Mandatory pension funds in Chile: decline of the arrangement?

Open access


Chile has been both a pioneer and the most radical follower of the idea of converting pension savings into contributions to privately-managed capital funds. Two recent portions of reforms under President Bachelet extended the social safety net as well as re-introduced publicly-administered programs on behalf of retirees.

Does such direction, in the country with the longest lasting evidence of privatized fully-funded pensions mean a fall of the arrangement? The article attempts a political-economic argumentation in aim to form the answer.

The premise is that risk sharing constitutes a crucial issue in insurance industry where old-age security is largely placed. In social security segment the risk of default on liabilities is backed by taxing capacity of the state; in fully-funded-pensions plans normally this is individual contributor who faces the portfolio risk. Therefore change in risk sharing between the contributors to the funds, pension management companies and the state is fundamental for evaluation of the reforms. The review of Chilean reforms reveals an institutional arrangement which is fundamental to risk sharing, namely the relation between contribution and benefit, left intact. This finding supports the conclusion that bringing recently the state back into retirement system can not be conceived as any systemic revolution.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Barr N. Diamond P. (2016). Reforming Pensions in Chile. Polityka Społeczna No.1 4-9. Retrieved from:

  • Barr N. Diamond P. (2010). Pension Reform. A Short Guide. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Barr N. Diamond P. (2008a). Reforming Pensions. ISSR Draft November. Retrieved from [13.03.2015].

  • Barr N. Diamond P. (2008b). Reforming Pensions: Principles and Policy Choices. New York: Oxford University Press

  • Barr N. (2001). The Truth about Pension Reform. Finance and Development 38(3) 6-9 Business in Americas (2016) 3 November. Retrieved from:[6.02.2017]).

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung Transformation Index [BTI] (2016). Chile Country Report. Retrieved from:

  • Credit Suisse (2014). Chile: Pension Fund Snapshot as of May 2014. Economics research 19 June 2014. Retrieved from:

  • Garcia-Huitron M. van Leuvensteijn M. (2015). International Pension Reform Diffusion: A Tale about Chile and the Netherlands Trying to Learn from Each Other. Het Verzekerings-Archief Afl.4 196-200. Retrieved from:

  • Garreton M. (2012). Neoliberalismo corregido y progressimo limitado: los gobiernos concertacion en Chile 1990-2010. Santiago: Editorial Arcis.

  • Hujo K. Rulli M. (2014). The Political Economy of Pension Re-Reform in Chile and Argentina. Toward More Inclusive Protection Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development Research Paper 2014-1 April.

  • Hyde M. (2014). Classical Liberalism and Conservatism: How is Chile’s “Private “ Pension System Best Conceptualised? Reader in Work & Pensions School of Government Plymouth University Plymouth UK. Retrieved from:

  • International Monetary Fund [IMF] (2016). Chile: Staff Concluding Statement of the 2016 Article IV Mission. Retrieved from:

  • Knowledge@Wharton (2009). The Fall of Pension Funds in Chile: A Lesson from the Downturn February 25. Retrieved from:

  • Kritzer B.E. (2008). Chile’s Next Generation Pension Reform. Social Security Bulletin Vol.68 No.2 69-84.

  • Mesa-Lago C. Bertranou F. (2016). Pension Reforms in Chile and Social Security Principles 1981-2015. International Social Security Review Vol.69 Issue 1 January/March: 25-45 DOI:10.111/issr.12093

  • Sarfati H. Ghellab Y. (2012). The Political Economy of Pension Reforms in Times of Global Crisis: State Unilateralism or Social Dialogue? Working Paper No. 37 Geneva: ILO February.

  • Singh A. (1996). Pension Reform the Stock Market Capital Formation and Economic Growth: A Critical Commentary on the World Bank’s Proposals CEPA Working Paper Series I. Center for Economic Policy Analysis. New York: CEPA.

  • Vasquez I. (2016). The Attack on Chile’s Private Pension System August 16 Cato Institute retrieved from

  • Wehlau D. (2007). Lobbying for Pension Reform. Institutional Investors as Driving Forces of Pension Privatisation? Paper prepared for the 14th workshop on alternative economic policy in Europe. September 26th – 28th Brussels: Euromemorandum.

  • World Bank (1994). Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 190 154 13
PDF Downloads 128 104 10