Multiplex PCR Assay for Identifi cation and Differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolates

Open access

Abstract

Introduction: Campylobacter spp. are important causative agents of gastrointestinal infections in humans. The most frequently isolated strains of this bacterial genus are Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. To date, genetic methods for bacterial identification have not been used in Bulgaria. We optimized the multiplex PSR assay to identify Campylobacter spp. and differentiate C. jejuni from C. coli in clinical isolates. We also compared this method with the routinely used biochemical methods.

Aim: To identify Campylobacter spp. and discriminate C. coli from C. jejuni in clinical isolates using multiplex PCR assay.

Materials and methods: Between February 2014 and January 2015 we studied 93 stool samples taken from patients with diarrheal syndrome and identified 40 species of Campylobacter spp. in them. The clinical material was cultured in microaerophilic atmosphere, the isolated strains being biochemically diff erentiated (hydrolysis of sodium hippurate for C. jejuni, and hydrolysis of indoxyl acetate for C. coli). DNA was isolated from the strains using QiaAmp MiniKit (QIAGEN, Germany). Twenty strains were tested with multiplex PCR for the presence of these genes: cadF, characteristic for Campylobacter spp., hipO for C. jejuni and asp for C. coli.

Results and discussion: The biochemical tests identified 16 strains of C. jejuni, 3 strains of C. coli, and 1 strain of C. upsaliensis. After the multiplex PCR assay the capillary gel electrophoresis confirmed 16 strains of C. jejuni, 2 strains of C. coli and 2 strains of Campylobacter spp. - because of the presence of the gene cadF. C. jejuni has the gene hipO, and it is possible that this gene may not be expressed in the biochemical differentiation yielding a negative reaction as a result. In comparison, we can conclude that the genetic differentiation is a more accurate method than the biochemical tests.

Conclusion: The multiplex PCR assay is a fast, accurate method for identifi cation of Campylobacter spp. which makes it quite necessary in the clinical diagnostic practice.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Guerry P. Campylobacter fl agella: not just for motility. Trends Microbiol 2007;15(10):456-61.

  • 2. Moore JE Corcoran D Dooley JS et al. Campylobacter. Vet Res 2005;36(3):351-82.

  • 3. Randremanana RV Randrianirina F Sabatier P et al. Campylobacter infection in a cohort of rural children in Moramanga Madagascar. BMC Infect Dis 2014;5(14):372.

  • 4. Coker AO Isokpehi RD Thomas BN Amisu KO Obi CL. Human Campylobacteriosis in Developing Countries. Emerg Infect Dis 2002;8(3):237-44.

  • 5. Lecuit M Abachin E Martin A et al. Immunoproliferative small intestinal disease associated with Campylobacter jejuni. N Engl J Med 2004;15;350(3):239-48.

  • 6. Smith JL. Arthritis Guillain-Barre syndrome and other sequelae of Campylobacter jejuni enteritis Journal of Food Protection 1995;58(10):1153-1170.

  • 7. Steinbrueckner B Haerter G Pelz K Kist M. Routine identifi cation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli from human stool samples. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1999;15;179(2):227-32.

  • 8. Dey SK Nishimura S Okitsu S Hayakawa S Mizuguchi M Ushijima H. Comparison of immunochromatography PCR and culture methods for the detection of Campylobacter bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 2012;91(3):566-8.

  • 9. Denis M Soumet C Rivoal K. Development of a m-PCR assay for simultaneous identifi cation of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli. Lett Appl Microbiol 1999;29(6):406-10.

  • 10. Samosornsuk W Asakura M Yoshida E et al. Isolation and characterization of Campylobacter strains from diarrheal patients in Bangkok and its suburb in Thailand. Jpn J Infect Dis 2015;68(3):209-15.

  • 11. Ali AM Qureshi AH Rafi S et al. Frequency of Campylobacter jejuni in diarrhoea/dysentery in children in Rawalpindi and Islamabad. J Pak Med Assoc 2003;53(11):517-20.

  • 12. WHO Fact sheet N°255October 2011; http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs255/en/

  • 13. Cravioto A Reyes RE Ortega R Fernández G Hernández R López D. Prospective study of diarrhoeal disease in a cohort of rural Mexican children. Epidemiol Infect 1988;101(1):123-34.

  • 14. Butzler JP. Campylobacter from obscurity to celebrity. Clin Microbiol Infect 2004;10(10):868-76.

  • 15. Abdollahpour N. Zendehbad B. Alipour A. Khayatzadeh J. Wild-bird feces as a source of Campylobacter jejuni infection in children’s playgrounds in Iran. Food Control 2015;50:378-381.

  • 16. Dasti JI Tareen AM Lugert R Zautner AE Gross U. Campylobacter jejuni: a brief overview on pathogenicity-associated factors and diseasemediating mechanisms. Int J Med Microbiol 2010; 300(4):205-11.

  • 17. Nayak R Stewart TM Nawaz MS. PCR identifi cation of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by partial sequencing of virulence genes. Mol Cell Probes 2005;19(3):187-93.

  • 18. Linton D Lawson AJ Owen RJ Stanley J. PCR detection identifi cation to species level and fi ngerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli direct from diarrheic samples. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35(10):2568-72.

  • 19. Harzandi N Jamshidi Sh Dezfulian M et al. Molecular detection and speciation of Campylobacter species in children with gastroenteritidis using polymerase chain reaction in Bahomar Hospital of Karaj city. Int J Enteric Pathog 2015;3(2);e21796.

  • 20. Khalid A Enan Abdel Rahim M. El Hussein Elbrissi Atif et al. Multiplex PCR for direct identifi cation of Campylobacter species in human stool. JBPRAU 2015;4(3):70- 73.

  • 21. Ivanova K Мarinа M Petrov P Kantardjiev T. Campylobacteriosis and other bacterial gastrointestinal diseases in Sofi a Bulgaria for the period 1987 -2008. Euro Surveill 2010;15(4):19474.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.587

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.311

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 419 298 13
PDF Downloads 339 250 10