Drought and frost tolerance in rhododendron collection of the Mlyňany Arboretum (Slovakia): a screening for future climate

Open access

Abstract

Rhododendrons are jewels of the Mlyňany Arboretum, Institute of Forest Ecology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (IFE SAS). Blossoming in May, they attract thousands of visitors. But recently these woody plants have much suffered from climatic extremes such as summer droughts and winter frosts, associated with the advancing climate change. To assess the rhododendron collection’s stability, its drought and frost injury level were tested in field, in summer 2015 and winter 2017, respectively. The tested parameters were: leaf wilting and electrolyte leakage combined with shrub leaf area, insolation level and overall health state. We found that the drought effect was strong or very strong in only ca. 30% rhododendron species and ca. 10% rhododendron cultivars, and that around 60% shrubs showed no or only moderate symptoms of water deficit. The drought injury level was only associated with the genotype. The most tolerant / sensitive genotypes, commonly occurring in the park, were: R. catawbiense, R. ponticum, R. smirnowii, cv. ‘Boursault’, cv. ‘Cunningham’s White’ and cv. ‘Purpureum Elegans’ / R. fortunei and cv. ‘Tamarindos’. On the other hand, the most frequent response to frost in the observed rhododendron genotypes was moderate injury (28 and 37% for species and cultivars, respectively), nevertheless more than 18% species and almost 6% cultivars exhibited strong frost damage. Despite absence of significant differences in the factor-response between the species, we may suggest this decreasing sequence of the genotypes ordered according to their frost resistance: genotypes: cv. ‘Cunningham’s White’ > R. decorum > R. fortunei and cv. ‘Duke of York’ > R. smirnowii > cvs. ‘Purpureum Elegans’ and ‘Tamarindos’ > R. macrophyllum and cv. ‘Nova Zembla’ > R. catawbiense > R. ponticum. These results have been compared with similar works in rhododendron species/cultivars as well as suggested species drought/frost tolerance derived from climatic conditions in the area of their natural distribution.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alkurdi M.I.S. Supuka J. 2016. Study of Mediterranean woody plants for hardiness in Central Europe conditions. Praha: Powerprint. 94 p.

  • Anisko T. Lindstrom O.M. 1996. Seasonal changes in cold hardiness of Rhododendron L. ‘Catawbiense Boursault’ grown under continuous and periodic water stress. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121 (2): 301–306.

  • Antonelli A.L. Byther R.S. Maleike R.R Collman S.J. 2006. How to identify rhododendron and azalea problems. Extension bulletin (Washington State University. Cooperative Extension) 1229. Pullman Wash.: Cooperative Extension College of Agriculture & Home Economics Washington State University. 28 p.

  • Augé R.M. Stodola A.J.W. Moore J.L. Klingeman W.E. Duan X.G. 2003. Comparative dehydration tolerance of foliage of several ornamental crops. Scientia Horticulturae 98: 511–516.

  • Cameron R. Harrison-Murray R. Fordham M. Wilkinson S. Davies W. Atkinson C. Else M. 2008. Regulated irrigation of woody ornamentals to improve plant quality and precondition against drought stress. Annals of Applied Biology 153: 49–61.

  • Caprar M. Cantor M. Sicora C. 2011. Behavior of Rhododendron species to low and negative temperature in the Botanical Garden Jibou in 2002–2010. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj – Napoca. Horticulture 68 (1): 309–314.

  • Cordero R.A. Nilsen E.T. 2002. Effects of summer drought and winter freezing on stem hydraulic conductivity of Rhododendron species from contrasting climates. Tree Physiology 22: 919–928.

  • Cox P.A. 1985. The smaller rhododendrons. London: B.T. Batsford. 271 p.

  • Czekalski M. 1982. Injuries of rhododendrons in Poland caused by frost during winter 1978/1979. Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu. Ogrodnictvo no. 137: 3–14.

  • Czekalski M. 1998. Rhododendrons in the former Soviet Union. Journal of American Rhododendron Society 52: 2.

  • Ferus P. Hoťka P. Konôpková J. Pastirčák M. Majeská M. Gubiš J. 2016. Zdravotný stav zbierky rododendronov v Arboréte Mlyňany ÚEL SAV: Súčasnosť a vyhliadky do budúcnosti [Health state of rhododendron collection in the Mlyňany Arboretum IFE SAS: current state and future perspectives]. In Barta M. Ferus P.  (eds). Dendrologické dni v Arboréte Mlyňany SAV 2016. Dreviny v meniacom sa prostredí. Recenzovaný zborník príspevkov z vedeckej konferencie. Vieska nad Žitavou 5. októbra 2016. Mlyňany: Arborétum Mlyňany SAV 2016 p. 76–81.

  • Pachauri R.K. Meyer L.A. (eds) 2015. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Geneva: IPCC. 151 p.

  • Juhásová G. Serbinová K. 1997. Metódy hodnotenia zdravotného stavu drevín v mestskom prostredí [Methods for tree health state evaluation in urban environment]. In Pestovanie a ochrana rastlín v mestskom prostredí ošetrenie chránených a pamätných stromov. Zborník zo seminára. Nitra 27. – 28. 5. 1997. Nitra : Ústav ekológie lesa SAV p. 42–68.

  • Ke S.S. 2007. Effect of soil drought stress on water use efficiency of Rhododendron fortunei leaves. Journal of Henan Normal University 35 (2): 150–153.

  • Ke S.S. Yang M.W. 2007a. Effect of water stress on photosynthetic physiological characteristics in leaves of Rhododendron fortunei and their response to light and temperature. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 2007 34 (4): 959–964.

  • Ke S.S. Yang M.W. 2007b. Effect of water stress on antioxidant system and lipid peroxidation in leaves of Rhododendron fortunei. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 34 (5): 1217–1222.

  • Kelly J.D. 1994. Top causes of death in rhododendrons. Journal of American Rhododendron Society 48 (2): [4 p.].

  • Krüssmann G. 1962. Handbuch der Laubgehölze. Band II. Berlin and Hamburg: Paul Parey. 608 p.

  • Larcher W. 2003. Physiological plant ecology. Berlin: Springer. 513 p.

  • Lim C.C. Arora R. Townsend E.C. 1998. Comparing Gompertz and Richards functions to estimate freezing injury in Rhododendron using electrolyte leakage. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 123 (2): 246–252.

  • Lukáčik I. Sarvašová I. Kraličková E. 2011. Vyhodnotenie vybraného sortimentu rodu Rhododendron v rozdielnych ekologických podmienkach [Selected assortment evaluation of genus Rhododendron in different ecological conditions]. In Salaš P. (ed.). Rostlinypodmínkách měnícího se klimatu. Příspěvkykonference ve dnech 20. – 21. 10. 2011 v Lednice. Úroda vědecká příloha časopisu. Praha: Profi Press p. 350–358.

  • Melo M. 2003. Climatic models and their utilization for assessment of climatic changes in Slovakia. PhD thesis. Bratislava: Geophysical Institute SAS. 155 p.

  • Nelson S. 2000. Rhododendrons in the landscape. Portland: Timber Press. 215 p.

  • Neuner G. Ambach D. Aichler K. 1999. Impact of snow cover on photoinhibition and winter desiccation in evergreen Rhododendron ferrugineum leaves during subalpine winter. Tree Physiology 19: 725-732.

  • Peng Y. Reyes J.L. Wei H. Yang Y. Karlson D. Covarrubias A.A. Krebs S.L. Fessehaie A. Arora R. 2008. RcDhn5 a cold acclimation-responsive dehydrin from Rhododendron catawbiense rescues enzyme activity from dehydration effects in vitro and enhances freezing tolerance in RcDhn5-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. Physiologia Plantarum 134: 583–597.

  • Reiley H.E. 2004. Success with rhododendrons and azaleas. Portland: Timber Press. 284 p.

  • Sharp R.G. Else M.A. Cameron R.W. Davies W.J. 2009. Water deficits promote flowering in via regulation of pre and post initiation development. Scientia Horticulturae 120: 511–517.

  • Spann T.M. Heerema R.J. 2010. A simple method for non-destructive estimation of total shoot leaf area in tree fruit crops. Scientia Horticulturae 125 (3): 528–533.

  • Šembera T. Šembera I. Balajka J. Hrabovská J. Fekete F. Lapin M. Šťastný P. Tóth T. 2015. Environmentálna štúdia územných dopadov klimatických zmien [Environmental study on climate change consequences in the land]. Nitra: Nitriansky samosprávny kraj. 138 p.

  • Šiška B. Špánik F. Repa Š. Gálik M. 2005. Praktická biometeorológia [Practical biometeorology]. Nitra: Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita. 144 p.

  • Wei H. Dhanaraj A.L. Arora R. Rowland L.J. Fu Y. Sun L. 2006. Identification of cold acclimation-responsive Rhododendron genes for lipid metabolism membrane transport and lignin biosynthesis: importance of moderately abundant ESTs in genomic studies. Plant Cell and Environment 29: 558–570.

  • Zhang C.Q. Luo J.F. Su Y.F. 2002. The research of drought tolerance on 6 species of Rhododendron. Guangxi Zhiwu 22 (2): 174–176.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.75

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.2
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.511

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 213 137 10
PDF Downloads 109 72 3