Evolutionary multi-objective optimization for inferring outranking model’s parameters under scarce reference information and effects of reinforced preference

Open access

Abstract

Methods based on fuzzy outranking relations constitute one of the main approaches to multiple criteria decision problems. The use of ELECTRE methods require the elicitation of a large number of parameters (weights and different thresholds); but direct eliciting is often a demanding task for the decision-maker (DM). For handling intensity-ofpreference effects on concordance levels, a generalized concordance model was proposed by Roy and Slowinski which is more complex than previous outranking models. In this paper, an evolutionary multi-objective-based indirect elicitation of the complete ELECTRE III model-parameter set is proposed. The evolutionary multi-objective inference method is successfully extended to inferring reinforced-preference model parameters. Wide experimental evidence is provided to support the proposal, which performs well even working on small size reference sets.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Butler J. Jia J. Dyer J. Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models European Journal of Operational Research 103 1997 531-546.

  • [2] Coello C.A. Lamont G.B. Van Veldhuizen D.A. Evolutionary Algorithms for SolvingMultiObjective Problems Second Edition. Springer New York 2007.

  • [3] Deb K. Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms John Wiley & Sons Chichester-New York-Weinheim-Brisbane-Singapore-Toronto 2001.

  • [4] Dias L.Mousseau V. Figueira J. Climaco J. An aggregation / disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE-TRI European Journal of Operational Research 138 2 2002 332-348.

  • [5] Dias L.C. Mousseau V. Inferring ELECTRE's veto-related parameters from outranking examples European Journal of Operational Research 170 1 2006 172-191.

  • [6] Doumpos M. Zopounidis C. Multicriteria Decision Aid Classification Methods Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht-Boston- London 2002.

  • [7] Doumpos M. Marinakis Y. Marimaki M. Zopounidis C. An evolutionary approach to construction of outranking models for multicriteria classification: The case of ELECTRE TRI method European Journal of Operational Research 199 2 2009 496-505.

  • [8] Fernandez E. Navarro J. and Duarte Α. Multicriteria sorting using a valued preference closeness relation European Journal of Operational Research 185 2 2008 673-686.

  • [9] Fernandez E. Navarro J. Bernal S. Multicriteria sorting using a valued indifference relation under a preference disaggregation paradigm European Journal of Operational Research 198 2 2009 602-609.

  • [10] Goletsis Y. Psarras J. Samouilidis J.E. Project Ranking in the Armenian Energy Sector Using a Multicriteria Method for Groups Annals of Operations Research 120 2003 135-157.

  • [11] Greco S. Mousseau V. Slowinski R. Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking with a set of additive value functions European Journal of Operational Research 191 2008 415-435.

  • [12] Greco S. Matarazzo B. Slowinski R. Zanakis S. Global investing risk: a case study of knowledge assessment via rough sets Annals of Operations Research 185 2011 103-138.

  • [13] Jacquet-Lagreze E. Siskos J. Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: The UTA method European Journal of Operational Research 10 2 1982 151-164.

  • [14] Keeney R. Raiffa H. Decision with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs Wiley New York 1976.

  • [15] Mangasarian O.L. Multisurface method for pattern separation IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 14 6 1968 801-807.

  • [16] Marchant T. Debate on How to assign numerical values to different parameters that aim at differentiating the role that the criteria have to play in a comprehensive preference model? 71 Meeting of the Euro Working Group Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Turin Italy 2010.

  • [17] Mavrotas G. Diakoulaki D. Capros P. Combined MCDA-IP Approach for Project Selection in the Electricity Market Annals of Operations Research 120 2003 159-170.

  • [18] Michalewicz Z. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs Springer Verlag Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1996.

  • [19] Mousseau V. Slowinski R. Inferring an ELECTRE-TRI model from assignment examples Journal of Global Optimization 122 1998 157-174.

  • [20] Mousseau V. Figueira J. Naux J.Ph. Using assignment examples to infer weights for ELECTRE TRI method: Some experimental results European Journal of Operational Research 130 2 2001 263-275.

  • [21] Mousseau V. Dias L.C. Valued outranking relations in ELECTRE providing manageable disaggregation procedures European Journal of Operational Research 156 2 2004 467-482.

  • [22] Perny P. Multicriteria filtering methods based on concordance and non- discordance principles Annals of Operations Research 80 1998 137-165.

  • [23] Pekelman D. Sen S.K. Mathematical programming models for the determination of attribute weights Management Science 20 1974 1217-1229.

  • [24] Pirlot M. Debate on How to assign numerical values to different parameters that aim at differentiating the role that the criteria have to play in a comprehensive preference model? 71 Meeting of the Euro Working Group Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Turin Italy 2010.

  • [25] Teixeira Almeida Α. Multicriteria Modelling of Repair Contract Based on Utility and ELECTRE I Method with Dependability and Service Quality Criteria Annals of Operations Research 1382005 113-126.

  • [26] Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods in: Bana e Costa C.A. (ed.) Reading in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid Springer­Verlag Berlin 1990 155-183.

  • [27] Roy Β. Slowinski R. Handling effects of reinforced preference and counter-veto in credibility of outranking European Journal of Operational Research 188 1 2008 185-190.

  • [28] Srinavasan V. Shocker A.D Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences Psichometrika 383 1973 337-396.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.152
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.463

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2017: 0.02

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 151 79 1
PDF Downloads 85 60 0