The aim of the study was to determine the distribution of prevailing forest types within the catchment areas of the biggest rivers in the north-east of Ukraine. During the allocation of the catchment areas of the studied rivers, the MapInfo Professional 12.5 program and the vector map of Ukraine were used. The research covered the forest area (more than 502,000 ha) of the state forest enterprises managed by the State Forest Resources Agency of Ukraine. The studied area located on the tributaries of the Sula, Psel, Vorskla and Siversky Donets rivers within the Poltava, Kharkiv, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kyiv and Cherkasy administrative regions of Ukraine. The analysis of the forest fund was carried out based on the electronic subcompartment database of the Ukrderzhlisproekt Production Association, using the application software and geoinformation technologies. It was revealed that a large variety of forest types in the tributaries of the Sula, Psel, Vorskla and Siversky Donets rivers as well as the prevalence of fresh fertile maple-lime oak and fresh fairly infertile oak-pine forest types (in 75 tributaries of Psel, Vorskla and Siversky Donets rivers) and fresh fertile maple-lime oak and fresh fertile hornbeam oak forest types (in 20 tributaries of the Sula River) are due to the relief, hydrological and soil-climatic conditions of the studied area, as well as anthropogenic factor. Assuming homogeneous natural conditions, an insignificant number of forest types are formed (up to five). For a large variety of natural conditions, there are at least six forest types that should be taken into account during forest management, along with the characteristics of the catchment areas of tributaries. The analysed data on the total number of forest types in the catchments of rivers would be appropriate to use in the future when creating a single list of forest types for the Left-Bank Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine. The prevalence of certain forest types within the catchment areas of tributaries of the Sula, Psel, Vorskla and Siversky Donets rivers directly depends on the soil and climatic conditions, geomorphological structure, relief and anthropogenic influence in the forests. The results should be used in forest management activities to preserve and restore the species diversity of forests within the river catchments.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Barbati, A., Corona, P., Marchetti, M. 2007. A forest typology for monitoring sustainable forest management: the case of European forest types. Plant Biosystems, 141, 93–103. DOI: 10.1080/11263500601153842
Barbati, A., Marchetti, M., Chirici, G., Corona, P. 2014. European Forest Type and Forest Europe SFM indicators: tools for monitoring progress on forest biodiversity conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 321, 145–151. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2013.07.004
Barbati, A., Arianoutsou, M., Corona, P., de las Heras, J., Fernandes, P., Moreira, F., Papageorgiou, K., Vallejo, R., Xanthopoulos, G. 2010. Post-fire forest management in southern Europe: a COST action for gathering and disseminating scientific knowledge. IForest, 3 (1), 5–7. DOI: 10.3832/ifor0523-003
Bondar, O.B. 2018. Forest cover percent and silvicultural and mensuration peculiarities of the stands in the river catchments in the Left-bank Forest Steppe (in Ukrainian). Forestry and Forest Melioration, 132, 13–24. DOI: 10.33220/1026-3365.132.2018.13
Braun-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3rd Edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Cajander, A.K. 1949. Forest types and their significance. Acta Forestalia Fennica, 56, 1–71.
Clements, F.E. 1916. Plant Succession: Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication Sciences, 242, 1–512. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.56234
Corona, P. 2016. Consolidating new paradigms in large-scale monitoring and assessment of forest ecosystems. Environmental Research, 144, 8–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.017
De Cáceres, M., Martín-Alcón, S., González-Olabarria, J.R., Coll, J. 2019. A general method for the classification of forest stands using species composition and vertical and horizontal structure. Annals of Forest Science, 76, 40. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-019-0824-0
Díaz-Redondo, M., Marchamalo, M., Egger, G., Magdaleno, F. 2018. Toward floodplain rejuvenation in the middle Ebro River (Spain): From history to action. Geomorphology, 317, 117–127. DOI: 10.1016/j. geomorph.2018.05.014
Drude, O. 1890. Handbuch der Pflanzengeographie. J. Engelhorn, Stuttgart.
Fernandez, P., Delgado, E., Lopez-Alonso, M., Manuel-Poyatos, J. 2018. GIS environmental information analysis of the Darro River basin as the key for the management and hydrological forest restoration. Science of the Total Environment, 613–614, 1154–1164. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.190
Flanagan, N.E., Richardson, C.J., Ho, M. 2015. Connecting differential responses of native and invasive riparian plants to climate change and environmental alteration. Ecological Applications, 25 (3), 753–767. DOI: 10.1890/14-0767.1
Furdychko, O.I., Pluhatar, Yu.V., Drebot, O.I. 2010. Forest typology as sustainable government the forests base (in Ukrainian). Agroecological Journal, 3, 5–13.
Herushynsky, Z.Yu. 1996. Typology of Ukrainian Carpathian forests: tutorial (in Ukrainian). Piramida, Lviv.
Horoshko, V.V. 2012. Forest cover percent of watersheds of rivers of the middle flow of Siversky Donets and peculiarities of forest forming in them (in Ukrainian). PhD Thesis, Kharkiv.
Jobin, T., Sabu, J., Thrivikramji, K.P. 2018. Assessment of soil erosion in a tropical mountain river basin of the southern Western Ghats, India using RUSLE and GIS. Geoscience Frontiers, 9 (3), 893–906. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2017.05.011
Lyle, J., Guyon, L., Battaglia, L. 2018. Ecological characteristics of floodplain forest reference sites in the Upper Mississippi River System. Forest Ecology and Management, 427, 208–216. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2018.06.007
Melniichuk, M.M., Chabanchuk, V.Yu. 2016. Analysis of scientific approaches to the typology and classification of natural forest landscape (in Ukrainian). Journal of Geology, Geography and Geoecology, 24 (1), 90–97. DOI: 10.15421/111613
Meusel, H. 1943. Vergleichende Arealkunde. I. Verl. Gebr. Borntraefer. Zehlendorf, Berlin.
Nazarenko, V.V., Pasternak, V.P. 2016. Patterns of formation of forest types of forest-steppe of the Kharkiv region (in Ukrainian). Pleiada, Kharkiv.
Ostapenko, B.F., Fedets, I.F., Pasternak, V.P. 1998. Typological diversity of Ukrainian forests. Zone of deciduous forests (in Ukrainian). KhNAU, Kharkiv.
Pogrebnyak, P.S. 1955. Basics of forest typology. Second Edition 2e (in Russian). Akademiya Nauk USSR, Kyiv.
Posokhov, P.P. 1971. Types of forests of mountain Crimea and their Caucasian counterparts (in Russian). Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Khar’kov.
Tkach, V.P. 1999. Floodplain forest of Ukraine (in Ukrainian). Pravo, Kharkiv.
Tkach, V.P. 2012. Contemporary issues of forest-ecological direction in forest typology (in Ukrainian). Scientific Herald of NULES of Ukraine, 171 (3), 230–238.
Valbuena, R., Maltamo, M., Packalen, P. 2016. Classification of multilayered forest development classes from low-density national airborne lidar datasets. Forestry, 89, 392–401. DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpw010
Vaz, A.S., Marcos, B., Gonçalves, J., Monteiro, A., Alves, P., Civantos, E. 2015. Can we predict habitat quality from space? A multi-indicator assessment based on an automated knowledge-driven system. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 37, 106–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jag. 2014.10.014
Vedmid, M.M., Mieshkova, V.L., Zhezhkun, A.M. 2006. Algorithm for revealing the land of youngsters in dibrovah for materials lisovorderkuvannya (in Ukrainian). Forestry and Forest Melioration, 110, 54–59.
Yin, Y., Wu, Y., Bartell, S.M., Cosgriff, R. 2009. Patterns of forest succession and impacts of flood in the Upper Mississippi River floodplain ecosystem. Ecological Complexity, 6 (4), 463–472. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.08.004