., Lasch, P., Mcnulty, S., Wu, J., Smith, B. 2001. Regeneration in gap models: priority issues for studying forest responses to climate change. - Global Environmental Change, 51, 475-508.
R Core Team 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [WWW Document]. - URL http://www.R-project.org/ [Accessed 30 November 2014].
Ritson, P., Sochacki, S. 2003. Measurement and pre diction of biomass and carbon content of Pinus pinaster trees in farm forestry plantations, south-western Australia. - Forest Ecology and Management, 175, 103-117.
Ritter, E., Dalsgaard, L., Einhorn, K.S. 2005. Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. - Forest Ecology and Management, 206, 15-33.
Ruiz-Peinado, G.R., Montero, G., del Rio, M. 2012. Biomass models to estimate carbon stocks for hard wood tree species. - Forest Systems, 21, 42-52.
Schall, P., Lödige, C., Beck, M., Ammer, C. 2012. Biomass allocation to roots and shoots is more sensitive to shade and drought in European beech than in Norway spruce seedlings. - Forest Ecology and Management, 266, 246-253.
Schmidt, A., Poulain, M., Klein, D., Krause, K., Peña-Rojas, K., Schmidt, H., Schulte, A. 2009. Allometric above-belowground biomass equations for Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp. & Endl.) natural regeneration in the Chilean Patagonia. - Annals of Forest Science, 66, 513-520.
Skovsgaard, J.P., Nord-Larsen, T. 2012. Biomass, basic density and biomass expansion factor functions for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Denmark. - European Journal of Forest Research, 131, 1035-1053.
Teobaldelli, M., Somogyi, Z., Migliavacca, M., Usoltsev, V.A. 2009. Generalized functions of biomass expansion factors for conifers and broadleaved by stand age, growing stock and site index. - Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 1004-1013.
Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., Korzukhin, M. 1997. Biomass estimations for 65 North American tree species. - Forest Ecology and Management, 97, 1-24.
Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., Parker, W.C. 2000. Estimating biomass of white spruce seedlings with vertical photo imagery. - New Forest, 20, 145-162.
Tognetti, R., Minotta, G., Pinzauti, S., Michelozzi, M., Borghetti, M. 1998. Acclimation to changing light conditions of long-term shade-grown beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings of different geographic origins. - Trees, 12, 326-333.
UNFCCC. 1992. United Nations Framework Con - vention on Climate Change. FCCC/INFORMAL/84. Retrieved February 2010. [WWW Document]. - URL www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdfl . [Accessed 30 November 2014].
UNFCCC. 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. [WWW Document]. - URL http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf. [Accessed 30 November 2014].
Wagner, S., Collet, C., Madsen, P., Nakashizuka, T., Nyland, R.D., Sagheb-Talebi, K. 2010. Beech regeneration research: From ecological to silvicultural aspects. - Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 2172-2182.
Watson, D.J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies in growth of fi eld crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. - Annals of Botany, 11, 41-76.