Background: Antidepressants have been found to possess antinociceptive and analgesic properties and are prescribed in the treatment of chronic pain.
Aim: To evaluate the antinociceptive properties of escitalopram after a single administration.
Materials and methods: Forty Wistar rats were used in the study. They were divided into 5 groups (n=8) treated with saline solution (control group), metamizole (150 mg/kg b.w.), escitalopram (5, 10 and 20 mg/kg b.w.) intraperitoneally. The nociceptive tests we used employed thermal (hot plate and plantar test), mechanical (analgesimeter) and chemical (formalin test) stimuli. Criteria for analgesic effect were increased latency in hot plate, plantar test, analgesimeter and decreased paw licking time in formalin test.
Results: The reference analgesic metamizole showed significant analgesic effect in all tests excluding the first phase with formalin. Escitalopram in doses of 5 and 20 mg/kg b.w. increased paw withdrawal latency in analgesimeter at 2 hours compared to control. Escitalopram in a dose of 5 mg/kg b.w. increased the duration of the stay on the hot plate at 1 hour, while doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg b.w. significantly increased this indicator at 1 and 3 hours in comparison to the saline treated group. In the plantar test, escitalopram in all used doses significantly increased the nociceptive response latency compared to control. A dose of 5 mg/kg b.w. decreased hind paw licking time during phase 1 of the formalin test, whereas doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg b.w. decreased phase 2 licking time compared to the control group.
Conclusion: The antidepressant escitalopram has analgesic properties but they are not dose- or time-dependent.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Lee BS, Jun IG, Kim SH, et al. Interaction of morphine and selective serotonin receptor inhibitors in rats experiencing inflammatory pain. J Korean Med Sci 2012;27:430-6.
2. Schreiber S, Pick CG. From selective to highly selective SSRIs: a comparison of the antinociceptive properties of fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram and escitalopram. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2006;16:464-8.
3. Stahl SM. Not so selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. J Clin Psychiatry 1998;59:343-4.
4. Fabre V, Hamon M. [Mechanisms of action of anti-depressants: new data from escitalopram.] Encephale 2003;29 (3 Pt 1):259-65 [French].
5. Rosenberg MB, Carroll FI, Negus SS. Effects of monoamine reuptake inhibitors in assays of acute pain-stimulated and pain-depressed behavior in rats. J Pain 2013;14(3):246-59.
6. Mika J, Zychowska M, Makuch W, et al. Neuronal and immunological basis of action of antidepressants in chronic pain – clinical and experimental studies. Pharmacol Rep 2013;65:1611-21.
7. Jaracz J, Gattner K, Moczko J, et al. Comparison of the effects of escitalopram and nortriptyline on painful symptoms in patients with major depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2015;37:36-9.
8. Barrot M. Tests and models of nociception and pain in rodents. Neuroscience 2012;211:39-50.
9. Le Bars D, Gozariu M, Cadden SW. Animal models of nociception. Pharmacol Rev 2001;53:597-652.
10. Meunier CJ, Burton J, Cumps J, et al. Evaluation of the formalin test to assess the analgesic activity of diflunisal in the rat. Eur J Pharm Sci 1998;6:307-12.
11. Cervantes-Duran C, Rocha-Gonzalez HI, Granados-Soto V. Peripheral and spinal 5-HT receptors participate in the pronociceptive and antinociceptive effects of fluoxetine in rats. Neuroscience 2013;252: 396-409.
12. Fukushima T, Ohtsubo T, Tsuda M, et al. Facilitatory actions of serotonin type 3 receptors on GABAergic inhibitory synaptic transmission in the spinal super-ficial dorsal horn. J Neurophysiol 2009;102:1459-71.
13. Zhao ZQ, Chiechio S, Sun YG, et al. Mice lacking central serotonergic neurons show enhanced inflammatory pain and an impaired analgesic response to antidepressant drugs. J Neurosci 2007;27:6045-53.