The dynamics of forest species composition in the Eastern Moscow Region

Vera Kiseleva 1 , Leonid Stonozhenko 1 , 2  and Sergei Korotkov 1 , 3
  • 1 Bauman Moscow State Technical University, , Mytischi Branch, Institutskaya 1, Mytischi, 141005, Moscow Region, Russian Federation
  • 2 All-Russia Institute of Improvement of Professional Skill of Executives and Specialists of Forestry, , Insitutskaya 17, Pushkino, 141200, Moscow Region, Russian Federation
  • 3 Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Forest Science, , Moscow Region, Moscow Region, Russian Federation

Abstract

The forests of urbanised areas provide multiple ecosystem services and are highly dynamic. Determining the trends in species composition changes can help to predict their future capacity to fulfil ecological and resource-maintaining functions. We examined the direction of forest successions in the Northeast Moscow region under the canopy of different tree species. Field data were obtained from 78 permanent test plots monitored for more than a 15-year period; field studies were complemented by archival data. The cluster analysis made it possible to divide all plots into five groups by current species composition and structure and into eight groups by the importance of broadleaved species in the undergrowth. Gradual evolution (cohort dynamics) was found to be typical for middle-aged secondary forests; patch dynamics was described in mature stands of late succession species after non-critical natural disturbances; drastic changes were observed in spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands after pest attacks. Two main trends were revealed in species composition shift: restoration of mixed spruce-broadleaved forests and development of lime-dominated broad-leaved forests, the latter being the prevailing one in the stands of composite forest types. Intensive development of oak-associated species is probably related to the climate conditions in the Moscow megacity.

The content of this article may be of interest for researchers studying natural forest dynamics and can be used for prospective planning of target species composition in the forestries of the Moscow region.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abaturov, A.V., Melankholin, P.N. 2004. Natural forest dynamics at the permanent test plots in Moscow Oblast (in Russian). Grif and K Publishing, Tula, Russia.

  • Angelstam, P.K., Kuuluvainen, T. 2004. Boreal forest disturbance regimes, successional dynamics landscape structures – a European perspective. Ecological Bulletins, 51, 117–136.

  • Annenskaya, G.N. et al. 1997. Landscapes of Moscow Oblast and their current state (in Russian). Smolensk State University, Smolensk, Russia.

  • Axelsson, A.L., Ostlund, L., Hellberg, E. 2002. Changes in mixed deciduous forests of boreal Sweden 1866–1999 based on interpretation of historical records. Landscape Ecology, 17 (5), 403–418.

  • Bergeron, Y., Harvey, B. 1997. Basing silviculture on natural ecosystem dynamics: an approach applied to the Southern boreal mixedwood forests of Quebec. Forest Ecology and Management, 92 (1), 235–242.

  • Braslavskaya, T.Y., Tikhonova, E.V. 2016. The 25-years dynamics of broadleaved tree species distribution on the territory of Zvenigorodskaya Biological Station (Moscow State University) (in Russian with English summary). Proceedings of the 6th All-Russian Conference Aerospace Methods and Geo-information Technologies in Forest Science, Forestry and Ecology. Center of Forest Ecology and Productivity, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 162–166.

  • Connell, J.Y., Slatyer, R.O. 1977. Mechanisms of successions in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. The American Naturalist, 11 (982), 1119–1144.

  • Douda, J. et al. 2015. Vegetation classification and bio-geography of European floodplain forests and alder carrs. Applied Vegetation Science, 19 (1), 147–163. DOI: 10.1111/avsc.12201

  • Ermokhin, M.V., Uglyanets, S.A., Vershitskaya, I.N., Ivkovich, V.S. 2013. State and dynamics of the old-growth spruce forests of the Berezinsky Biosphere Reserve (in Russian, with English summary). In: Proceedings of the 4th International conference Monitoring and assessment of vegetation status (ed. A. V. Pugachevskii). March 2–5, 2013, Minsk, Belarus, 111–113.

  • Frelich, L.E. 2002. Forest dynamics and disturbance regimes: studies from temperate evergreen–deciduous forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Gamfeldt, L. et al. 2013. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nature Communications, 4, 1340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2328

  • Grigorova, E.S. 2004. About the mesoclimate of Moscow megacity (in Russian). Meteorologiya i gidrologiya, 10, 36–45.

  • History and state of Losiny Ostrov forests (in Russian). 2000. Ed. V.V. Nefed’ev. Prima-Press-M Publishing, Moscow.

  • Karminov, V.N., Martynenko, O.V. 2007. Methods of numeric classification in soil studies (in Russian). Lesnoj Vestnik, 7, 76–77.

  • Kiseleva, V.V., Korotkov, S.A., Stonozhenko, L.V., Naidenova E.V. 2019. Structure and regeneration of spruce forests as affected by forest management practices in the Moscow Region. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 226, 012042. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/226/1/012042

  • Kislov, A., Konstantinov, P., Varentsov, M., Samsonov, T., Gorlach, I., Trusilova, K. 2015. Urban amplification of the global warming in Moscow megacity. EGU General Assembly 2015. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 17, EGU2015-5620.

  • Korotkov, S.A., Kiseleva, V.V., Stonozhenko, L.V., Ivanov, S.K., Naidenova, E.V. 2015. On the trends in the forest forming process in North-Eastern Moscow Oblast (in Russian with English summary). Lesotekhnicheskii zhurnal, 3 (19), 41–54.

  • Korotkov, S.A., Makuev, V.A., Lopatnikov, M.V., Nikitin, V.V., Sirotov, A.V., Stonozhenko, L.V. 2016. Forest-Use Issues in Moscow Region at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. Series II – Forestry. Wood Industry. Agricultural Food Engineering, 9 (58), 17–24.

  • Kuuluvainen, T., Aakala, T. 2011. Natural forest dynamics in boreal Fennoscandia: a review and classification. Silva Fennica, 45 (5), 823–841.

  • Lasch, P., Lindner, M., Erhard, V., Suckow, F., Wenzel, A. 2002. Regional impact assessment on forest structure and functions under climate change – the Brandenburg case study. Forest Ecology and Management, 162, 73–86.

  • Lindbladh, M., Axelsson, A.L., Hultberg, T., Brunet, T.J., Felton, A. 2014. From broadleaves to spruce – the borealization of southern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29 (7), 686–696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.960893

  • Lokoshchenko, M.A. 2014. Urban ‘heat island’ in Moscow. Urban Climate, 10, 550–562.

  • Martynenko, O., Karminov, V., Shchepashchenko, D., Ontikov, P. 2018. The dependence of the productivity of pine forests of Moscow Experimental Forestry on soil conditions. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 11, 807–812. DOI: 10.1134/S1995425518070120

  • Maslov, A.A. 2012. Fluctuations and successions in forest communities under climate change (in Russian with English summary). Bulletin of Samara Scientific Research Center of Russian Academy of Sciences, 1 (5), 1316–1319.

  • McEwan, R.W., Dyer, J.M., Pederson, N. 2011. Multiple interacting ecosystem drivers: toward an encompassing hypothesis of oak forest dynamics across eastern North America. Ecography, 34, 244–256. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06390.x

  • Melekhov, I.S. 2007. Forest Science (in Russian). Moscow Forest University, Moscow.

  • Rysin, L.P. 2012. Forests of Moscow Oblast (in Russian). KMK Publishing, Moscow.

  • Schepaschenko, D. et al. 2018. Improved estimates of biomass expansion factors for Russian forests. Forests, 9 (6), 312. DOI: 10.3390/f9060312

  • Shorohova, E., Kuuluvainen, T., Kangur, A., Jõgiste, A.K. 2009. Natural stand structures, disturbance regimes and successional dynamics in the Eurasian boreal forest: a review with special reference to Russian studies. Annals of Forest Science, 66 (2), 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2008083

  • Spiecker, H. et al. 2004. Norway spruce conversion – options and consequences. Research Report 18. Brill: Leiden, Boston, Köln.

  • Sukachev, V.N. 1972. Selected works. Vol. 1. Foundations of forest typology and biogeocoenology (in Russian). Nauka, Leningrad.

  • Terauds, A., Nikodemus, O., Brumelis, G. 2011. Seventy-year changes in tree species composition and tree ages in state-owned forests in Latvia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 26 (5), 446–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2011.586647

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search