Behavioral multi-criteria decision analysis: further elaborations on the todim method

Open access


This short communication reviews the role of the TODIM method within behavioral decision theory and presents its genesis. Two important aspects of the method such as generalizing that method towards cumulative prospect theory and the choice of a reference point are further clarified.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Camerer C.F. and Ho T.-H. Violations of the Betweenness Axiom and Nonlinearity in Probability Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8 1994 167-196.

  • [2] Choquet G. Theory of capacities Annales de l’ Institut Fourier 5 1953 131-295.

  • [3] Edwards W. The Theory of Decision Making. Psychological Bulletin 41 1954 380-17.

  • [4] Eisenführ F. Weber M. and Langer T. Rational Decision Making Springer Verlag Berlin 2010.

  • [5] Fa-dong C. Xiao Z. Feng K. Zhi-ping F. and Xi C. A Method for Interval Multiple Attribute Decision Making With Loss Aversion 2010 International Conference of Information Science and Management Engineering 2010.

  • [6] Gomes L.F.A.M. and Lima M.M.P.P. TODIM: Basic and Application to Multicriteria Ranking of Projects with Environmental Impacts Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 16 1992a 113-127.

  • [7] Gomes L.F.A.M. and Lima M.M.P.P. From Modelling Individual Preferences to Multicriteria Ranking of Discrete Alternatives: A Look at Prospect Theory and the Additive Difference Model Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 17 (3) 1992b 171-184.

  • [8] Gomes L.F.A.M. and Rangel L.A.D. An Application of the TODIM Method to the Multicriteria Rental Evaluation of Residential Properties European Journal of Operational Research 193 2009 204-211.

  • [9] Gomes L.F.A.M. Rangel L.A.D. and Maranhão F.J.C. Multicriteria Analysis of Natural Gas Destination in Brazil: An application of the TODIM Method Mathematical and Computer Modelling 50 2009 92-100.

  • [10]Gonzalez R. and Wu. G. On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function Cognitive Psychology 38 1999 129-166.

  • [11]Kahneman D. and Tversky A. An Analysis of Decision Under Risk Econometrica Vol. 47 No. 2 March 1979 263-292.

  • [12]Kahneman D. and Tversky A. Choice Values and Frames Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2000.

  • [13]Korhonen P. Moskowitz H. and Wallenius J. Choice Behavior in Interactive Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Annals of Operations Research 23 1990 161-179.

  • [14]Lahdelma R. and Salminen P. Prospect Theory and Stochastic Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis (SMAA) Omega 37 2009 961-971.

  • [15]Moshkovich H.M. Gomes L.F.A.M. and Mechitov A.I. An Integrated Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach to Real Estate Evaluation: Case of the TODIM Method Pesquisa Operacional 31 (1) 2011 3-20.

  • [16]Phillips L.D. and von Winterfeldt D. Reflections on the Contributions of Ward Edwards to Decsion Analysis and Behavioral Research. In: Edwards W. Miles Jr. R. and von Winterfeldt D. (eds) Advances in Decision Analysis From Foundations to Applications Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2007 71-80.

  • [17]Salminen P. Generalizing Prospect Theory to the Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Context Unpublished paper 07-07-1991 University of Jyväskylä 1991.

  • [18]Salminen P. Descriptive and Prescriptive Modelling of Preferences within a Discrete Alternative Multiple Criteria Decision Framework Jyväskylä Studies in Computer Science Economics and Statistics 19 University of Jyväskylä 1992.

  • [19]Salminen P. Solving the Discrete Multiple Criteria Problem Using Linear Prospect Theory European Journal of Operational Research 72 1994 146-154.

  • [20]Trotta L.T.F. Nobre F.F. and Gomes L.F.A.M. Multi-Criteria Decision Making - An Approach to Setting Priorities in Health Care Statistics in Medicine 18 1999 3345-3354.

  • [21]Tversky A. and Kahneman D. Advances in Prospect Theory Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 1992 297-323.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.61

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.152
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.463

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2018: 0.08

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 400 172 7
PDF Downloads 163 75 10