The conditions for higher education teachers operating in a technology-enhanced education setting and an open educational context – such as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) – are different when compared to traditional teaching methods (e.g. in a lecture hall). This study investigates the grounds for 20 teachers at Swedish Higher education institutions to be involved in MOOC development projects. Six categories are found and described; including curiosity, merits, teaching development, flexibility, as well as the possibility to disseminate their research and expand their professional networks. Interviewees believed that the work was a viable way to strengthen their research portfolio, while also making a limited effort for teaching, enhancing the dissemination possibilities and strengthening their research networks.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Acker F. van Buuren H. van & Kreijns K. (2013). Resources : A Social Exchange Perspective Sharing OER as a Social Exchange Process. In R. McGreal W. Kinuthia & S. Marshall (Eds.) Open Educational Resources: Innovation Research and Practice (pp. 177-192). Commonwealth of Learning Athabasca University. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/pub_PS_OERIRP_web.pdf
2. Arcos B. de los Faems B. Comas-Quinn A. & Pulker H. (2017). Teachers’ Use and Acceptance of Gamification and Social Networking Features of an Open Repository. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0008
3. Bachy S. & Louvain U. de. (2014). TPDK a new definition of the TPACK model for a University. European Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning 17(2) 15–39.
4. Belikov O. M. & Bodily R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis 8(3) 235–246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
5. Bozkurt A. Akgün-Özbek E. & Zawacki-Richter O. (2017). Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008-2015). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3080
6. Brown M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. Internet and Higher Education 31 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001
7. Çakıroğlu Ü. Gökoğlu S. & Öztürk M. (2017). Pre-service Computer Teachers’ Tendencies towards the Use of Mobile Technologies: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. European Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning 20(1) 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0011
8. Cox G. (2016). Explaining the relations between culture structure and agency in lecturers’ contribution and non-contribution to Open Educational Resources in a Higher Education Institution. Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy to the School of Edu. University of Cape Town.
9. Cronin C. (2017). Openness and Praxis: Exploring the Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18(5) 15–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
10. Cronin C. I. (2018). Openness and Praxis: A Situated Study of Academic Staff Meaning-making and Decision-making with Respect to Openness and Use of Open Educational Practices in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/handle/10379/7276
11. Evans S. & Gall J. (2015). How MOOC instructors view the pedagogy and purposes of massive open online courses. Distance Education 36(3) 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.1081736
12. Hew K. F. & Cheung W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review 12 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
13. Goodfellow R. & Lea M. R. (2007). Challenging e-learning in the university : a literacies perspective. McGraw Hill Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
14. Hammersley M. (2011). Methodology : who needs it? Los Angeles: SAGE.
15. Karunanayaka S. P. Naidu S. Rajendra J. C. N. & Ariadurai S. A. (2018). Designing Continuing Professional Development MOOCs to promote the adoption of OER and OEP. Open Praxis 10(2) 179. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.2.826
16. Kilis S. Gülbahar Y. & Rapp C. (2016). Exploration of Teaching Preferences of Instructors’ use of Social Media. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning 19(1) 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2016-0001
17. Kolowich S. (2013 March 18). The Professors behind the MOOC. The Chronicle of Higher Education [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905
18. Kreber C. (2010). Academics’ teacher identities authenticity and pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education 35(2) 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902953048
19. Kvale S. & Brinkmann S. (2014). Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
20. Liyanagunawardena T. R. Lundqvist K. Mitchell R. Warburton S. & Williams S. A. (2019). A MOOC Taxonomy Based on Classification Schemes of MOOCs. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning 22(1) 85-103.
21. McNaughton S. M. & Billot J. (2016). Negotiating academic teacher identity shifts during higher education contextual change. Teaching in Higher Education21(6) 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1163669
22. Nascimbeni F. & Burgos D. (2016). In search for the open educator: Proposal of a definition and a framework to increase openness adoption among university educators. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 17(6) 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V17I6.2736
23. Olsson U. (2017). Higher Education Lecturers Lived Experience of Going Public in MOOCs. Open Praxis 9(3) 287–297. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.3.589
24. Price D. (2015 April 16). What Will Education Look Like in a More Open Future? | MindShift | KQED News [Blog post]. Retrieved February 21 2019 from https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/40074/what-will-education-look-like-in-a-more-open-future
25. Pundak D. & Dvir Y. (2014). Engineering College Lecturers Reluctance to Adopt Online Courses. Retrieved September. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning 17(1) 210–226. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0014
26. Rolfe V. (2012). Open educational resources: Staff attitudes and awareness. Research in Learning Technology 20(1) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0/14395
27. Ross J. Sinclair C. Knox J. Bayne S. & Macleod H. (2014). Teacher Experiences and Academic Identity: The Missing Components of MOOC Pedagogy. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 10(1) 57–69.
28. Roth M. (2013). My Modern Experience Teaching a MOOC. Chronicle of Higher Education 59(34) B18–B21. Retrieved from https://www.chronicle.com/article/My-Modern-MOOC-Experience/138781
29. Salmon G. (2014). Learning Innovation: A Framework for Transformation. European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning 17(2) 219–235.
30. Schneckenberg D. (2009). Understanding the real barriers to technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Educational Research 51(4) 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880903354741
31. Siemens G. (2008). Learning and Knowing in Networks: Changing roles for Educators and Designers.
32. Stöhr C. Stathakarou N. Mueller F. Nifakos S. & McGrath C. (2019). Videos as learning objects in MOOCs: A study of specialist and non-specialist participants’ video activity in MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology 50(1) 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12623
33. Wannemacher K. & Jungermann I. (2015). MOOCs from the Instructors’ Perspective Klaus. Proceedings of the European MOOC Stakeholder Summit 2015 81–85.
34. Weller M. & Anderson T. (2013). Digital resilience in higher education. European Journal of Distance and E-learning 2013(I). Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/36988/1/Weller_Anderson.pdf
35. Zheng S. Wisniewski P. Rosson M. B. & Carroll J. M. (2016). Ask the Instructors: Motivations and Challenges of Teaching Massive Open Online Courses. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing – CSCW’ 16 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820082