A marriage of convenience or an amicable divorce: Metaphorical blends in the debates on Brexit

Open access


The paper investigates the interaction of conceptual blending and conceptual metaphor in producing figurative creativity in discourse. The phenomenon of figurative creativity is defined by Kövecses (2005) as creativity arising through the cognitive mechanisms of metonymy, metaphor, and blending. Specifically, the paper examines the use of creative figurative language in the British public discourse on the topic on Brexit. The aim of this paper is to show that conventional metaphors can be creatively stretched through conceptual blending, producing instances of creative figurative language. Specifically, applying blending theory, we will analyse innovative conceptual blends, motivated by the conventional marriage/divorce metaphor. In addition, the paper also examines the way in which creative figurative language produced in metaphorical blends provides discourse coherence at intertextual and intratextual levels.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Brandt Line Per Aage Brandt (2005). Making sense of a blend. A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3: 216-249.

  • Chaban Natalia Jessica Bain Katrina Stats (2007). Under construction: Images of the enlarging EU in the Australasian news media. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 1(2): 79-95.

  • Coulson Seana (1996). The Menendez brothers virus: Analogical mapping in blended spaces. Goldberg Adele ed. Conceptual Structure Discourse and Language. Stanford: CSLI 67-81.

  • Coulson Seana Todd Oakley (2000). Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3-4): 175-196.

  • Coulson Seana Cristobal Pagán Cánovas (2013). Understanding timelines: Conceptual metaphor and conceptual integration. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 5(1-2): 198-219.

  • Đurović Tatjana Nadežda Silaški (2018). The end of a long and fraught marriage: Metaphorical images structuring the Brexit discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 8(1): 25-39.

  • Gibbs Raymond (2000). Making good psychology out of blending theory. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3-4): 347-358.

  • Grady Joseph Todd Oakley Seana Coulson (1999). Conceptual blending and metaphor. Gibbs Raymond Gerard Steen eds. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins 101-124.

  • Fauconnier Gilles (1985). Mental Spaces. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

  • Fauconnier Gilles (2009). Generalized integration networks. Evans Vyvyan Stéphanie Pourcel eds. New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins 147-160.

  • Fauconnier Gilles Mark Turner (2000). Compression and global insight. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3-4): 283-304.

  • Fauconnier Gilles Mark Turner (2001). Conceptual integration networks. Extended version of “Conceptual integration networks.” 1998. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133-187 available at <www.markturner.org/cin.web/cin.html>

  • Fauconnier Gilles Mark Turner (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

  • Fauconnier Gilles Mark Turner (2006). Conceptual integration networks. Geeraerts Dirk ed. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 303-371. Reprint of “Conceptual integration networks.” 1998. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133-187.

  • Fauconnier Gilles Mark Turner (2008). Rethinking metaphor. Gibbs Raymond ed. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press 53-66.

  • Koller Veronika (2004a). Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke – New York: Palgrave.

  • Koller Veronika (2004b). Businesswomen and war metaphors: “Possessive jealous and pugnacious”? Journal of Sociolinguistics 8(1): 3–23.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2005). Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory. Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 168–184.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2009a). Metaphor culture and discourse: The pressure of coherence. Zinken Jörg Andreas Musolff eds. Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave – Macmillan 11-24.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2009b). The effect of context on the use of metaphor in discourse. Ibérica 17: 11–24.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2009c). Aspects of metaphor in discourse. Belgrade English Language and Literature Studies (Belgrade BELLS) 1: 81–95.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2010a). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. (2nd ed). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2010b). A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 21(4): 663–697.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones? Gonzálvez-García Francisco María Sandra Peña Cervel Lorena Pérez Hernández eds. Metaphor and metonymy revisited beyond the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: Recent developments and applications Special issue of Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1): 11–25.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2015). Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Kövecses Zoltán (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 28(2): 321–347.

  • Lakoff George (1987). Women Fire and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago – London: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lakoff George (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Ortony Andrew ed. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 202-251.

  • Lakoff George (1996). Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lakoff George (2016). Understanding Trump. Available at: https://georgelakoff.com/2016/07/23/understanding-trump-2/ Retrieved: June 16 2018

  • Lakoff George Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago - London: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lakoff George Mark Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.

  • Lakoff George Mark Turner (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Matovac Darko Goran Tanacković Faletar (2009). TCM i CIT – dvije suprotstavljene teorije ili krajnje točke istoga procesa? Jezikoslovlje 10(2): 133-151.

  • Musolff Andreas (2000a). Mirror-Images of Europe: The imagery used in the public debate about European Politics in Britain and Germany. München: iudicium.

  • Musolff Andreas (2000b). Political imagery of Europe: A house without exit doors? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21(3): 216-229.

  • Musolff Andreas (2001). Cross-language metaphors: parents and children love marriage and divorce in the European family. Cotterill Janet Anne Ife eds. Language across Boundaries. London – New York: Continuum 119-134.

  • Musolff Andreas (2004a). Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Musolff Andreas (2004b). The heart of the European body politic. British and German perspectives on Europe’s central organ. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development 25(5–6): 437-452.

  • Musolff Andreas (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 21(1): 23–38.

  • Musolff Andreas (2009). Love parenthood and gender in the European family: The British perspective. Renger Almut-Barbara Roland Alexander Ißler eds. Europa: Stier und Sternenkranz. Von der Union mit Zeus zum Staatenverbund. Gottingen: V&R unipress – Bonn University Press 536–548.

  • Musolff Andreas (2010). The Eternal outsider? Scenarios of Turkey’s ambitions to join the EU in the German press. Šaric Ljiljana Andreas Musolff Stefan

  • Manz Ingrid Hudabiunigg eds. Contesting Europe’s Eastern Rim: Cultural Identities in Public Discourse. Bristol: Multilingual Matters 157-171.

  • Musolff Andreas (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London-Oxford – New York: Bloomsbury.

  • Musolff Andreas (2017a). Truths lies and figurative scenarios: Metaphors at the heart of Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics 16(5): 641–657.

  • Musolff Andreas (2017b). How metaphors can shape political reality. The figurative scenarios at the heart of Brexit. Papers in Language and Communication Studies 1(1): 2-16.

  • Petrica Monica (2011). “Overt” vs. “covert” cultural variance in metaphor usage: ‘Europe’ vs. Malta and the EU-membership debate. Handl Sandra Hans-Jörg Schmid eds. Windows to the Mind: Metaphor Metonymy and Conceptual Blending. Berlin – New York: Walter de Gruyter 143-166.

  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez Francisco J. (1998). On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics 30(3): 259-274.

  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez Francisco J. Sandra Peña Cervel (2002). Cognitive operations and projection spaces. Jezikoslovlje 3(1-2): 131-158.

  • Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáňez Francisco J. Olga I. Díez Velasco (2003). Patterns of conceptual interaction. Dirven René Ralf Pörings eds. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 489-533.

  • Semino Elena (2002). A sturdy baby or a derailing train? Metaphorical representations of the Euro in British and Italian newspapers. Text 22(1): 107-139.

  • Semino Elena (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Šarić Ljiljana (2005). Metaphorical models in EU discourse in the Croatian media. Jezikoslovlje 6(2): 145-170.

  • Turner Mark (2007). Conceptual integration. Geeraerts Dirk Hubert Cuyckens eds. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press 377–393.

  • Turner Mark Gilles Fauconnier (1995). Conceptual integration and formal expression. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10(3): 183-204.

  • Turner Mark Gilles Fauconnier (1999). A mechanism of creativity. Poetics Today 20(3): 297-418.

  • Turner Mark Gilles Fauconnier (2003). Metaphor metonymy and binding. Dirven René Ralf Pörings eds. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 469-487.

  • Werkmann Ana Gabrijela Buljan (2013). Knocking on EU’s door: on the changing and conflicting metaphorical images of Croatia in selected EU press. Jezikoslovlje 14(2-3): 337-362.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 249 204 9
PDF Downloads 161 137 10