The development of technology and the widespread application of digital tools, such as teleconference (or videoconference), has led researchers to reflect on traditional theories and models of learning concerning Distance Education, as well as the formulation of new ones. The aim of this study is to propose the introduction of the concept tele-mathesis in Distance Learning, in order to describe the learning process by videoconferencing in Distance Education, which has features of an “embodied” and “integrated” way of learning. This is a theoretical study based on Illeris’ Theory of “Integrated” Learning that has been adopted in Distance Learning, using elements of the Theory of Tele-proximity concerning learning by videoconferencing in Distance Education. According to the developed argumentation the importance of the senses, emotions and “techniques of the body” is revealed in both the educational and learning process by videoconferencing, in order to reduce the transactional distance between the teacher and the learner, as well as, to lead to a positive distance educational experience. Thus, the cognitive, emotional and social factors involved in “tele-mathesis”, turn videoconferencing into an “embodied” and “integrated” way of learning. At the same time, it is showed that the empowerment of “tele-mathesis” requires appropriate planning and specific management methods. It is therefore proposed to introduce the term telemathesis in Distance Education so as to fully attribute this specific learning process of Distance Education.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Alexias, G. (2011). Sociology of the Body. Athens: Pedio.
2. Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence From Learners’ and Teachers’ Gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247-286. doi:10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
3. Anastasiadis, P., Manousou, E., Filippousis, G., Siakas, S., Koukoulis, N., Tomazinakis, A., …, & Karvounis, L. (2009). Videoconference and collaborative knowledge construction. From Theory to Practice: “ODYSSEUS 2009: Environment – Mediterranean Sea “ΚAPETAN SOS” Energy revolution – Renewable Energy”. In A. Lionarakis (Ed.), 5th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning. Open & Distance Learning for Global Collaboration and Educational Development. Athens November 27th - 29th 2009 (pp. 111-124). http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/icodl.503
4. Anastasiadis, P., Manousou, E., Siakas, S., Filippousis, G., Koukoulis, N., Tomazinakis, A., …, & Karvounis, L. (2011). Videoconference and collaborative knowledge construction. From Theory to Practice: “ODYSSEUS 2011: Environment – Mediterranean Sea “ΚAPETAN SOS” Energy revolution – Renewable Energy”. In A. Lionarakis (Ed.), 6th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning. Alternative Forms of Education. Loutraki November 4th -6th 2011 (pp. 669-684). http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/icodl.685
5. Αrmakolas, S., & Panagiotakopoulos, C. (2020). Distance learning through videoconferencing: the effects of technological factors. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Educational Technology, 16(1), 22-43. https://doi.org/10.12681/jode.22800
6. Çaliskan, M. (2014). Effect of Cognitive Entry Behaviors and Affective Entry Characteristics on Learning Level. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(5), 1816-1821. Retrieved December 30, 2018, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1050556
8. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
9. Gkousios, C., & Tzanavari, Μ. (2009). Implementations of videoconferencing technologies in the pedagogical process of language learning. In A. Lionarakis (Ed.), 5th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning. Open & Distance Learning for Global Collaboration and Educational Development. Athens November 27th - 29th 2009 (pp. 280-328). http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/icodl.498
10. Hillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 30-42. doi:10.1080/08923649409526853
12. Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, Empathy, and Mirror Neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 653-670. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604
13. Illeris, K. (2009). A comprehensive understanding of human learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists...in their own words (pp. 7-20). New York: Routledge.
14. Illeris, K. (2015). The Development of a Comprehensive and Coherent Theory of Learning. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 29-40. doi:10.1111/ejed.12103
15. Illeris, K. (2016). The way we learn. The multiple dimensions of learning in formal and informal education. Athens: Metehmio.
16. Iraklioti, E., Pantidos, P., & Birbili, M. (2017). The human body as a means of transferring knowledge: application for the shadow effect to pre-school children. In D. Stavrou, A. Mihailidi & A. Kokolaki (Eds.), 10th Hellenic Conference of Didactics of Science and New Technologies in Education. “Bridging the Gap between Sciences, Society and Educational Act”. Rethymno, April 7th - 9th 2017 (pp. 223-229). Retrieved January 7, 2020, from http://synedrio2017.enephet.gr/images/Praktika-10ou-Synedriou_Teliko.pdf
17. Jézégou, A. (2010). Community of Inquiry in E-learning: A Critical Analysis of the Garrison and Anderson Model. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 24(3). Retrieved December 8, 2018, from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/707
18. Kanellopoulos, A. (2019). Videoconferencing in Distance Education as an embodied and “integrated” way of learning. Towards a new theoretical framework of “tele-mathesis”. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Hellenic Open University, Patras. Retrieved November 30, 2019 from https://apothesis.eap.gr/handle/repo/44987
19. Kanellopoulos, A., & Koutsouba, M. (2017). Connecting Practices of Open and Distance Education, New Technologies and Forms of Learning. The case of MOOCs. In A. Lionarakis, S. Ioakimidou, M. Niari, G. Manousou, T. Hartofylaka, S. Papadimitriou & A. Apostolidou (Eds.), 9th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning. The Design of Learning. Athens November 23rd - 26th 2017 (pp. 123-135). http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/icodl.1128
20. Kanellopoulos, A., & Koutsouba, M. (2019). The Research on Videoconferencing in Distance Education. A Bibliographical Review. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Educational Technology, 15(2), 54-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/jode.21619
21. Kanellopoulos, A., Koutsouba, M., & Giossos, Y. (2019). Learning on a Tele-community of Inquiry. From the Transactional Distance Theory to the Theory of Tele-proximity. In A. Lionarakis, G. Manousou, S. Ioakimidou, M. Niari, A. Angeli, K. Sfakiotaki & V. Koutzeklidou (Eds.), 10th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning. The Design of Learning. Athens November 22nd - 24th 2019 (pp. 170-183). http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/icodl.2329
22. Kanellopoulos, A., Koutsouba, M., & Giossos, Y. (2020). Audiovisual Learning and Videoconferencing in Distance Education. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Educational Technology, 16(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.12681/jode.22976
23. Kokkinidou, A. (2017). Study, design and development of an interactive surface for maths practicing with simultaneous physical activity stimulation. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Hellenic Open University, Patras. Retrieved January 5, 2019 from https://apothesis.eap.gr/handle/repo/33903
24. Lionarakis, A. (2006). The theory of Open and Distance Learning and the complexity of its polymorphic dimension. In A. Lionarakis (Ed.), Open and Distance Learning – Elements of theory and act (pp. 11-41). Athens: Propompos.
25. Lionarakis, A., Papadimitriou, S., Hartofylaka, A., Aggeli, A., & Tzilou, G. (2018). The contribution of digital tools to students’ support in distance learning environments: Part A. The use of digital tools for the creation of digital learning material. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Educational Technology, 14(1), 104-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/jode.18533
26. Lachman, S. J. (1997). Learning is a Process: Toward an Improved Definition of Learning. The Journal of Psychology, 131(5), 477-480. doi:10.1080/00223989709603535
27. Lakoff, G. (2012). Explaining Embodied Cognition Results. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 773-785. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01222.x
28. Milioritsas, E., & Georgiadi, E. (2010). The influence of videoconference in the Hellenic Open University’s learning process. Aspects of students and tutors from distance learning and adult learning subject modules. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Educational Technology, 6(1-2), 152-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/jode.9757
29. Matteson, M. L. (2014). The Whole Student: Cognition, Emotion, and Information Literacy. College & Research Libraries, 75(6), 862-877. doi:10.5860/crl.75.6.862
30. Mavroidis, I., Karatrantou, A., Koutsouba, M., Giossos, Y., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Technology Acceptance and Social Presence in Distance Education-A Case Study on the Use of Teleconference at a Postgraduate Course of the Hellenic Open University. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 16(2), 76-96. Retrieved November 26, 2020, from https://old.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2013/Mavroidis_et_al.pdf
31. Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7. doi:10.1080/08923648909526659
32. Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education (pp. 22-38). New York: Routledge.
33. Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and Its Evolution: A Dual Coding Theoritical Approach. New York: Psychology Press.
34. Panagiotakopoulos, C., Tsiatsos, T., Lionarakis, A., & Tzanakos, N. (2013). Teleconference in support at distance learning: Views of educators. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Educational Technology, 9(1), 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/jode.9806
35. Papagiannidis, G. (2008). Senses and the common sense in Aristotle. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki. Retrieved January 26, 2019, from http://ikee.lib.auth.gr/record/109650
38. Rogers, A. (1999). Adult Education. Athens: Metehmio.
39. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
40. Sime, J. A., & Themelis, C. (2018). Exploring Video Literacy and the Practice of Educators: Videos, Vlogs, Videoconferencing and Holographic Teleportation. In T. Bastiaens, J. Van Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, G. Davidson-Shivers, K. DePryck, M. Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. Korsgaard Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, P. Weber, E. Weippl, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), edMedia & Innovate Learning World conference on educational Media and Technology. June 25th - 29th, 2018 (pp. 2029-2036). Netherlands: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 15, 2018, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/184444/
43. Themeli, C., & Bougia, A. (2016). Tele-proximity: Tele-community of Inquiry Model. Facial Cues for Social, Cognitive, and Teacher Presence in Distance Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6), 145-163. Retrieved November 6, 2018, from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2453/3950
44. Themelis, C. (2014). Synchronous Video Communication for Distance Education: the educators’ perspective. Open Praxis, 6(3), 245-256. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.6.3.128
46. Wu, E., Lin, W.-C., & Yang, S. C. (2013). An experimental study of cyber face-to-face vs. cyber text-based English tutorial programs for low-achieving university students. Computers & Education, 63, 52-61. doi:10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2012.11.018