Financial Performance in the Light of Corporate Governance in Polish Family Businesses

Open access


The article presents a view (on the basis of theoretical and empirical analysis) of corporate governance models used in Polish family businesses through financial performance. The empirical analysis covered a sample of 24,000 Polish family businesses in the period of 2008–2013. The use of linear regression has allowed the authors to verify the hypothesis concerning the occurrence of differences in profitability ratios in groups of family businesses using variant management models and allowed verifying the relationship between the degree of control and involvement of the owners in management and financial performance. The received results, though inconclusive, indicate that the involvement of the owner in the governance process can affect the financial aspect of a business. The prepared empirical analysis and conclusions of the article contribute to a better understanding of the measures taken on management and control decisions; what is more, they can provide guidance to the owners of family businesses in shaping the corporate governance model.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anderson R.C. Reeb D.M. (2007). Founding family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance58 1301–1328.

  • Ang J.S. Cole R.A. Lin J.W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure Journal of Finance55 81–106.

  • Bartoni R. Caprio L. (2006). The effect of family control on firm value and performance: evidence from continental Europe. European Financial Management12 689–723.

  • Blanco-Mazagatos V. Quevedo-Puente E. Castrillo L.A. (2007). The trade-off between financial resources and agency costs in the family business: an exploratory study. Family Business Review20 199–213.

  • Carney M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice29 249–265.

  • Charbel S. Elie B. Georges S. (2013). Impact of family involvement in ownership management and direction on financial performance of the Lebanese firms. International Strategic Management Review1 30–41.

  • Chrisman J.J. Chua J.H. Kellermanns F.W. Chang E.P.C. (2007). Are family managers agent or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held family firms. Journal of Business Research60 1005–1011.

  • Chrisman J.J. Sharma P. Taggar S. (2007). Family influences on firms: an introduction. Journal of Business Research60 1030–1038.

  • Chua J.H. Chrisman J.J. Bergiel E.B. (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice33 355–372.

  • Corbetta G. Salvato C. (2004). Self-serving or self-actualizing ? Model of man and agency cost in different types of family firms: a commentary on “comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice4 (28) 355–362.

  • Dunn B. (1995). Success themes in Scottish family enterprises: philosophies and practices through the generations. Family Business Review9 17–28.

  • Dyer W.G. Jr. (2006). Examining the ‘family effect’ on firm performance. Family Business Review19 253–273.

  • Eddleston K.A. Kellermanns F.W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: a stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing22 545–565.

  • González M. Guzmán A. Pombo C. Trujillo M.A. (2013). Family firms and debt: Risk aversion versus risk of losing control. Journal of Business Research66 2308–2320.

  • Graves C. Thomas J. (2004). Internationalization of the family business: a longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Globalization and Small Business1 7–27.

  • Habbershon T.G. Williams M. McMillan I.C. (2003). An unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing18 451–465.

  • Hack A. (2009). Sind Familienunternehmen anders? Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme des aktuellen Forschungsstands. Management von Familienunternehmen2 1–29.

  • Kim Y. Gao F.Y. (2013). Does family involvement increase business performance? Family-longevity goals’ moderating role in Chinese family firms. Journal of Business Research66 265–274.

  • Kowalewski O. Talavera O. Stetsyuk I. (2010). Influence of Family Involvement in Management and Ownership of Firm Performance: Evidence from Poland. Family Business Review1 (23) 45–59.

  • Le Breton-Miller I. Miller D. (2009). Agency vs stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33 1169–1191.

  • Lubatkin M.H. (2007). One more time: what is realistic theory of corporate governance? Journal of Organizational Behavior28 59–67.

  • Lubatkin M.H. Durand R. Ling Y. (2007). The missing lens in family firm governance theory: a self-other typology of paternal altruism Journal of Business Research60 1022–1029.

  • Maury B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance12 321–341.

  • Mazzola P. Sciascia S. Kellermanns F.W. (2013). Non-linear effects of family sources of power on performance. Journal of Business Research66 568–574.

  • Miller D. Le Breton-Miller I. (2005). Managing for the Long Run. Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Miller D. Le Breton-Miller I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency stewardship and capabilities. Family Business Review1 (19) 73–87.

  • Miller D. Le Breton-Miller I. Scholnick B. (2008). Stewardship versus stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies45 51–78.

  • Minichilli G. Corbetta I.C. MacMilan A. (2010). Top Management Teams in Family-Controlled Companies: “Familiness” “Faultlines” and Their Impact on Financial Performance. Journal of Management Studies2 (47) 205–222.

  • Miralles-Marcelo J.L. Miralles-Quirós M. del M. Lisboa I. (2014). The impact of family control on firm performance: Evidence from Portugal and Spain. Journal of family Business Strategy5 267–293.

  • Nicholsen G. Kiel G. (2007). Can directors impact performance? A case-based test of three theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review15 585–608.

  • Nordqvist M. Sharma P. Chirico F. (2014). Family Firm Heterogeneity and Governance: A Configuration Approach. Journal of Small Business Management5 (52) 192–209.

  • Schulze W.S. Lubatkin M.H. Dino R.N. (2002). Altruism agency and competitiveness in family firms. Managerial and Decision Economics23 247–259.

  • Schulze W.S Lubatkin M.H. Dino R.N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing18 473–490.

  • Sciascia S. Mazzola P. (2008). Family Involvement in Ownership and Management: Exploring Nonlinear Effects on Performance. Family Business Rewiev4 (21) 331–345.

  • Sirmon D.G. Hitt M.A. (2003). Managing resources: linking unique resources management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice27 339–358.

  • Socha B. Majda A. (2015). Financial performance in the light of corporate governance in Polish family businesses CEST 2015 working paper. Retrieved from:

  • Weber J. Lavelle L. Lowry T. Zellner W. Barrett A. (2003). Family Inc. Business Week3857 100–114.

  • Zahara S.A. Neubaum D.O. Larraneta B. (2007). Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: the moderating role of family involvement. Journal of Business Research60 1070–1079.

  • Zellweger T.M. Eddleston K.A. Kelermanns F.W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy1 (1) 54–63.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 322 188 4
PDF Downloads 194 104 1