Teleconference in Support of Autonomous Learning

Stefanos Armakolas 1 , Christos Panagiotakopoulos 1  and Anthi Karatrantou 1
  • 1 University of Patras, , Greece


In Distance education, learning depends on the ability of the learner to manage his/her learning process, both through the creation of appropriate objectives, and by adopting strategies to achieve them. The role of the teacher is to develop an efficient methodology with flexibility over the learners’ special characteristics and to create conditions to enable the learners to manage their learning process. This research aims to investigate the parameters which are involved in synchronous teleconference and which lead to effective learning through the support of an autonomous environment. The research was conducted with students of the Annual Training Program for Teachers of Higher School of Pedagogical and Technological Education Department in Patras. The results show that teleconference as teaching tool can support the autonomous learning and can enhance personalisation as this process can help students to learn and develop skills by receiving efficient support.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Achtemeier, S. D., Morris, L. V., & Finnegan, C. L. (2003). Considerations for developing evaluations of online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 1-13.

  • 2. Alimisis, D., & Plessas, A. (2011). Teacher Distance Training in Educational Robotics through Synchronous Audiographic Conferencing: towards a Learner-centered Approach. Proceedings of the EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 901-906. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

  • 3. Anastasiades, P. (2008a). The Interactive Teleconference at the Modern School: A Framework for Teaching Design. Proceedings of the 6th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation: Communication and Information Technologies in Education. Limassol 25-28 September 2008.

  • 4. Anastasiades, P.S. (2008b). Teleconference in the service of life-long learning and distance education. Pedagogical applications of collaborative distance learning from the Hellenic post-secondary education. Athens: Gutenberg (in Greek).

  • 5. Armakolas, S., Alimisis, D., & Panagiotakopoulos, Ch. (2013). The Flashmeeting Digital Platform: A I am not scared Project for school violence study. Proceedings of ICODL, 192-200.

  • 6. Armakolas, S., Mikroyannidis, A., Panagiotakopoulos, Ch., & Panousopoulou, S. (2016). A case study on the Perceptions of Educators on the Penetration of Personal Learning Environments in Typical Education. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 6(1), 18-28. doi: 10.4018/IJVPLE.2016010102.

  • 7. Armakolas, S., Panagiotakopoulos, Ch., & Fragoulis, I. (2014). The distance learning of courses between branches of ASPETE. Using the Flashmeeting digital platform. Proceedings of the 9th Pan-Hellenic Conference with International Participation “Information and Communication Technologies in Education”, University of Crete, 451-458.

  • 8. Armakolas, S., Panagiotakopoulos, Ch., & Vasilopoulou, G. (2014). The Learning Environment in a Virtual Videoconference Classroom and Transforming Learning. Proceedings of the 9th Panhellenic Conference “Greek Pedagogical and Educational Research”, University of Western Macedonia, vol. A, 339-353

  • 9. Athanasiou, L. (2000). Methods and Techniques of Research in Educational Sciences. Ioannina.

  • 10. Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Menlo Park: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Retrieved from

  • 11. Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 359–375.

  • 12. Baynton, M. (1992). Dimensions of “control” in distance education: A factor analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 6(2), 17-31.

  • 13. Bell, J. (2014). Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

  • 14. Castañeda, L., Cosgrave, M., Marin, V., & Cronin, C. (2016). Personal Learning Environments: PLE Conference 2015 Special Issue Guest Editorial. Digital Education Review, 29.

  • 15. Castañeda, L., Dabbagh, N., & Torres-Kompen, R. (2017). Personal Learning Environments: Research-Based Practices, Frameworks and Challenges. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 1.

  • 16. Chaney, B. H., Eddy, J. M., Dorman, S. M., Glessner, L. L., Green, B. L., & Lara-Alecio, R. (2009). A primer on quality indicators of distance education. Health Promotion Practice, 10(2), 222-231.

  • 17. Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M., & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4-5), 404-420.

  • 18. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1997). Methodology of Educational Research. Athens: Expression.

  • 19. Coureau, S. (2000). The basic “tools” of the adult educator. Athens: Metaixmio.

  • 20. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal Learning Environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and higher education, 15(1), 3-8.

  • 21. Dille, B., & Mezack, M. (1991). Identifying predictors of high risk among community college telecourse students. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 24-35.

  • 22. Dobbs, R. R., Waid, C. A., & del Carmen, A. (2009). Students’ perceptions of online courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 10(1), 9-26.

  • 23. Dunn, K. (2000). Interviewing. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

  • 24. Ehlers, U. D., & Pawlowski, J. M. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook on Quality and Standardisation in E-learning. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • 25. Fiedler, S. H., & Väljataga, T. (2011). Personal learning environments: concept or technology? International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 2(4), 1-11.

  • 26. Fotiadou, A., Angelaki, C., & Mavroidis, I. (2017). Learner Autonomy as a Factor of the Learning Process in Distance Education. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 20(1), 95-110.

  • 27. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.

  • 28. Giannakoudakis, Z., & Giossos, G. (2017). Differences between Regular and Distance Education in a Teacher’s Training Program. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 20(2), 17-29.

  • 29. Gunawardena, C. N., & McIsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance Education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 355-395). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

  • 30. Hrtoňová, N., Kohout, J., Rohlíková, L., & Zounek, J. (2015). Factors influencing acceptance of e-learning by teachers in the Czech Republic. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 873-879.

  • 31. Issing, L. J. (2002). Instruktions-Design für Multimedia. In L.J. Issing & P. Klimsa (Eds.), Informationen und Lernen mit Multimedia and Internet. Lehrbuch für Studium und Praxis (3rd ed.) (pp.151–178). Weinheim: Beltz, Psychologische Verlags Union.

  • 32. Jarvis, P. (1999). Adult & Continuing Education (2nd ed.) London: Routledge.

  • 33. Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., & Haywood, K. (2011). The Horizon Report: 2011 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

  • 34. Khan, B. H. (Ed.) (2005). Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation, and evaluation. IGI Global.

  • 35. Κnowles, M., Holton, E., & Swanson, R. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (5th ed.). Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.

  • 36. Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., Bozkurt, A., & Buyuk, K. (2018). Measuring Self-Regulation in Self-Paced Open and Distance Learning Environments. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1).

  • 37. Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2014). Developing a framework for research on Personal Learning Environments. E-learning in Europe Journal, 35. Retrieved on 02/02/2018 from

  • 38. Koutsoukos, M., Fragoulis, I., & Valkanos, E. (2015). Connection of environmental education with application of experiential teaching methods: A case study from Greece. International Education Studies, 8(4), 23.

  • 39. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews, An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

  • 40. Kyriazopoulos, P., & Samanta, E. (2011). Methodology for researching diploma theses. Athens: Sychroni Ekdotiki.

  • 41. Laube, M. R. (1992). Academic and Social Integration Variables and Secondary Student Persistence in Distance Education. Research in Distance Education, 4(1), 2-9.

  • 42. Laurillard D. (2012), Teaching as a Design Science. Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. N.Y.: Routledge.

  • 43. Lionarakis, A., & Lykourgiotis, A. (1999). Open and Traditional Education. In D. Vergides, A. Lionarakis, A. Lykourgiotis, V. Makrakis, & C. Matralis (Eds.), Open and distance education: Institutions and functions (vol. A, pp.31-32). Patras: Hellenic Open University Publications.

  • 44. Maloof, J. (2006). Experience This! The Experiential Approach to Teaching Environmental Issues. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 5, 193-197.

  • 45. Mavroidis, H. (2009). Possibility and conditions for the use of modern communication and e-learning methods in programs of the Hellenic Open University School of Humanities. Case study in parts of the EWC65. Postgraduate thesis. Hellenic Open University.

  • 46. Mavroidis, I., Karatrantou, A., Koutsouba, M., Giossos, Y., & Papadakis, S. (2013). Technology acceptance and social presence in distance education–A case study on the use of teleconference at a postgraduate course of the Hellenic Open University. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 16(2).

  • 47. McGloughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28–43.

  • 48. Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.

  • 49. Mikroyannidis, A., Connolly T., & Law, E. (2012). A survey into the teacher’s perception of self-regulated learning. Proceedings of 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 696–697.

  • 50. Mikroyannidis, A., Connolly, T., Law, E. L. C., Schmitz, H. C. Vieritz, H., Nussbaumer, A. Berthold, M., Ullrich, C., & Dhir, A. (2014). Self-regulated learning in formal education: perceptions, challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(2), 145-163.

  • 51. Nikolaki, E., & Koutsoumpa, M. (2013). Self-regulated learning in distance education. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 9(1), 19-31.

  • 52. Panagiotakopoulos, C., (2014). Information and Communication Technologies: An overall view. Athens.

  • 53. Panagiotakopoulos, C., Tsiatsos, T., Lionarakis A., & Tzanakos N. (2013). Teleconference in support of distance learning: Views of educators. Open Education – The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 9(1), 5-18.

  • 54. von Prummer, C. (1990). Study Motivation of Distance Students: A Report on Some Results from a Survey Done at the FernUniversitat in 1987/88. Research in Distance Education, 2(2), 2-6.

  • 55. Smith, M. M. (2011). The quality factors which influence online learning and impact on the student experience (Doctoral dissertation). Open University.

  • 56. Tsiotakis, P., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2017). Investigating the Role of Structure in Online Teachers’ Communities of Learning. In P. Anastasiades & N. Zaranis (Eds.), Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 161-174). Springer, Cham.

  • 57. Türker, M. A., & Zingel, S. (2008). Formative interfaces for scaffolding self-regulated learning in PLEs. Elearning papers, 14(9, July).

  • 58. Tzanakos, N. (2012). The positive and negative aspects in the use of teleconference as an educational tool, from the perspective of educators. Master Thesis. Patra: Hellenic Open University.

  • 59. Valkanos, E., & Fragoulis, I. (2007). Experiential learning–its place in in-house education and training. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 21(5), 21-23.

  • 60. Vlachopoulos, P., & Hatzigianni, M. (2017). Online Learning and Self-Regulation: Balancing Between Personal and Social Dimensions. In P. Anastasiades & N. Zaranis (Eds.), Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 177-188). Switzerland: Springer.

  • 61. Weiss, R. E., Knowlton, D. S., & Speck, B. W. (2000). Principles of Effective Teaching in the Online Classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  • 62. Welsh, J. B. (2007). Identifying factors that predict student success in a community college online distance learning course. (Doctoral Dissertation). University of North Texas Digital Library. (OCLC: 230804538). Retrieved on 02/05/2018 from distance%20learning%20course

  • 63. Wiesenberg, F., & Stacey, E. (2005). Reflections on Teaching and Learning Online: Quality program design, delivery and support issues from a cross-global perspective. Distance Education, 26(3), 385-404.

  • 64. Wilson, S. (2008). Patterns of personal learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 16(1), 17-34.

  • 65. Xenos, M., Tsiatsios, Th., & Vassiliadis, B. (2008). Large-scale deployment of distance education in computer science at the Hellenic Open University. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 4(2/3), 285-297.

  • 66. Yen, C. J., Tu, C. H., Sujo-Montes, L., & Sealander, K. (2016). A Predictor for PLE Management: Impacts of Self-Regulated Online Learning on Student’s Learning Skills. Journal of Educational Technology Development & Exchange, 9(1), 29-48.

  • 67. Zimmermann, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Theoretical Perspective. N.Y.: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.


Journal + Issues