Running events in Polish forests in the opinion of their participants

Open access


The article presents the results of a questionnaire survey aimed at determining social preferences in relation to running as a form of active leisure time in forests. These preferences were established on the basis of surveys conducted via the Internet by means of social media services. The survey was carried out in 2016 and covered 346 people living in Poland, interested in running and jogging. It involved people over 18 years of age. As a research tool, an Internet questionnaire was used, which included questions concerning the attractiveness of the forest for practicing running, the frequency of running events in the forest, and factors motivating to take part in the running event. Statistical analysis was performed considering the influence of personal characteristics (gender, age, place of residence) and experience in running on the preferences of respondents with the use of the chi-square test. Men dominated among the respondents. The majority of respondents were people aged 35–44 living in towns. Over half of the respondents declared that they practiced athletic or recreational running for more than 4 years. The results show that the Polish forests are an attractive place for running. The preferences varied significantly, mainly in relation to gender, age, and experience in running. Age differentiated the views of respondents on the attractiveness of the forest as a place for running. Participating in forest running events was determined by gender, place of residence, and experience in running. Participants of such events are more frequently men, residing in towns. It was observed that the frequency of participation in running events increases with experience. The attractiveness of the running event was associated mainly with its general atmosphere and the characteristics of the running trail. However, the views were diversified according to gender, age, residence, and experience in running.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alberga K.A. Dawson C.P. 1993. Effects of seasonality and time of week on hiker motivations and satisfactions in the high peaks wilderness area. In: Proceedings of the 1993 Northeastern recreation research symposium 18–20 April 1993 Saratoga Springs NY. General Technical Report NE-185 119–122.

  • Ayres J. 1979. Sensory integration and the child. Western Psychological Services Los Angeles USA.

  • Faber T.A. Kuo F. Sullivan W. 2001. Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment and Behavior 33 (1) 54–77.

  • Dusiński M. 2016. Running tourism in Poland and its development. Master’s thesis Faculty of Economic Sciences SGGW Warsaw.

  • Dwyer J.F. 1993. Customer diversity and the future demand for outdoor recreation. In: Proceedings of the 1993 Northeastern recreation research symposium 18–20 April 1993 Saratoga Springs NY. General Technical Report NE-185 59–63.

  • Dzięgiel A. Lubowiecki-Vikuk A. 2013. Running events as a specific type of sporting events. Zeszyty Naukowe. Turystyka i Rekreacja 12 (2) 119–135.

  • Dzięgiel A. Tomanek M. 2014. The profile of a runner in mountain running competitions. Studia i Monografie AWF we Wrocławiu 120 88–102.

  • Elands B.H.M. Wiersum K.F. 2001. Forestry and rural development in Europe: an exploration of sociopolitical discourses. Forest Policy and Economics 3 5–16.

  • Getz D. McConnell A. 2014. Comparing trail runners and mountain bikers: motivation involvement portfolios and event-tourist careers. Journal of Convention and Event Tourism 15 (1) 69–100.

  • Gibson H. 2005. Towards an understanding of why sport tourism do what they do. Sport in Society 8 (2) 198–217.

  • Gill D.L. Williams L. Dowd D.A. Beaudoin C.M. 1996. Competitive orientations and motives of adult sport and exercise participants. Journal of Sport Behavior 19 307–318.

  • Gluck P. Weiss G. 1996. Forestry in the context of rural development: Future research needs. In: EFI Proceeding No. 15 15–17 April 1996 Vienna 173.

  • Hallmann K. Kaplanidou K. Breuer C. 2010. Event image perceptions among active and passive sports tourists at marathon races. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsourship 12 (1) 32–47.

  • Hammitt W.E Patterson M.E. 1993. Use patterns and solitude preferences of shelter campers in Great Smoky Mountains National Park U.S.A. Journal of Environmental Management 38 43–53.

  • Janeczko E. 2002. Environmental and social determinants of recreational functions of the Mazowiecki Landscape Park PhD thesis Faculty of Forestry SGGW Warsaw.

  • Janeczko E. Fialova J. Tomusiak R. Wo ́nicka M. Janeczko K. Budnicka-Kosior J. Kwaśny Ł. 2018. Attractiveness of running events in forests of Poland and Czech Republic (in Polish with English summary). Sylwan 162 (7) 610−616.

  • Janeczko E. Wo ́nicka M. Tomusiak R. Dawidziuk A. Kargul-Plewa D. Janeczko K. 2016. Social preferences regarding recreation in forests of the Mazowiecki Landscape Park in 2000 and 2012 (in Polish with English summary). Sylwan 161 (5) 422–429.

  • Koch N.E. 1996. Forestry in the context of rural development: future research needs. In: EFI Proceedings No 15 (eds.: P. Gluck G. Weiss) 9–12.

  • Lucas O.W.R. 1997. Aesthetic considerations in British forestry. Forestry 70 (4) 343–349.

  • Mitchell R. 2013. Is physical activity in natural environments better for mental health than physical activity in other environments? Social Science and Medicine 91 130–134.

  • Moore R. Wong H. 1997. Natural learning: Rediscovering nature’s way of teaching. MIG Communications Berkeley USA.

  • National Inventory of Runners 2014 — report (

  • Ogles B.M. Masters K.S. 2003. A typology of marathon runners based on cluster analysis of motivations. Journal of Sport Behavior 26 (1) 69–85.

  • Shipway R. Jones I. 2007. Running away from home: understanding visitor experiences and behavior at sport tourism events. International Journal of Tourism Research 9 373–383.

  • Šišak L. 1996. Frequention of forests by inhabitants of the Czech Republic. Lesnictvi – Forestry 42 (6) 245–253.

  • Swarbrick N. Eastwood G. Tutton K. 2004. Self-esteem and successful interaction as part of the forest school project. Support for Learning 19 (3) 142–146.

  • Tainio M. 2012. Artification of sport: the case of distance running. Contemporary Aesthetics 4 1–12.

  • Vander Stoep G.A. Duniavy L. 1992. Public involvement in developing park and open space recreation management strategies. Proceedings of the 1992 Northeastern recreation research symposium. General Technical Report NE-176 63–68.

  • Wann D.L. Schrader M.P. Wilson A.M. 1999. Sport fan motivation: questionnaire validation comparisons by sport and relationship to athletic motivation. Journal of Sport Behavior 22 (1) 114–139.

  • Waśkowski Z. 2014. Running as a form of women’s active leisure time spending — motives preferences and expectations. Marketing i Rynek 11 483–491.

  • Weed M. 2006. Sports tourism and the development of sports events (accessed 05.01.2017).

  • Wells N. 2000. At home with nature: Effects of “greenness” on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior 32 (6) 775–795.

  • Ziegler S.G. 1991. Perceived benefits of marathon running in males and females. Sex Roles 25 119–127.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.67

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.312
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.569

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 88 88 9
PDF Downloads 77 77 12