Management Control Systems and Innovation Process Efficiency. A Conceptual Model

Dawid Szutowski Ph.D. 1
  • 1 Poznań University of Economics and Business, Faculty of Management, Department of Controlling, Financial Analysis and Valuation, 61-875, Poznań, Poland

Abstract

Research background: There seem to be a research gap concerning the relation between management control and innovation. Previous research in the field has generated inconclusive findings.

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to create a conceptual model representing the relation between management control and innovation.

Research methodology: The study relied on a systematic literature review. The initial search yielded 269 papers, which were later analysed and reduced to select those with a substantial contribution to the purpose of the study. Next, the meta-synthesis method was employed to create a thematic map and extract information from the papers.

Results: The formulated conceptual model indirectly links management control systems to innovation process efficiency through decision-making quality. Furthermore, it connects management control systems indirectly to decision-making quality, through the transactive memory system (specialisation, building credibility and coordination) and shared interpretation schemes. The link between decision-making quality and innovation process efficiency is introduced and based on the concept of an innovation process.

Novelty: The paper fills in the missing link between management control and innovation by introducing decision-making quality into this context.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arundel, A., Kemp, R. (2009). Measuring eco-innovation. Working Paper Series, 31, 1–40.

  • Bernstein, B., Singh, P.J. (2006). An integrated innovation process model based on practices of Australian biotechnology firms. Technovation, 26 (5/6), 561–572.

  • Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R., Kim, Y., Lee, J. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29 (1), 87–111.

  • Bonner, J.M., Ruekert, R., Walker, O. (2002). Upper management control of new product development projects and project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19 (3), 233–245.

  • Brandon, D.P., Hollingshead, A. (2004). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise and people. Organization Science, 15 (6), 633–644.

  • Calantone, R.J., Harmancioglu, N., Dröge. C. (2010). Inconclusive innovation “returns”: A meta-analysis of research on innovation in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27 (7), 1065–1081.

  • Cooper, R.G. (2008). Perspective: The Stage-Gate idea-to-launch process – update, What’s new and NextGen systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 213–232.

  • Cronin, P., Ryan, F., Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a Literature Review. British Journal of Nursing, 17 (1), 38–43. DOI: 10.1177/107808747000500401.

  • Davila, A., Wouters, M. (2004). Designing cost-competitive technology products through cost management. Accounting Horizons, 18 (1), 13–26.

  • Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3 (2), 179–202.

  • Guan, J., Chen, K. (2010). Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations. Technovation, 30 (5–6), 348–358. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.02.001.

  • Hammedi, W., Van Riel, A.C.R., Sasovova, Z. (2013). Improving screening decision making through transactive memory systems: A field study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (2), 316–330. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.01001.x.

  • Hansen, M.T., Birkinshaw, J. (2007). The Innovation Value Chain. Harvard Business Review, 85 (6), 121–130.

  • Henri, J.F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: a resource- based perspective. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 31 (6), 529–558.

  • Hoegl, M., Parboteeah, P. (2006). Team reflexivity in innovative projects. R&D Management, 36 (2), 113–125.

  • Jaworski, B.J., Macinnis. D. (1989). Marketing jobs and management controls: Toward a framework. Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (4), 406–419.

  • Kihlander, I., Ritzén, S. (2012). Compatibility before completeness – Identifying intrinsic conflicts in concept decision making for technical systems. Technovation, 32 (2), 79–89. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.10.005.

  • Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4), 587–604.

  • Lövstål, E., Jontoft, A.M. (2017). Tensions at the intersection of management control and innovation: a literature review. Journal of Management Control, 28 (1), 41–79. DOI: 10.1007/s00187-016-0244-3.

  • Pattikawa, L.H., Verwaal, E., Commandeur. R. (2006). Understanding new product project performance. European Journal of Marketing, 40 (11–12), 1178–1193.

  • Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psy-chology, 12 (4), 378–394.

  • Pesämaa, O. (2017). Personnel- and action control in gazelle companies in Sweden. Journal of Management Control, 28 (1), 107–132. DOI: 10.1007/s00187-016-0242-5.

  • Polit, D., Beck, C. (2006). Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal and Utilization. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

  • Rabino, S. (2001). The accountant’s contribution to product development teams – a case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18, 73–90.

  • Roper, S., Dub, J., Love, J.H. (2008). Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy, 37 (6/7), 961–977.

  • Roth, S. (2015). Non-technological and non-economic innovations. Contribution to a theory of robust innovation. Berlin: Peter Lang.

  • Schultz, C., Salomo, S., De Brentani, U., Kleinschmidt, E.J. (2013). How formal control influences decision-making clarity and innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30 (3), 430–447. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12009.

  • Sethi, R., Iqbal, Z. (2008). Stage-gate controls, learning failure, and adverse effect on novel new products. Journal of Marketing, 72, 118–134.

  • Simons, R. (1994). How new top managers use control systems as levers of strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 15 (3), 169–189.

  • Spano, R., Sarto, F., Caldarelli, A., Vigano, R. (2016). Innovation & Performance Measurement: An Adapted Balanced Scorecard. International Journal of Business and Management, 11 (6), 194–204. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v11n6p194.

  • Strauss, E., Zecher, C. (2013). Management control systems: A review. Journal of Management Control, 23 (4), 233–268.

  • Suomala, P. (2004). The life cycle dimension of new product development performance measurement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 8 (2), 193–221.

  • Szutowski, D. (2016). Innovation and Market Value. Warsaw: Difin.

  • Szutowski, D. (2018) Abnormal market valuation and new product announcements: the role of advancement stage and innovativeness, Innovation, 20 (2), 192–208. DOI: 10.1080/14479338.2018.1428104.

  • Szutowski, D. (2019). The importance of decision-making quality throughout the product innovation development process. In: A., Ujwary-Gil, N., Potoczek (eds.), Network, Innovation, and Competence-based Economy (pp. 125–146). Warsaw: Institute of Economics, Polish Academy of Sciences.

  • Tatikonda, M.V., Montoya-Weiss, M. (2001). Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science, 47 (1), 151–172.

  • Tervala, E., Laine, T., Korhonen, T., Suomala, P. (2017). The role of financial control in new product development: empirical insights into project managers’ experiences. Journal of Management Control, 28 (1), 81–106. DOI: 10.1007/s00187-016-0241-6.

  • Ylinen, M., Gullkvist, B. (2014). The effects of organic and mechanistic control in exploratory and exploitative innovations. Management Accounting Research, 25 (1), 93–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2013.05.001.

  • Zhang, X.-A., Cao, Q., Tjosvold, D. (2011). Linking transformational leadership and team performance: A conflict management approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48 (7), 1586–1611.

  • Zizlavsky, O. (2015). Approaches to innovation process assessment: Complex results from an exploratory investigation. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 7 (25), 1–16. DOI: 10.5772/62052.

  • Zizlavsky, O. (2016). Innovation Scorecard: Conceptual Framework of Innovation Management Control System. Journal of Global Business & Technology, 12 (2), 10–27. DOI: 10.1007/s10514-005-6843-8.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search