Defence reactions of mature Norway spruce (Picea abies) before and after inoculation of the blue-stain fungus Endoconidiophora polonica in a drought stress experiment

Open access

Abstract

We performed an inoculation experiment using the blue-stain fungus Endoconidiophora polonica at the Rosalia Roof study site, which was set up to study drought effects on Norway spruce susceptibility to attacks by the European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus. Tree resistance parameters such as resin flow rate and extent of hypersensitive wound reaction in the phloem were investigated prior to and after fungal infection. Sample trees with different drought treatments (trees fully covered or semi-covered by roofs, control trees) were inoculated with E. polonica in July 2014. In order to check for areas of phloem necrosis, the outer bark around the inoculation holes was scratched off 6 weeks later. We recorded the amount of resin exudation within 12 hours overnight in August and September 2013 and 2014. Although wound reaction zones did not differ in size between tree collectives of the various treatments, fully covered trees tended to exhibit larger necrotic areas compared to control trees. The least water supplied trees showed lowest resin flow rates prior to fungal inoculation, but were the only group to show significantly enhanced resin flow five weeks after the evaluation of defence reactions. Our results agree with earlier findings that wounding and few fungal inoculations can increase tree resistance in the medium term given not too severe water stress. Further investigations will clarify how water stress affects the availability of non-structural carbohydrates for secondary metabolism, when depletion of resources eventually occurs, and at which point trees are most susceptible to bark beetle attack.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anderegg W. R. L. Hicke J. A. Fisher R. A. Allen C. D. Aukema J. Bentz B. et al. 2015: Tree mortality from drought insects and their interactions in a changing climate. New Phytologist 208:674–683.

  • Baier P. 1996: Defence reactions of Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) to controlled attacks of Ips typographus (L.) (Col. Scolytidae) in relation to tree parameters. Journal of Applied Entomology 120:587–593.

  • Baier P. Führer E. Kirisits T. Rosner S. 2002: Defence reactions of Norway spruce against bark beetles and the associated fungus Ceratocystis polonica in secondary pure and mixed species stands. Forest Ecology and Management 159:73–86.

  • Blackwell E. 2011: Risk assessment of bark beetle outbreaks after an avalanche occurrence in the Dürrenstein Wilderness Area. Master thesis at the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU) Austria.

  • Boone C. K. Aukema B. H. Bohlmann J. Carroll A. L. Raffa K. F. 2011: Efficacy of tree defence physiology varies with bark beetle population density: a basis for positive feedback in eruptive species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 1174–1188.

  • Brignolas F. Lacroix B. Lieutier F. Sauvard D. Drouet A. Claudot A.-C. et al. 1995: Induced responses in phenolic metabolism in two Norway spruce clones after wounding and inoculations with Ophiostoma polonicum a bark beetle-associated fungus. Plant Physiology 109:821–827.

  • Brignolas F. Lieutier F. Sauvard D. Christiansen E. Berryman A. A. 1998: Phenolic predictors for Norway spruce resistance to the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and an associated fungus Ceratocystis polonica. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28:720–728.

  • Bryant J. P. Chapin III F. S. Klein D. R. 1983: Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory (hare Lepus capensis). Oikos 40:357–368.

  • Christiansen E. Waring R. H. Berryman A. A. 1987: Resistance of conifers to bark beetle attack: searching for general relationships. Forest Ecology and Management 22:89–106.

  • Christiansen E. Glosli A. M. 1996: Mild Drought enhances the Resistance of Norway spruce to a Bark Beetle transmitted Blue-stain Fungus. In: Mattson W. J. Niemelä P. Rousi M. (eds.): Dynamics of forest herbivory: quest for pattern and principle. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-183 N.C. Forest Experimental Station St. Paul NM 55108 p. 192–199.

  • Christiansen E. Bakke A. 1997: Does Drought really enhance Ips typographus Epidemics? – A Scandinavian Perspective. In: Grégoire J. C. Liebhold A. M. Stephen F. M. Day K. R. Salom S. M. (eds.): Proceedings of the IUFRO working parties S7.03.03 S7.03.05 S7.03.07 joint meeting: Integrating cultural tactics into the management of bark beetle and reforestation pests. 1–3 September 1996 Vallombrosa Italy. General Technical Report NE-236. Radnor PA. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.

  • Christiansen E. Krokene P. Berryman A. A. Franceschi V. R. Krekling T. Lieutier F. et al. 1999: Mechanical injury and fungal infection induce acquired resistance in Norway spruce. Tree Physiology 19:399–403.

  • Croisé L. Lieutier F. Cochard H. Dreyer E. 2001: Effects of drought stress and high density stem inoculations with Leptographium wingfieldii on hydraulic properties of young Scots pine trees. Tree Physiology 21:427–436.

  • De Beer Z. W. Duong T. A. Barnes I. Wingfield B. D. Wingfield M. J. 2014: Redefining Ceratocystis and allied genera. Studies in Mycology 79:187–219.

  • Dunn J. P. Lorio P.L. Jr. 1993: Modified water regimes after photosynthesis xylem water potential cambial growth and resistance of juvenile Pinus taeda L. to Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Physiological and Chemical Ecology 22:948–957.

  • Dreyer E. Guérard N. Lieutier F. Pasquier-Barré F. Lung B. Piou D. 2002: Interactions between nutrients and water supply to potted Pinus sylvestris trees and their susceptibility to several pests and pathogens. In: Lieutier F. (ed.): Effects of Water Stress on Pine Susceptibility to various Pest and Disease Guilds. Final Scientific Report of the EU Project FAIR 3 CT96-1854 172 p.

  • Eyles A. Bonello P. Ganley R. Mohammed C. 2010: Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees. New Phytologist 185:893–908.

  • Ferrenberg S. Kane J. M. Langenhan J. M. 2015: To grow or defend? Pine seedlings grow less but induce more defences when a key resource is limited. Tree Physiology 35:107–111.

  • Fossdal C. G. Yaqoob N. Krokene P. Kvaalen H. Solheim H. Yakovlev I. A. 2012: Local and systemic changes in expression of resistance genes nb-lrr genes and their putative microRNAs in Norway spruce after wounding and inoculation with the pathogen Ceratocystis polonica. BMC Plant Biology 12:105.

  • Franceschi V. R. Krokene P. Christiansen E. Krekling T. 2005: Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist 167:353–376.

  • Führer E. Lindenthal J. Baier P. 1997: Baummortalität bei Fichte: Zusammenhänge zwischen prämortaler Vitalitätsdynamik und dem Befall durch rindenbrütende Insekten. Mitteilungen Deutsche Gesellschaft für allgemeine und angewandte Entomologie 11:645–648.

  • Gasch J. 1985: Standortserkundung und Standortskartierung mit allgemeiner Waldbauplanung im Lehrforst Ofenbach der Universität für Bodenkultur. Diploma thesis University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU) Austria.

  • Gaylord M. L. Kolb T. E. Pockman W. T. Plaut J. A. Yepez E. A. Macalady A.K. et al. 2013: Drought predisposes pinyon-juniper woodlands to insect attacks and mortality. New Phytologist 198:567–578.

  • Gaylord M. L. Kolb T. E. McDowell N.G. 2015: Mechanisms of piñon pine mortality after severe drought: a retrospective study of mature trees. Tree Physiology 35:806–816.

  • Grubelnik R. 1998: Untersuchungen über die Zusammensetzung der Mycoflora von Ips typographus L. auf ausgewählten Wald-Standorten unter besonderen Berücksichtigung der pathogenen Art Ceratocystis polonica. Diploma thesis at the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU) Austria.

  • Herms D. A. Mattson W. J. 1992: The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67:283–335.

  • Hulcr J. Atkinson T. H. Cognato A. I. Jordal B. H. McKenna D. D. 2015: Morphology Taxonomy and Phylogenetics of Bark Beetles. In: Vega F. E. Hofstetter R. W. (eds.): Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species. Elsevier Inc. San Diego p. 41–84.

  • Kirisits T. 2004: Fungal Associates of European Bark Beetles with special Emphasis on the Ophiostomatoid Fungi. In: Lieutier F. Day K. R. Battisti A. Grégoire J-C. (eds.): Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe a synthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht Netherlands p. 181–235.

  • Kirisits T. Dämpfle L. Kräutler K. 2013: Hymenoscyphus albidus is not associated with an anamorphic stage and displays slower growth than Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus on agar media. Forest Pathology 43 p. 386–389.

  • Knebel L. Robison D. J. Wentworth T. R. Klepzig K. D. 2008: Resin flow responses to fertilization wounding and fungal inoculation in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) in North Carolina. Tree Physiology 28:847–853.

  • Krokene P. Christiansen E. Solheim H. Franceschi V. R. Berryman A. A. 1999: Induced resistance to pathogenic fungi in Norway spruce. Plant Physiology 121:565–569.

  • Krokene P. Solheim H. Christiansen E. 2001: Induction of disease resistance in Norway spruce (Picea abies) by necrotizing fungi. Plant Pathology 50:230–233.

  • Krokene P. Solheim H. Krekling T. Christiansen E. 2003: Inducible anatomical defence responses in Norway spruce stems and their possible role in induced resistance. Tree Physiology 23:191–197.

  • Krokene P. Lahr E. Dalena L. S. Skrøppa T. Solheim H. 2012: Effect of phenology on susceptibility of Norway spruce (Picea abies) to fungal pathogens. Plant Pathology 61:57–62.

  • Lieutier F. Sauvard D. Brignolas F. Picron V. Yart A. Bastien C. Jay-Allemand C. 1996: Changes in phenolic metabolites of scots-pine phloem induced by Ophiostoma brunneo-ciliatum a bark-beetle-associated fungus. European Journal of Forest Pathology 26:145–158.

  • Lieutier F. Brignolas F. Sauvard D. Yart A. Galet C. Brunet et al. 2003: Intra- and inter-provenance variability in phloem phenols of Picea abies and relationship to a bark beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiology 23:247–256.

  • Lieutier F. 2004: Host Resistance to Bark Beetles and its Variations. In: Lieutier F. Day K. R. Battisti A. Gregoire J. C. Evans H. F. (eds.): Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe a synthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Dordrecht Netherlands p. 135–180.

  • Lieutier F. Yart A. Salle A. 2009: Stimulation of tree defences by Ophiostomatoid fungi can explain attack success of bark beetles on conifers. Annals of Forest Science 66:801.

  • Lombardero M. J. Ayres M. P. Lorio P. L. Ruel J. J. 2000: Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible defences of Pinus taeda. Ecology Letters 3:329–339.

  • Lorio P. L. jr. Stephen F. M. Paine T. D. 1995: Environment and ontogeny modify loblolly pine response to induced acute water deficits and bark beetle attacks. Forest Ecology and Management 73:97–110.

  • Marini M. Ayres M. P. Battisti A. Faccoli M. 2012: Climate affects severity and altitudinal distribution of outbreaks in an eruptive bark beetle. Climatic Change 115:327–341.

  • Martikainen P. Siitonen J. Kaila L. Punttila P. Rauh J. 1999: Bark beetles (Coleoptera Scolytidae) and associated beetle species in mature managed and old growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management 116:233–245.

  • Mason P. A. Singer M. S. 2015: Defensive mixology: Combining acquired chemicals towards defence. Functional Ecology 29:441–450.

  • Netherer S. Matthews B. Katzensteiner K. Blackwell E. Henschke P. Hietz P. et al. 2015: Do water limiting conditions predispose Norway spruce to bark beetle attack? New Phytologist 205:1128–1141.

  • Niinemets Ü. 2010: Responses of forest trees to single and multiple environmental stresses from seedlings to mature plants: Past stress history stress interactions tolerance and acclimation. Forest Ecology and Management 260:1623–1639.

  • Novak M. Krajnc A. U. Lah L. Zupanec N. Krasevec N. Krizman M. et al. 2014: Low-density Ceratocystis polonica inoculation of Norway spruce (Picea abies) triggers accumulation of monoterpenes with antifungal properties. European Journal of Forest Research 133:573–583.

  • Rosner S. Hannrup B. 2004: Resin canal traits relevant for constitutive resistance of Norway spruce against bark beetles: environmental and genetic variability. Forest Ecology and Management 200:77–87.

  • Ryan M. G. Sapes G. Sala A. Hood S. M. 2015: Tree physiology and bark beetles. New Phytologist 205:955–957.

  • Sallé A. Hui Y. Yart A. Lieutier F. 2008: Seasonal water stress and the resistance of Pinus yunnanensis to a bark-beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiology 28:679–687.

  • Seidl R. Müller J. Hothorn T. Bässler C.·Heurich M. Kautz M. 2015: Small beetle large-scale drivers: how regional and landscape factors affect outbreaks of the European spruce bark beetle. Journal of Applied Ecology 9:1365–2664.

  • Skrøppa T. Solheim H. Hietala A. 2015: Variation in phloem resistance of Norway spruce clones and families to Heterobasidion parviporum and Ceratocystis polonica and its relationship to phenology and growth traits. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 30:103–111.

  • Winter M. B. Baier R. Ammer C. 2015: Regeneration dynamics and resilience of unmanaged mountain forests in the Northern Limestone Alps following bark beetle induced spruce dieback. European Journal of Forest Research 134:949–968.

  • Zhao T. Krokene P. Hu J. Christiansen E. Björklund N. Långström B. Solheim H. et al. 2011. Induced terpene accumulation in Norway spruce inhibits bark beetle colonization in a dose-dependent manner. PLoS ONE 6: e26649.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.68

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.18
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.399

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 326 218 7
PDF Downloads 163 119 5