Supplementary irrigation at container nursery

Grzegorz Durło 1 , Krystyna Jagiełło-Leńczuk 1 , Mariusz Kormanek 2 , Stanisław Małek 3  and Jacek Banach 4
  • 1 University of Agriculture in Kracow, Faculty of Forestry, Institute of Forest Ecosystems Protection, Department of Forest Protection Entomology and Forest Climatology, 31–425, Kraków, Poland
  • 2 University of Agriculture in Kracow, Faculty of Forestry, Institute of Forest Utilization and Forest Technology, Department of Forest Work Mechanization, 31–425, Kraków, Poland
  • 3 University of Agriculture in Kracow, Faculty of Forestry, Institute of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Department of Forest Ecology and Reclamation, 31–425, Kraków, Poland
  • 4 University of Agriculture in Kracow, Faculty of Forestry, Institute of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Department of Genetics and Forest Tree Breeding, 31–425, Kraków, Poland

Abstract

For the period from the 1st of May to the 30th of October 2014, the water balance for Scots pine, Norway spruce, Pedunculate oak and European beech seedlings in a plantation setting was analysed. The experiment was conducted at the container nursery in the Rudy Raciborskie Forest District, Poland. Water was supplied by natural rainfall as well as a by small-droplet irrigation system and two automatic weather stations combined with 32 rain collectors were used to monitor rainfall throughout this research. Rain gauges were located 25 cm above the metal pallets and 10 cm below the nursery containers. An average of 987 mm∙m−2 of water reached the plantation, of which 53% were provided by the irrigation system. Most water was supplied to the oak field, whereas least was given to the spruce plantations and the irrigation water amounted to 535 liters and 422 liters per square meter, respectively. The amount of water percolating through the substrate was approximately 50–65%, depending on the tree species. An average sum of evapotranspiration at the container nursery was estimated to amount to 520 mm∙m−2 during the growth season leading to a total water balance of +463 mm.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aston A.R. 1979. Rainfall interception by eight small trees. Journal of Hydrology 42: 383–396 DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(79)90057-X.

  • Beeson R.C, Arnold M.A., Bilderback T.E., Bolusky B., Chandler S., Gramling H.M., Lea-Cox J.D., Harris J.R., Klinger P.J., Mathers H.M., Ruter J.M., Yeager T.H. 2004. Strategic vision of container nursery irrigation in the next ten years. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 22(2): 113–115.

  • Belcher E.W. 1975. Influence of substrate moisture level on the germination of seed of selected Pinus species. Seed Science and Technology 3: 597–604.

  • Beeson R.C., Knox G.W. 1991. Analysis of efficiency of overhead irrigation in container production. HortScience 26: 847–850.

  • Bilderback T.E. 2002. Water management is key in reducing nutrient runoff from container nurseries. HortTechnology 12: 4541–4544.

  • Cameron R.W, Wilkinson S., Davies W.J., Harrison-Murray R.S., Dunstan D., Burgess C. 2004. Regulation of plants growth in container grown ornamentals through the use of controlled irrigation. Acta Horticulturae 630: 305–312. DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.630.38.

  • Charlesworth P. 2000. Soil water monitoring. National program for irrigation research and development. CSIRO Land and Water. ISBN 0 642760551.

  • Cerny T.A., Kuhns M., Kapp K.L. 2002. Efficient irrigation of trees and shrubs. Utah State University Extension Publications 523: 1–5.

  • Chochura P. 2006. Strategia nawożenia roślin w szkółce. Nawożenie szkółek gruntowych i pojemnikowych [Fertilizing strategy of plants in the nursery. Ferilization in ground and container nursery]. Szkółkarstwo 3.

  • Day R.J. 1980. Effective nursery irrigation depends on regulation of soil moisture and aeration. Proceedings, North American Forest Tree Nursery Soils Workshop 1: 52–71.

  • Dijk A.I., Bruijnzeel L.A. 2001. Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using and adapted analytical model. Part 1 Model description. Journal of Hydrology 247: 230–248. DOI 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00392-4.

  • Dong A., Grattan S.R., Carroll J.J., Prashar C.R.K. 1992. Estimation of daytime net radiation over well-watered grass. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage engineering 118(3): 466–479. DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1992)118:3(466).

  • Feliksik E., Durło G.B. 2004. Climatological characterization of the area of the Carpathian Regional Gene Bank in the Wisła Forest District. Dendrobiology 51: 47–55.

  • Gaskin G.D., Miller J.D. 1996. Measurement of soil water content using simplified impedance measuring technique. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 63: 153–160. DOI 10.1006/jaer.1996.0017.

  • Goodwin P.B., Murphy M., Melville P., Yiasoumi W. 2003. Efficiency of water and nutrient use in containerized plants irrigated by overhead, drip or capillary irrigation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43: 189–194. DOI 10.1071/EA02030.

  • Heiskanen J. 1995a Water status of sphagnum peat and a peat-perlite mixture in containers subjected to irrigation regimes. HortScience 30(2): 281–284.

  • Heiskanen J. 1995b. Physical properties of two-component growth media based on sphagnum peat and their implications for plant-available water and aeration. Plant and Soil 172: 45–54. DOI 10.1007/BF00020858.

  • Helenius P., Luoranen J., Rikala R., Leinonen K. 2002. Effect of drought on growth and mortality of actively growing Norway spruce container seedlings planted in summer. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17: 218–224. DOI 10.1080/028275802753742882.

  • Jensen M.E., Burman R.D., Allen R.G. (Eds.) 1990. Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice, no. 70. ISBN 10 0872627632.

  • Lamack W.F., Niemiera A.X. 1993. Application method affects water application efficiency of spray stake-irrigated containers. HortScience 28: 6625–6627.

  • Langerud B.R., Sandvik M. 1991. Transpiration of containerized Picea abies seedlings grown 442 with different irrigation regimes. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 6: 79–90. DOI 10.1080/02827589109382651.

  • Marosz A. 2013. Systemy nawadniania i zużycie wody w szkółkach roślin ozdobnych w Polsce [Irrigation system and water consumption in nurseries of ornamental plants in Poland]. Infrastruktura i Ekologia Terenów Wiejskich 3: 137–152.

  • McDonald S.E. 1984. Irrigation in forest-tree nurseries: monitoring and effects on seedling growth, in: Duryea M.L., Landis T.D. (Eds.) Forest nursery manual: Production of bareroot seedlings. Martinus Nijhoff and Dr W. Junk Publish The Hague, Boston/Lancaster for Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, vol. 11. ISBN 978-90-247-2913-5.

  • Million J, Yeager T. 2012. Measuring the irrigation requirement of container grown nursery plants. UF/IFAS Extension ENH 1197 USA.

  • Prévost M., Stein J., Plamondon A.P. 1989. Water balance and irrigation planning in a forest tree nursery. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19(5): 575–579. DOI 10.1139/x89-090.

  • Snyder R.L., Pruitt W.O. 1992. Evapotranspiration data management in California. Irrigation and Drainage Session Proceedings Water Forum, ASCE 2–6 August 1992, Baltimore M.D., 1: 128–133. ISBN 9780784414057.

  • Stubbs K.P. 1977. Water balance and irrigation scheduling in the forest nursery, Koksilah, British Columbia: a Case Study MA thesis, University of Victoria BC.

  • Szabla K., Pabian R. 2003. Szkółkarstwo kontenerowe. Nowe technologie i techniki w szkółkarstwie leśnym [Cointainer nursery. New technologies and techniques in forestry nurseries]. Centrum Informacji Lasów Państwowych. Warszawa, Polska. ISBN 978-83-89744-80-7.

  • Szabla K. 2009. Hodowlane i ekonomiczne aspekty produkcji materiału sadzeniowego z zakrytym systemem korzeniowym poddanego zabiegowi sterowanej mikoryzacji [Silvicultural and economic aspects of container-grown seedling production subjected to controlled mycorrhization]. Sylwan 153(4): 253–259.

  • Treder W. 2007. Możliwości wykorzystania czujników pojemnościowych do kontrolowania nawadniania szkółek [The possibilities of using capacitive sensors to irrigation control in nurseries]. Materiały XI Ogólnokrajowej Konferencji Szkółkarska, ISK, Skierniewice, 77–84.

  • Veijalainen A.M., Juntunen M.L., Heiskanen J., Lilja A. 2007. Growing Picea abies container seedlings in peat and composted forest-nursery waste mixtures for forest regeneration. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 22(5): 390–397. DOI 10.1080/02827580701647271.

  • Warren S.L., Bilderback T.E. 2004. Irrigation timing: effect on plant growth, photosynthesis, water-use efficiency and substrate temperature. Acta Horticulturae 644: 29–37. DOI 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.644.1.

  • Warsaw A.L. 2009. Irrigation management in container nursery production to reduce water use, runoff and offsite movement of agricultural chemicals. MSc Thesis, Michigan State University UMI 1468379, ProQuest LLC Edit 48106 MI 1346.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search