Learners’ preferences towards Corrective feedback in writing assignments in tertiary education

Open access

Abstract

For several decades, there has been a heated debate about the value of providing corrective feedback in writing assignments in English as a foreign language (EFL) classes. Despite the fact that corrective feedback in writing has been analysed from various angles, learners’ expectations regarding feedback given by language instructors are still to be considered, especially in different learning settings. Student attitudes have been found to be associated with motivation, proficiency, learner anxiety, autonomous learning, etc. (Elwood & Bode, 2014). Thus, the aim of this paper was to compare EFL learners’ attitudes towards corrective feedback and self-evaluation of writing skills in different learning settings. Students at two technological universities in France and Lithuania were surveyed and asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire combining the Likert scale and rank order questions. The results indicate that frequency of writing assignments seems to have little or no impact on students’ self-evaluation of writing skills. Moreover, although the two groups of students showed preference for feedback on different error types (e.g., feedback on structure vs. feedback on grammar), nevertheless, indirect corrective feedback with a clue was favoured by all the respondents.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ashwell Tim. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing 9.3: 227-257.

  • Bates Linda Janet Lane Ellen Lange (1993). Writing clearly: responding to ESL compositions. Boston MA: Heinle and Heinle.

  • Beuningen van Katherine (2010). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: theoretical perspective empirical insights and future direction. International Journal of English Studies 10.2: 1-27.

  • Bitchener John Ute Knoch (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 19.4: 207−217.

  • Bitchener John (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17: 102-108.

  • Bitchener John Stuart Young Denise Cameron (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 14.3: 191-205.

  • Bruton Anthony (2009). Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing and even if it were… System 37.4: 600−613.

  • Burt Marina (1975). Error analysis in the adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 9.1: 53-63.

  • Chandler Jean (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12.3: 267−296.

  • Corder Pit (1967). The significance of learner errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5.4: 161−169.

  • Diab Rula L. (2005). EFL university students’ preferences for error correction and teacher feedback on writing. TESL Reporter 38.1: 27−51.

  • Ellis Rod Younghee Sheen Mihoko Murakami Hide Takashima (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36.3: 353-371.

  • Elwood James A. Jeroen Bode (2014). Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan. System 42: 333−343.

  • ESLP 82 Questionnaire: Self-assessment of English Writing Skills and Use of Writing Strategies. URL: www.marquette.edu/oie/documents/ESLP82QuestionnaireFa08.pdf (accessed 01/02/2016)

  • Ferris Dana (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the shortand long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds.) Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. New York: Cambridge University Press 81-104.

  • Ferris Dana (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

  • Ferris Dana & Barrie Roberts (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing 10.3: 161-184.

  • Guenette Danielle (2007). Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 16.1: 40−53.

  • Hartshorn James K. Nowman W. Evans Paul F. Merrill Richard R. Sudweeks Diane Strong-Krause Neil J. Anderson (2010). Effects on Dynamic Corrective Feedback on ESL writing Accuracy. TESOL Quarterly 44.1: 84−109.

  • Harward Stan Nancy Peterson Byran Korth Jennifer Wimmer Brad Wilcox Timothy G. Morrison Sharon Black Sue Simmerman Linda Pierce (2014). Writing instruction in elementary classrooms: why teachers engage or do not engage students in writing. Literacy research and instruction 53: 205−224.

  • Hyland Fiona (2003). Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. System 31.2: 217-230.

  • Hyland Fiona Ye Han (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing 30: 31−44.

  • Kahraman Ayhan Fatma Yalvac (2015). EFL Turkish university students’ preferences about teacher feedback and its importance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 199: 73−80.

  • Jamalinesari Ali Farahnaz Rahimi Hsbib Gowhary Akbar Azizifar (2015). The effects of teacher written direct vs indirect feedback on students’ writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences 192: 116−123.

  • Lee Icy. (2005). Error correction in L2 writing classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada Journal / Revu TESL du Canada 22.2: 1−16.

  • Lee Icy (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing 13.4: 285−312.

  • Lee Icy (2003). L2 writing teachers’ perspectives practices and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing 8.3: 216−237.

  • Leki Ilona (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24.3: 203-218

  • McMartin-Miller Cristine (2014). How much feedback is enough? Instructor practices and student attitudes toward error treatment in second language writing. Assessing Writing 19: 24−35.

  • Pajares Frank (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs motivation and achievement in writing: a review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly 19.2: 139−158.

  • Sheen Younghee (2007). The Effect of Focused Written Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL learners’ Acquisition of Articles. TESOL Quarterly 41.2: 255−283.

  • Truscott John (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46: 327-369.

  • Truscott John (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16.4: 255-272.

  • Zhao Huahui (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: a comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing 15(1): 3−17.

  • Zumbrunn Sharon Sarah Mars Caitlin Mewborn (2016). Toward a better understanding of student perceptions of written feedback: a mixed methods study. Reading and Writing 29.2: 349−370.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 703 401 16
PDF Downloads 282 182 9