The Determination of Performance Measures by Using a Balanced Scorecard Framework

Open access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the contributions of the balanced scorecard (BSC) methods to identify the relationship between the objectives and activities and examine how the BSC should be formed in a manufacturing company. The BSC framework was examined via a case study in a yarn manufacturing company. The activities to be carried out by the company to achieve its objectives and how the appropriate measures are determined in evaluating the contribution of the activities to the achievement of objectives are explained under the BSC approach. The BSC implementation and adaptation have facilitated in a family owned company because of its fast decision-making process. Objectives are made clear in accordance with the company’s strategy and causal relationship between objectives and activities are linked by the strategy map. The BSC implementation shows that financial measures are not enough to evaluate the effects of all the activities on the objectives in a company. The cooperation between departments in the company and the efficiency of corporation meetings increases. The meetings have become more result-oriented due to clarifying objectives and responsibility of individual levels.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Aurelia S. Cardonib A. Del Baldoc M. Lombardid R. 2018. The Balanced Scorecard Logic in the Management Control and Reporting of Small Business Company Networks: A Case Study. Accounting and Management Information Systems 17(2) pp.191-214.

  • [2] Evangelista de Barros O.J. Wanderley C.D.A. 2016. Adaptation of the Balanced Scorecard: Case Study in a Fuel distribution Company. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças 27(72) pp.320-333.

  • [3] Barnabè F. Busco C. 2012. The Causal Relationships between Performance Drivers and Out-comes: Reinforcing Balanced Scorecards’ Implementation through System Dynamics Models. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change 8(4) pp.528-538.

  • [4] Carlström E.D. 2012. Strategies for Change: Adaptation to new Accounting Conditions. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change 8(1) pp. 41-61.

  • [5] Chriyha A. Beidouri Z. Bouksour O. 2012. Proposal of a Performance Model Based on the Balanced Scorecard for the Moroccan Textile Industry. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI) 9(5) pp.410-417

  • [6] Coe N. Letza S. 2014. Two Decades of the Balanced Scorecard: A Review of Developments. The Poznan University of Economics Review 14(1) pp.63-75

  • [7] Costa Oliveira H.M. 2014. The Balanced Scorecard Operating as A Risk Management Tool. Review of Economic Studies & Research Virgil Madgearu 7(2) pp.41-57

  • [8] de Andrade Guerra J.B.S.O. Garcia J. de Andrade Lima M. Barbosa S.B. Heerdt M.L. Berchin I.I. 2018. A Proposal of a Balanced Scorecard for an Environmental Education Program at Universities. Journal of Cleaner Production 172 pp.1674-1690.

  • [9] Dhamayantie E. 2018. Designing A Balanced Scorecard for Cooperatives. International Journal of Organizational Innovation (Online) 11(2) pp.220-227.

  • [10] Gupta G. Salter S.B. 2018. The Balanced Scorecard beyond Adoption. Journal of International Accounting Research 17(3) pp.115-134.

  • [11] Humphreys K.A. Gary M.S. Trotman K.T. 2016. Dynamic Decision Making Using the Balanced Scorecard Framework. The Accounting Review 91(5) pp.1441-1465.

  • [12] Kaplan R. Norton D. 1992. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance Harvard Business Review 70(1) pp.71-79.

  • [13] Kaplan R.S. Norton D.P. 1996a. Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy. California Management Review 39(1) pp.53-79.

  • [14] Kaplan R.S. Norton D.P. 1996b. Knowing the Score. Management Strategy November-December pp.30-33.

  • [15] Kaplan R.S. Norton D.P. 2007. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review 85(7-8) pp.150-161.

  • [16] Karabay G. Kurumer G. 2012. Managing Through Strategic Performance Management in Apparel Companies. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 4 (93) pp.13-19.

  • [17] Kopia J. Kompalla A. Buchmüller M. Heinemann B. 2017. Performance Measurement of Management System Standards Using the Balanced Scorecard. Amfiteatru Economic 19(11) pp.981-1002.

  • [18] Lueg R. Vu L. 2015. Success Factors in Balanced Scorecard Implementations – A literature review. Management Revue 26(4) pp.306-327.

  • [19] Malagueño R. Lopez-Valeiras E. Gomez-Conde J. 2017. Balanced Scorecard in SMEs: Effects on Innovation and Financial Performance. Small Business Economics pp.1-24.

  • [20] Miloloža I. 2018. Impact of Leadership Style to Financial Performance of Enterprises. Business Systems Research Journal: International Journal of the Society for Advancing Business & Information Technology (BIT) 9(1) pp.93-106

  • [21] Narayanamma P.L. Lalitha K. 2016. Balanced Scorecard-The Learning & Growth Perspective. Aweshkar Research Journal 21(2) pp.59-66.

  • [22] Norton D. Kaplan R. 1993. Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work. Harvard Business Review71(5) pp.134-140.

  • [23] Quesado P.R. Aibar Guzmán B. Lima Rodrigues L. 2018. Advantages and Contributions in the Balanced Scorecard Implementation. Intangible Capital 14(1) pp.186-201.

  • [24] Yancy A.A. 2017. Who Adopts Balanced Scorecards? An Empirical Study. International Journal of Business Accounting & Finance 11(2) pp.24-37.

  • [25] Yin R.K. 1994. Case Study Research Design and Methods. California: Sage Publications.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.195
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.326

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 612 612 33
PDF Downloads 482 482 62