Primal–Dual Type Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

Open access

Abstract

A new, primal-dual type approach for derivation of Pareto front approximations with evolutionary computations is proposed.

At present, evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms derive a discrete approximation of the Pareto front (the set of objective maps of efficient solutions) by selecting feasible solutions such that their objective maps are close to the Pareto front. As, except of test problems, Pareto fronts are not known, the accuracy of such approximations is known neither.

Here we propose to exploit also elements outside feasible sets with the aim to derive pairs of Pareto front approximations such that for each approximation pair the corresponding Pareto front lies, in a certain sense, in-between. Accuracies of Pareto front approximations by such pairs can be measured and controlled with respect to distance between such approximations.

A rudimentary algorithm to derive pairs of Pareto front approximations is presented and the viability of the idea is verified on a limited number of test problems.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Coello Coello C. A. Van Veldhuizen D.A. and Lamont G.B. (2002) Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Kluwer Academic Publishers New York.

  • Deb K. (2001) Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. JohnWiley and Sons Chichester.

  • Hanne T. (2007) A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for approximating the efficient set. European Journal of Operational Research 176 1723-1734.

  • Kaliszewski I. Miroforidis J. (2012) Real and virtual Pareto set upper approximations. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Making ’11 eds. T. Trzaskalik T. Wachowicz The University of Economics in Katowice in print.

  • Kaliszewski I. Miroforidis J. Podkopayev D. (2011) Interactive Multiple Criteria Decision Making based on preference driven Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization with controllable accuracy - the case of -efficiency. Systems Research Institute Report RB/1/2011.

  • Kaliszewski I. Miroforidis J. Podkopayev D. (2012) Interactive Multiple Criteria Decision Making based on preference driven Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization with controllable accuracy. European Journal of Operational Research 216 188-199.

  • Kita H. Yabumoto Y. Mori N. Nishikawa Y. (1996) Multi-Objective Optimization by Means of the Thermodynamical Genetic Algorithm. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature- PPSN IV Voigt H-M. EbelingW. Rechenberg I. Schwefel H-P. eds Lecture Notes in Computer Science 504-512 Springer-Verlag.

  • Kita test problem: http://www.lania.mx/ccoello/EMOO/testfuncs/ downloaded September 28 2012.

  • Michalewicz Z. (1996) Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer.

  • Miroforidis J. (2008) Decision Making Aid for Operational Management of Department Stores with Multi-objective Optimization and Soft Computing. PhD Thesis Systems Research Institute Warsaw.

  • Talbi E. (2009) Metaheuristics: From Design To Implementation.Wiley.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.152
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.463

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2018: 0.08

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 904 438 0
PDF Downloads 1165 580 0