Research reveals a rapid expansion of Open Educational Resources (OER) supporting global access to higher education for continued professional development (CPD) for in-service teachers. This offers interactive opportunities for participation and reflection to support the development of teacher cognition through a globally-oriented online community.
This paper will indicate whether the OER MOOCs designed for CPD of in-service English language teachers (ELT) have a role in developing teacher cognition. It also examines the in-service teacher experience of MOOC participants and proposes that teacher cognition and evaluation of cognitive change remain central to understanding teachers’ experience of learning on MOOCs.
Brookfield’s (1995) critical incident questionnaire (CIQ) captured the weekly experience of six in-service ELTs undertaking a CPD MOOC over four weeks. Thematic analysis and descriptive statistics were applied to CIQ data to examine changes in participant cognition. Teachers reflected on how MOOC developed their own knowledge, their learners’ knowledge, and to a lesser extent, their colleagues’ knowledge. The findings cast new light on the influence of MOOC which primarily shows that in terms of their own knowledge, teachers have a strong tendency to view MOOC participation as a pathway to their own development.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81-90. doi: 10.1177/003172171009200119
2. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. doi: 10.1017/S0261444803001903
3. Borg, S. (2006). Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. London: Continuum.
4. Borg, S. (2013). Teacher Research in Language Teaching: A Critical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Borg, S. (2015). Teacher Cognition and Language Education (1st ed.). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
6. Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2017). Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008-2015). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2). pp. 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
8. Breen, M., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: teachers’ principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 470-501. doi: 10.1093/applin/22.4.470
9. Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
10. Burns, A., Freeman, D., & Edwards, E. (2015). Theorizing and Studying the Language-Teaching Mind: Mapping Research on Language Teacher Cognition. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 585-601. doi: 10.1111/modl.12245
11. Clark, C., & Peterson, P. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296, 3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
13. Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
14. Dillahunt, T., Wang, B., & Teasley, S. (2014). Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1841
15. Dornyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Second Language Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
16. Dunkin, M. J. (1996). Types of Errors in Synthesizing Research in Education. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 87−97. doi: 10.3102/00346543066002087
17. Edge, J., & Richards, K. (1998). May I See Your Warrant, Please? Justifying Outcomes in Qualitative Research. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 334-356. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.3.334
18. Ellis, E. (2006). Language Learning Experience as a Contributor to ESOL Teacher Cognition. TESL-EJ, 10(1), A-3.
19. Farrel, T. S. C (2003). Learning to teach English language during the first year: personal influences and challenges. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 95-111. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00088-4
20. Feryok, A. (2010). Language teacher cognitions: Complex dynamic systems. System, 38(2), 272-279. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2010.02.001
21. Flores, B. B. (2001). Bilingual education teachers’ beliefs and their relation to self-reported practices. Bilingual Research Journal, 25, 251-75. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2001.10162795
22. Freeman, D. (1996). Redefining the relationship between research and what teachers know. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education (pp.88-115). Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
23. Freeman, D. (2002). The hidden side of the work: Teacher knowledge and learning to teach. A perspective from North American educational research on teacher education in English language teaching. Language Teaching, 35(01). doi: 10.1017/s0261444801001720
24. Freeman, D. (2016). Educating second language teachers: ‘The same things done differently’ Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Freeman, D., & Richards, J. (2010). Teacher learning in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
26. Glance, D., Forsey, M., & Riley, M. (2013). The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses. First Monday, 18(5). doi: 10.5210/fm.v18i5.4350
27. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Hayes, D., (2005). Exploring the lives of non-native speaking English educators in Sri Lanka. Teachers and Teaching, 11(2), 169-194. doi: 10.1080/13450600500083964
29. Johnson, K. E. (1992). Learning to teach: Instructional actions and decisions of preservice ESL teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 507-535. doi: 10.2307/3587176
30. Kiss, T. (2012). The Complexity of Teacher Learning: Reflection as a complex Dynamic System. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education, 2(1), 17-35.
31. Kubanyiova, M. (2006). Developing a motivational teaching practice in EFL teachers in Slovakia: Challenges of promoting teacher change in EFL contexts. TESL–EJ, 10, 1–17.
32. Kubanyiova, M., & Feryok, A. (2015). Language Teacher Cognition in Applied Linguistics Research: Revisiting the Territory, Redrawing the Boundaries, Reclaiming the Relevance. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 435–449. doi: 10.1111/modl.12239
33. Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008–2012. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 202–227. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
35. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279-301. doi: 10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826
37. Moe, R. (2015). The brief & expansive history (and future) of the MOOC: Why two divergent models share the same name. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 2(1), 2.
38. Numrich, C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 131−53. doi: 10.2307/3587610
39. Shavelson, R. (1973). What is the basic teaching skill? Journal of Teacher Education, 24, 114-151. doi: 10.1177/002248717302400213
40. Weaver. G. R. (1986). Understanding and coping with cross-cultural adjustment Stress. In R.M. Paige (Ed.), Cross-cultural orientation. New conceptualizations and applications. Lanham MD: University Press of America.
41. Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Wyatt, M., & Borg, S. (2011). Development in the practical knowledge of language teachers: A comparative study of three teachers designing and using communicative tasks on an in-service BA TESOL programme in the Middle East. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(3), 233-252. doi: 10.1080/17501229.2010.537340