SMEs Capital Structure Determinants: Empirical Evidence from Kazakhstan

Open access


The purpose of this paper is to study the standard firm-factor determinants on capital structure of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). To this end, we analyzed small and medium sized firms in Kazakhstan, where all sectors were considered. We use panel data methods to investigate the determinants of capital structure for non-financial SMEs in Kazakhstan. This study examines the impact of key determinants such as asset tangibility, size, growth, profitability and tax rate of SMEs. The trade-off theory and the pecking order theory of capital structure guided this study. The results suggest that despite some differences in the influence of factors on the capital structure, most of the determinants presented by the theory of finance appear indeed to be relevant for the Kazakhstan small and medium business sector.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anuar H. Chin O. 2016 The development of debt to equity ratio in capital structure model: A case of micro franchising Procedia Econ. Finance 7th International Economics & Business Management Conference (IEBMC 2015) 35 pp. 274-280

  • Bennett M. Donnelly R. 1993 The determinants of capital structure: Some UK evidence Br. Account. Rev. 25 pp. 43-59

  • Booth et al. 2001 Capital Structures in Developing Countries J. Finance 56 pp. 87-130

  • Bradley M. Jarrell G.A. Kim E.H. 1984 On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence J. Finance 39 pp. 857-878

  • Demirgüç-Kunt A.M. Vojislav 1999 Institutions Financial Markets and Firms’ Choice of Debt Maturity Policy Research Working Papers The World Bank

  • Di Pietro F. Palacín-Sánchez M.-J. Roldán J.L. 2018 Regional development and capital structure of SMEs Desarro. Reg. Estruct. Cap. Las PYME 18 37-60

  • Fama E.F. French K.R. 1998 Taxes financing decisions and firm value J. Finance 53 pp. 819-843

  • Frank M.Z. Goyal V.K. 2003 Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure J. Financ. Econ. 67 pp. 217-248

  • Hall G. Hutchinson P. Michaelas N. 2000 Industry effects on the determinants of unquoted SMEs’ capital structure Int. J. Econ. Bus. 7 pp. 297-312

  • Heyman D. Deloof M. Ooghe H. 2008 The financial structure of privately held belgian firms Small Bus. Econ. 30 pp. 301-313

  • Jensen M.C. Meckling W.H. 1976 Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior agency costs and ownership structure J. Financ. Econ. 3 pp. 305-360

  • Kester W.C. 1986 Capital and Ownership Structure: A Comparison of United States and Japanese Manufacturing Corporations.

  • Myers S.C. 1984 The Capital Structure Puzzle J. Finance 39 pp. 574-592

  • Nicos Michaelas et al. 1999 Financial policy and capital structure choice in the U.K. SMEs: Empirical evidence from company Panel Data Small Bus. Econ. 12 113.

  • Öhman P. Yazdanfar D. 2016 Capital structure dynamics among SMEs: Swedish empirical evidence J. Risk Finance 17 pp. 245-260

  • Pettit R.R. Singer R.F. 1985 Small Business Finance: A Research Agenda Financ. Manag. 14 pp. 47-60

  • Rajan R.G. Zingales L. 1995 What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data J. Finance 50 pp. 1421-1460

  • Ross S. 1977 The Determination of financial structure: The incentive-signalling approach Bell J. Econ. 8 pp. 23-40.

  • Rouse J. Jayawarna D. 2006 The financing of disadvantaged entrepreneurs: Are enterprise programmes overcoming the finance gap? Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 12 pp. 388-400

  • Titman et al. 1988 The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice – TITMAN – 1988 The Journal of Finance – Wiley Online Library (accessed 1.11.18).